A Home Education Service to Increase Knowledge of Treatment Options and Improve Attitudes to Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Orla Hobson, Jen Lumsdaine, Ahmed Sherif, Gabriel C Oniscu
{"title":"A Home Education Service to Increase Knowledge of Treatment Options and Improve Attitudes to Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.","authors":"Orla Hobson,&nbsp;Jen Lumsdaine,&nbsp;Ahmed Sherif,&nbsp;Gabriel C Oniscu","doi":"10.1177/15269248221145041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Lack of knowledge about living donor kidney transplant and difficulties in approaching potential donors constitute barriers for many patients and may contribute to inequality of access. <b>Project Aims:</b> Renal Education and Choices at Home was a UK single-centre pilot of home education; an initiative aiming to overcome barriers by increasing knowledge among patients and support networks and by facilitating living donation discussion in the patient's home. <b>Design:</b> This was a pre-post comparison of knowledge, attitude, and ability to communicate about transplant. Pre-visit knowledge about treatment options and attitudes towards transplant were measured using a validated questionnaire, repeated 4-6 weeks post-visit, to assess the session's impact, along with an evaluation survey, to determine how patients perceived the session. <b>Results:</b> From November 2018 to February 2020, a nurse specialist delivered living donor transplant education sessions in the homes of 86 patients, attended by 141 additional invitees. Home visits led to a significant improvement in knowledge about renal therapies, including living donor transplantation. The evaluation of the home visits by patients and invitees was overwhelmingly positive. Of the 86 patients visited, 46 (53%) had at least one potential donor initiating the assessment process following the visit. Overall, 78 potential donors initiated the assessment process. <b>Conclusion:</b> Home education contributed to addressing recognised barriers, in a way that was well received by patients and was novel in our health system. Home education may be particularly beneficial for patients affected by known barriers to living donor transplantation such as socio-economic deprivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":"33 1","pages":"95-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248221145041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lack of knowledge about living donor kidney transplant and difficulties in approaching potential donors constitute barriers for many patients and may contribute to inequality of access. Project Aims: Renal Education and Choices at Home was a UK single-centre pilot of home education; an initiative aiming to overcome barriers by increasing knowledge among patients and support networks and by facilitating living donation discussion in the patient's home. Design: This was a pre-post comparison of knowledge, attitude, and ability to communicate about transplant. Pre-visit knowledge about treatment options and attitudes towards transplant were measured using a validated questionnaire, repeated 4-6 weeks post-visit, to assess the session's impact, along with an evaluation survey, to determine how patients perceived the session. Results: From November 2018 to February 2020, a nurse specialist delivered living donor transplant education sessions in the homes of 86 patients, attended by 141 additional invitees. Home visits led to a significant improvement in knowledge about renal therapies, including living donor transplantation. The evaluation of the home visits by patients and invitees was overwhelmingly positive. Of the 86 patients visited, 46 (53%) had at least one potential donor initiating the assessment process following the visit. Overall, 78 potential donors initiated the assessment process. Conclusion: Home education contributed to addressing recognised barriers, in a way that was well received by patients and was novel in our health system. Home education may be particularly beneficial for patients affected by known barriers to living donor transplantation such as socio-economic deprivation.

家庭教育服务增加治疗选择的知识和改善对活体肾移植的态度。
对活体肾脏移植缺乏了解,难以接近潜在的捐赠者,这对许多患者构成了障碍,并可能导致获得不平等。项目目标:家庭肾脏教育和选择是英国单一中心家庭教育试点项目;该倡议旨在通过增加患者和支持网络之间的知识以及促进患者家中的活体捐赠讨论来克服障碍。设计:这是一个关于移植的知识、态度和沟通能力的前后比较。访问前对治疗方案的了解和对移植的态度使用有效的问卷进行测量,在访问后4-6周重复,以评估会话的影响,以及评估调查,以确定患者对会话的看法。结果:2018年11月至2020年2月,一名专科护士在86名患者家中进行了活体供体移植教育,另有141名受邀者参加。家访大大提高了对肾脏治疗的认识,包括活体供体移植。病人和受邀者对家访的评价非常积极。在访问的86例患者中,46例(53%)至少有一个潜在供体在访问后启动评估过程。总共有78个潜在捐助者发起了评估进程。结论:家庭教育有助于解决公认的障碍,这种方式受到患者的好评,在我们的卫生系统中是新颖的。家庭教育可能对那些受到诸如社会经济贫困等已知障碍影响的患者特别有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信