Daniela G Domínguez, Hsiu-Lan Cheng, Lisa De La Rue
{"title":"Career Barriers and Coping Efficacy with International Students in Counseling Psychology Programs.","authors":"Daniela G Domínguez, Hsiu-Lan Cheng, Lisa De La Rue","doi":"10.1177/00110000221097358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study uses Lent et al.'s (1994) social cognitive career theory (SCCT) as a framework for understanding the career barriers and coping efficacy experienced by international master's of counseling psychology students. Grounded in SCCT, we described coping efficacy as international students' perceived capability to navigate career barriers. Using Braun and Clarke's (2006) thematic analysis, we explored the career barriers and coping efficacy of 12 international master's of counseling psychology students. The first focus area, International Journey with Multiple Barriers, included five themes: Interpersonal Stress, Language Barriers, Financial Pressures, Advising Concerns, and Visa and Immigration-Related Stress. The second focus area, Agents of Change in the Midst of Barriers, included five themes: Self-Regulating, Stepping into Discomfort, Cognitive Reappraising, Becoming a Change Agent, and Social Support Seeking. Findings demonstrated participants' coping efficacy and perceptions of themselves as agents of change. This study deepens the field's understanding of career development among international master's of counseling psychology students.</p>","PeriodicalId":48165,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837804/pdf/nihms-1860999.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000221097358","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This study uses Lent et al.'s (1994) social cognitive career theory (SCCT) as a framework for understanding the career barriers and coping efficacy experienced by international master's of counseling psychology students. Grounded in SCCT, we described coping efficacy as international students' perceived capability to navigate career barriers. Using Braun and Clarke's (2006) thematic analysis, we explored the career barriers and coping efficacy of 12 international master's of counseling psychology students. The first focus area, International Journey with Multiple Barriers, included five themes: Interpersonal Stress, Language Barriers, Financial Pressures, Advising Concerns, and Visa and Immigration-Related Stress. The second focus area, Agents of Change in the Midst of Barriers, included five themes: Self-Regulating, Stepping into Discomfort, Cognitive Reappraising, Becoming a Change Agent, and Social Support Seeking. Findings demonstrated participants' coping efficacy and perceptions of themselves as agents of change. This study deepens the field's understanding of career development among international master's of counseling psychology students.
本研究以Lent et al.(1994)的社会认知职业理论(SCCT)为框架,了解国际咨询心理学硕士学生的职业障碍和应对效能。基于SCCT,我们将应对效能描述为国际学生应对职业障碍的感知能力。运用Braun和Clarke(2006)的专题分析方法,对12名国际咨询心理学硕士研究生的职业障碍和应对效能进行了研究。第一个重点领域,多重障碍的国际旅行,包括五个主题:人际压力,语言障碍,财务压力,咨询问题,以及签证和移民相关的压力。第二个重点领域,障碍中的变革推动者,包括五个主题:自我调节,步入不适,认知重新评估,成为变革推动者,以及寻求社会支持。调查结果显示了参与者的应对效能和对自己作为变革推动者的看法。本研究加深了学界对国际心理咨询硕士学生职业发展的认识。
期刊介绍:
The Counseling Psychologist is the official publication of the Division of Counseling Psychology (Division 17) of the American Psychological Association. Each issue includes a major article or set of articles on a specific theme of importance to the theory, research, and practice of counseling psychology. In addition, articleas appear in the Forums that address professional issues, methodological and theoretical issues, and comments on previous publications in the journal.