Evaluation of Risk Scores as Predictive Tools for Stroke in Patients with Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study.

Marie Ørskov, Henrik Vorum, Torben Bjerregaard Larsen, Flemming Skjøth
{"title":"Evaluation of Risk Scores as Predictive Tools for Stroke in Patients with Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study.","authors":"Marie Ørskov,&nbsp;Henrik Vorum,&nbsp;Torben Bjerregaard Larsen,&nbsp;Flemming Skjøth","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1758713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  We investigated the 1-year risk of stroke in patients with retinal artery occlusion and evaluated the predictive and discriminating abilities of contemporary risk stratification models for embolic stroke. <b>Methods</b>  This register-based cohort study included 7,906 patients with retinal artery occlusion from Danish nationwide patient registries between 1995 and 2018. The study population was stratified according to the number of points obtained in the stroke risk scores: the CHA <sub>2</sub> DS <sub>2</sub> -VASc score and the ESSEN Stroke Risk score. The 1-year risk of stroke within strata was evaluated and compared using the cox proportional hazards model. Furthermore, the discrimination of the risk scores as predictive tools for stroke risk assessment was investigated using C-statistics, Brier score, and the index of prediction accuracy. <b>Results</b>  The stroke event rate in patients with retinal artery occlusion increased as the score increased for both risk scores, ranging from 3.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.46-5.31) per 100 person-years to 13.25 (95% CI: 11.78--14.89) per 100-person-years for increasing levels of the CHA <sub>2</sub> DS <sub>2</sub> -VASc score and from 3.97 (95% CI: 2.97-5.32) per 100 person-years to 16.43 (95% CI: 14.01-19.27) per 100 person-years for increasing levels of the ESSEN Stroke Risk score. Using a risk score of 0 as a reference, the difference was statistically significant for retinal artery occlusion patients with a CHA <sub>2</sub> DS <sub>2</sub> -VASc score of 2 or above and for all levels of the ESSEN Stroke Risk score. The C-statistics for the risk scores was 61% (95% CI: 58%-63%) and 62% (95% CI: 59-64%) for the CHA <sub>2</sub> DS <sub>2</sub> -VASc score and ESSEN Stroke Risk score, respectively. <b>Conclusion</b>  The results suggested that the use of the CHA <sub>2</sub> DS <sub>2</sub> -VASc score and the ESSEN Stroke Risk score was applicable for risk stratification of stroke in patients with retinal artery occlusion, but discrimination was poor due to low specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22238,"journal":{"name":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"6 4","pages":"e429-e436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose  We investigated the 1-year risk of stroke in patients with retinal artery occlusion and evaluated the predictive and discriminating abilities of contemporary risk stratification models for embolic stroke. Methods  This register-based cohort study included 7,906 patients with retinal artery occlusion from Danish nationwide patient registries between 1995 and 2018. The study population was stratified according to the number of points obtained in the stroke risk scores: the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and the ESSEN Stroke Risk score. The 1-year risk of stroke within strata was evaluated and compared using the cox proportional hazards model. Furthermore, the discrimination of the risk scores as predictive tools for stroke risk assessment was investigated using C-statistics, Brier score, and the index of prediction accuracy. Results  The stroke event rate in patients with retinal artery occlusion increased as the score increased for both risk scores, ranging from 3.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.46-5.31) per 100 person-years to 13.25 (95% CI: 11.78--14.89) per 100-person-years for increasing levels of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and from 3.97 (95% CI: 2.97-5.32) per 100 person-years to 16.43 (95% CI: 14.01-19.27) per 100 person-years for increasing levels of the ESSEN Stroke Risk score. Using a risk score of 0 as a reference, the difference was statistically significant for retinal artery occlusion patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of 2 or above and for all levels of the ESSEN Stroke Risk score. The C-statistics for the risk scores was 61% (95% CI: 58%-63%) and 62% (95% CI: 59-64%) for the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and ESSEN Stroke Risk score, respectively. Conclusion  The results suggested that the use of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and the ESSEN Stroke Risk score was applicable for risk stratification of stroke in patients with retinal artery occlusion, but discrimination was poor due to low specificity.

Abstract Image

评估风险评分作为视网膜动脉闭塞患者中风的预测工具:一项丹麦全国队列研究。
目的:研究视网膜动脉闭塞患者1年内发生脑卒中的风险,评估当代栓塞性脑卒中风险分层模型的预测和判别能力。方法:这项基于登记的队列研究纳入了1995年至2018年丹麦全国患者登记的7906例视网膜动脉闭塞患者。根据卒中风险评分的分值对研究人群进行分层:CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc评分和ESSEN卒中风险评分。采用cox比例风险模型对地层内1年卒中风险进行评估和比较。此外,采用c统计、Brier评分和预测准确度指数对风险评分作为脑卒中风险评估的预测工具的区别进行了研究。结果视网膜动脉闭塞患者的卒中事件发生率随着两种风险评分的增加而增加,CHA 2 ds2 -VASc评分水平升高的每100人年从3.62(95%可信区间[CI]: 2.46-5.31)增加到13.25 (95% CI: 11.78- 14.89), ESSEN卒中风险评分水平升高的每100人年从3.97 (95% CI: 2.97-5.32)增加到16.43 (95% CI: 14.01-19.27)。以风险评分0分为参照,CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc评分2分及以上的视网膜动脉闭塞患者与ESSEN卒中风险评分各等级患者的差异均有统计学意义。CHA 2 ds2 -VASc评分和ESSEN卒中风险评分的c统计值分别为61% (95% CI: 58%-63%)和62% (95% CI: 59-64%)。结论CHA 2 ds2 -VASc评分和ESSEN卒中风险评分适用于视网膜动脉闭塞患者卒中风险分层,但特异性较低,区分能力较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信