Proposal for Using Digital Tools in Mitigating a Pandemic: Lessons Learned from COVID-19

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q3 LAW
Stephanie N Bernardo, Kylie Zeng, W. Havins
{"title":"Proposal for Using Digital Tools in Mitigating a Pandemic: Lessons Learned from COVID-19","authors":"Stephanie N Bernardo, Kylie Zeng, W. Havins","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2021.1914469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Since the COVID-19 outbreak began in Wuhan China, countries across the world have been forced to take unprecedented measures to combat it. While some countries are still grappling with the COVID-19 pandemic, others have fared better and have established relative normalcy quickly. The rapid transmission rate of the virus has shown a greater need for efficient and technologically modern containment measures. The use of digital tools to facilitate strict containment measures in countries that have faired well against the COVID-19 pandemic has sparked both interest and controversy. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we compare the precautions taken against the spread of COVID-19, particularly the use of digital tools in contact tracing, and propose policies that could be utilized in the U.S. for future COVID-19 waves or pandemics. METHODS: COVID-19 death rates data were obtained from the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) accessed through the Our World in Data database, and were evaluated based on population size per 100,000 from December 31, 2019 to September 6, 2020. All policies and measures enacted were obtained from their respective governmental websites. RESULTS: We found a strong association between lower death rates per capita and countries that implemented early mask use and strict border control measures that included mandatory quarantine using digital tools. There is a significant difference in the number of deaths per 100,000 when comparing Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore versus the U.S., Spain, and Italy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our research, it is evident that early intervention with the use of digital tools has a strong correlation for containing COVID-19. Infection rates and subsequent deaths in Italy, Spain, and more specifically the U.S. could have been much lower with early mask use and, more importantly, timely border control measures utilizing modern digital tools. Thus, we propose that the U.S. execute the following national policies should a public health emergency be declared: (1) Immediately establish a National Command responsible for enacting strict mandatory guidelines enforced by federal and state governments, including national mask use. (2) Mandate civilian cooperation with health officials in contact tracing and quarantine orders. Incoming travelers to the U.S. and those quarantined will be required to download a contact tracing app. We acknowledge the countries we studied differ in their cultures, political systems, and reporting criteria for COVID-19 deaths. Further research may need to be conducted to address these limitations; however, we believe that the proposed policies could protect the American public.","PeriodicalId":44014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2021.1914469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the COVID-19 outbreak began in Wuhan China, countries across the world have been forced to take unprecedented measures to combat it. While some countries are still grappling with the COVID-19 pandemic, others have fared better and have established relative normalcy quickly. The rapid transmission rate of the virus has shown a greater need for efficient and technologically modern containment measures. The use of digital tools to facilitate strict containment measures in countries that have faired well against the COVID-19 pandemic has sparked both interest and controversy. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we compare the precautions taken against the spread of COVID-19, particularly the use of digital tools in contact tracing, and propose policies that could be utilized in the U.S. for future COVID-19 waves or pandemics. METHODS: COVID-19 death rates data were obtained from the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) accessed through the Our World in Data database, and were evaluated based on population size per 100,000 from December 31, 2019 to September 6, 2020. All policies and measures enacted were obtained from their respective governmental websites. RESULTS: We found a strong association between lower death rates per capita and countries that implemented early mask use and strict border control measures that included mandatory quarantine using digital tools. There is a significant difference in the number of deaths per 100,000 when comparing Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore versus the U.S., Spain, and Italy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our research, it is evident that early intervention with the use of digital tools has a strong correlation for containing COVID-19. Infection rates and subsequent deaths in Italy, Spain, and more specifically the U.S. could have been much lower with early mask use and, more importantly, timely border control measures utilizing modern digital tools. Thus, we propose that the U.S. execute the following national policies should a public health emergency be declared: (1) Immediately establish a National Command responsible for enacting strict mandatory guidelines enforced by federal and state governments, including national mask use. (2) Mandate civilian cooperation with health officials in contact tracing and quarantine orders. Incoming travelers to the U.S. and those quarantined will be required to download a contact tracing app. We acknowledge the countries we studied differ in their cultures, political systems, and reporting criteria for COVID-19 deaths. Further research may need to be conducted to address these limitations; however, we believe that the proposed policies could protect the American public.
关于使用数字工具缓解大流行的建议:从COVID-19吸取的经验教训
背景:新冠肺炎疫情在中国武汉爆发以来,世界各国被迫采取前所未有的防控措施。虽然一些国家仍在与COVID-19大流行作斗争,但其他国家的情况较好,并迅速建立了相对正常的状态。该病毒的快速传播速度表明,更需要采取有效和技术现代化的遏制措施。在应对COVID-19大流行表现良好的国家,利用数字工具促进严格的控制措施既引发了兴趣,也引发了争议。目的:在本研究中,我们比较了针对COVID-19传播所采取的预防措施,特别是在接触者追踪中使用数字工具的情况,并提出了可在美国用于未来COVID-19浪潮或大流行的政策。方法:2019年12月31日至2020年9月6日,从欧洲疾病预防控制中心(ECDC)通过Our World in data数据库获取COVID-19死亡率数据,并根据每10万人的人口规模进行评估。所有制定的政策和措施均来自各自的政府网站。结果:我们发现,较低的人均死亡率与实施早期口罩使用和严格边境控制措施(包括使用数字工具强制隔离)的国家之间存在密切关联。台湾、韩国、新加坡与美国、西班牙、意大利相比,每10万人中死亡人数相差很大。结论:根据我们的研究,显然使用数字工具进行早期干预与遏制COVID-19具有很强的相关性。在意大利、西班牙,特别是美国,如果早期使用口罩,更重要的是,及时采取利用现代数字工具的边境控制措施,感染率和随后的死亡率本可以低得多。因此,我们建议美国在宣布公共卫生紧急情况时执行以下国家政策:(1)立即建立一个国家指挥部,负责制定由联邦和州政府执行的严格强制性指导方针,包括全国口罩使用。(2)在接触者追踪和检疫令方面与卫生官员进行民事合作。到美国的入境旅客和被隔离的人将被要求下载接触者追踪应用程序。我们承认,我们研究的国家在文化、政治制度和COVID-19死亡报告标准方面存在差异。可能需要进行进一步的研究来解决这些限制;然而,我们认为拟议的政策可以保护美国公众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Medicine is the official quarterly publication of the American College of Legal Medicine (ACLM). Incorporated in 1960, the ACLM has among its objectives the fostering and encouragement of research and study in the field of legal medicine. The Journal of Legal Medicine is internationally circulated and includes articles and commentaries on topics of interest in legal medicine, health law and policy, professional liability, hospital law, food and drug law, medical legal research and education, the history of legal medicine, and a broad range of other related topics. Book review essays, featuring leading contributions to the field, are included in each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信