Stellate ganglia stimulation counteracts vagal stimulation by significantly increasing heart rate and blood pressure.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ammar M Killu, Mei Yang, Niyada Naksuk, Jason Tri, Xuping Li, Roshini Asirvatham, Samuel J Asirvatham, Yong-Mei Cha
{"title":"Stellate ganglia stimulation counteracts vagal stimulation by significantly increasing heart rate and blood pressure.","authors":"Ammar M Killu, Mei Yang, Niyada Naksuk, Jason Tri, Xuping Li, Roshini Asirvatham, Samuel J Asirvatham, Yong-Mei Cha","doi":"10.1007/s10840-023-01516-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the leading cause of syncope. The most frequent mechanism is that of a cardioinhibitory response, vasodepressor response, or mixture of both. Neural stimulation that negates or overcomes the effects of vagal tone may be used as a treatment strategy for VVS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six male canines were studied. Stimulation (10-Hz, 2 ms pulse duration, 2 min duration) of the cervical vagus (CV), thoracic vagus (TV), and stellate ganglia (SG) was performed using needle electrodes at 3 V, 5 V, and 10 V output. SG stimulation at an output of 10 V overlaying TV stimulation at the same output was performed. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and cardiac output (CO) were measured before, during, and after stimulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Right cervical vagal stimulation was associated with significant hemodynamic changes. HR, SBP, and DBP were reduced (107 ± 16 vs. 78 ± 15 bpm [P < 0.0001], 116 ± 24 vs. 107 ± 28 mmHg [P = 0.002] and 71 ± 18 vs. 58 ± 20 mmHg [P < 0.0001]), respectively, while left cervical vagal stimulation had minimal changes. CV stimulation was associated with greater hemodynamic changes than TV stimulation. Left and right SG stimulation significantly increased systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and HR at 5 V and 10 V, which could be observed within 30 s after stimulation. An output-dependent increase in hemodynamic parameters was seen with both left and right SG stimulation. No difference between left and right SG stimulation was seen. SG stimulation overlay significantly increased HR, BP, and CO from baseline vagal stimulation bilaterally.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stellate ganglia stimulation leads to increased HR and BP despite significant vagal stimulation. This may be exploited therapeutically in the management of vasovagal syncope.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"219-231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01516-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the leading cause of syncope. The most frequent mechanism is that of a cardioinhibitory response, vasodepressor response, or mixture of both. Neural stimulation that negates or overcomes the effects of vagal tone may be used as a treatment strategy for VVS.

Methods: Six male canines were studied. Stimulation (10-Hz, 2 ms pulse duration, 2 min duration) of the cervical vagus (CV), thoracic vagus (TV), and stellate ganglia (SG) was performed using needle electrodes at 3 V, 5 V, and 10 V output. SG stimulation at an output of 10 V overlaying TV stimulation at the same output was performed. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and cardiac output (CO) were measured before, during, and after stimulation.

Results: Right cervical vagal stimulation was associated with significant hemodynamic changes. HR, SBP, and DBP were reduced (107 ± 16 vs. 78 ± 15 bpm [P < 0.0001], 116 ± 24 vs. 107 ± 28 mmHg [P = 0.002] and 71 ± 18 vs. 58 ± 20 mmHg [P < 0.0001]), respectively, while left cervical vagal stimulation had minimal changes. CV stimulation was associated with greater hemodynamic changes than TV stimulation. Left and right SG stimulation significantly increased systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and HR at 5 V and 10 V, which could be observed within 30 s after stimulation. An output-dependent increase in hemodynamic parameters was seen with both left and right SG stimulation. No difference between left and right SG stimulation was seen. SG stimulation overlay significantly increased HR, BP, and CO from baseline vagal stimulation bilaterally.

Conclusions: Stellate ganglia stimulation leads to increased HR and BP despite significant vagal stimulation. This may be exploited therapeutically in the management of vasovagal syncope.

星状神经节刺激可显著提高心率和血压,从而抵消迷走神经刺激。
背景:血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)是晕厥的主要原因。最常见的机制是心脏抑制反应、血管抑制反应或两者的混合反应。否定或克服迷走神经张力影响的神经刺激可用作 VVS 的治疗策略:研究对象为六只雄性犬。方法:对六只雄性犬进行了研究。使用针状电极在 3 V、5 V 和 10 V 输出电压下对颈迷走神经(CV)、胸迷走神经(TV)和星状神经节(SG)进行刺激(10 Hz、2 ms 脉冲持续时间、2 分钟持续时间)。在 10 V 输出电压下刺激 SG 的同时,还以相同的输出电压刺激 TV。在刺激前、刺激中和刺激后测量了心率(HR)、血压(BP)和心输出量(CO):结果:右颈迷走神经刺激与显著的血液动力学变化有关。结果:右颈迷走神经刺激与明显的血流动力学变化有关,心率、SBP 和 DBP 均降低(107 ± 16 vs. 78 ± 15 bpm [P 结论:右颈迷走神经刺激可导致心率、SBP 和 DBP 降低(107 ± 16 vs. 78 ± 15 bpm尽管迷走神经刺激显著,但星状神经节刺激会导致心率和血压升高。这可用于血管迷走性晕厥的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信