A Study of Surgery to Change Genitals in Humans (Transsexuals) according to Max Scheler

M. Pardosi, S. Maharani
{"title":"A Study of Surgery to Change Genitals in Humans (Transsexuals) according to Max Scheler","authors":"M. Pardosi, S. Maharani","doi":"10.35974/isc.v7i1.912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: One of the developments in modern science today is a surgery to change genitals in humans.  This has become an important issue in society because of the pros and cons. The most opposed groups are religious groups.  Some countries have legalized this action while others have not. The backgrounds of people deciding to change their genitals are twofold: first, because they feel they are in the “wrong body” where their behavior is contrary to the genitals they have.  Second, the development of genital devices is not perfect. That is why an axiology study needs to be made on the decision to change the genitals in humans. Axiology itself means the science or theory of the nature of values ​​which investigates values ​​in terms of their nature, their size, and their metaphysical status relating to their usefulness.  In axiology, Max Scheler gave four levels of value, namely: (1) The value of “enjoyment” or “pleasure” (agreeable) and “dislike” or “displeasure” (disagreeable); (2) The value of vitality or welfare or life (vital feeling); (3) Spiritual values; (4) Holiness or holy value. Of the four values ​​of Max Scheler, it was found that the decision to change the genitals in humans does not have the essence of any value except just the value of enjoyment or pleasure.   \nResult:That is, this kind of action actually denies the nature of existing values.  The value of enjoyment obtained through sex change surgery is actually only “mortal” or for a moment enjoyment because it is precisely the disappointment that appears at the end.  It is just the lowest value out of four.  \nDiscussion: Therefore, the author suggested that those who feel themselves trapped in the “wrong body” are better off doing psychiatric and religious therapy so that the nature of the values ​​that they have can be developed rather than making changes to the genitals.","PeriodicalId":7363,"journal":{"name":"Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v7i1.912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: One of the developments in modern science today is a surgery to change genitals in humans.  This has become an important issue in society because of the pros and cons. The most opposed groups are religious groups.  Some countries have legalized this action while others have not. The backgrounds of people deciding to change their genitals are twofold: first, because they feel they are in the “wrong body” where their behavior is contrary to the genitals they have.  Second, the development of genital devices is not perfect. That is why an axiology study needs to be made on the decision to change the genitals in humans. Axiology itself means the science or theory of the nature of values ​​which investigates values ​​in terms of their nature, their size, and their metaphysical status relating to their usefulness.  In axiology, Max Scheler gave four levels of value, namely: (1) The value of “enjoyment” or “pleasure” (agreeable) and “dislike” or “displeasure” (disagreeable); (2) The value of vitality or welfare or life (vital feeling); (3) Spiritual values; (4) Holiness or holy value. Of the four values ​​of Max Scheler, it was found that the decision to change the genitals in humans does not have the essence of any value except just the value of enjoyment or pleasure.   Result:That is, this kind of action actually denies the nature of existing values.  The value of enjoyment obtained through sex change surgery is actually only “mortal” or for a moment enjoyment because it is precisely the disappointment that appears at the end.  It is just the lowest value out of four.  Discussion: Therefore, the author suggested that those who feel themselves trapped in the “wrong body” are better off doing psychiatric and religious therapy so that the nature of the values ​​that they have can be developed rather than making changes to the genitals.
根据Max Scheler的说法,手术改变人类生殖器的研究(变性人)
导言:当今现代科学的发展之一是改变人类生殖器的手术。由于正反两方面的原因,这已经成为一个重要的社会问题。最反对的群体是宗教团体。一些国家已经将这种行为合法化,而另一些国家则没有。人们决定改变他们的生殖器的背景是双重的:首先,因为他们觉得他们在“错误的身体”中,他们的行为与他们的生殖器相反。第二,生殖器具的发展还不完善。这就是为什么需要对改变人类生殖器的决定进行价值论研究的原因。价值论本身意味着价值本质的科学或理论,它从价值的本质、大小以及与价值有用性相关的形而上学地位等方面来研究价值。在价值论中,谢勒给出了四个层次的价值,即:(1)“享受”或“快乐”(愉快)和“不喜欢”或“不愉快”(不愉快)的价值;(2)活力或福利或生命的价值(活力感);(3)精神价值;(4)圣洁或神圣价值。在马克斯·舍勒的四种价值观中,人们发现,改变人类生殖器的决定除了享受或愉悦的价值外,没有任何价值的本质。结果:即这种行为实际上否定了现有价值的本质。通过变性手术获得的享受价值,其实只是“凡人的”或一时的享受,因为它恰恰是最后出现的失望。它只是四个值中最低的一个。讨论:因此,作者建议,那些觉得自己被困在“错误的身体”里的人最好去做精神治疗和宗教治疗,这样他们所拥有的价值观的本质就可以得到发展,而不是改变生殖器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信