Genicular Artery Embolization Data Review

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Aiden M. O'Grady MBChB, Mark W. Little FRCR
{"title":"Genicular Artery Embolization Data Review","authors":"Aiden M. O'Grady MBChB,&nbsp;Mark W. Little FRCR","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2022.100880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Osteoarthritis<span> of the knee poses an ever-expanding healthcare challenge worldwide. Current treatments include conservative methods such as weight loss, pharmacological treatments including </span></span>NSAIDs<span>, and surgical techniques including total knee arthroplasty. Although frequently successful, contraindications and failure of pharmacological agents leave many, especially with mild-moderate disease, without effective treatment. Genicular </span></span>artery embolization<span><span><span><span> is an interventional radiology technique being developed to fill this treatment gap. For this procedure to become established, the literature must provide evidence of its underlying scientific principles, safety, efficacy and economic viability. Pathological investigation of osteoarthritis reveals that low-level inflammation plays a crucial role in disease development. Joint inflammation stimulates neoangiogenesis and accompanying neuronal growth, with the degree of microvascular invasion being correlated with more severe pain in animal models. These neovessels provide a target for </span>embolization<span> however, the microscopic effects of this intervention are yet to be elucidated. The side effects of GAE have been extensively investigated with no severe adverse events being recorded. Skin discoloration<span> and puncture site hematoma are the most common, occurring in 10%-65% and 0%-17% of patients respectively. The literature also discusses ways to minimize these events. Phase one studies provide promising evidence of efficacy, demonstrating an 80% improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a mean difference of 36.8 in </span></span></span>Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at 24-months. These positive signals are also supported by a single </span>randomized control trial. A single study has been completed regarding the cost of GAE, however further work is needed. The GAE literature demonstrates a safe procedure with promising initial evidence of efficacy. Future work should further elucidate the pathology of osteoarthritis and ways in which embolization modifies this process, alongside providing further randomized control evidence that aligns with the recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The future of GAE is exciting!</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 1","pages":"Article 100880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1089251622000865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Osteoarthritis of the knee poses an ever-expanding healthcare challenge worldwide. Current treatments include conservative methods such as weight loss, pharmacological treatments including NSAIDs, and surgical techniques including total knee arthroplasty. Although frequently successful, contraindications and failure of pharmacological agents leave many, especially with mild-moderate disease, without effective treatment. Genicular artery embolization is an interventional radiology technique being developed to fill this treatment gap. For this procedure to become established, the literature must provide evidence of its underlying scientific principles, safety, efficacy and economic viability. Pathological investigation of osteoarthritis reveals that low-level inflammation plays a crucial role in disease development. Joint inflammation stimulates neoangiogenesis and accompanying neuronal growth, with the degree of microvascular invasion being correlated with more severe pain in animal models. These neovessels provide a target for embolization however, the microscopic effects of this intervention are yet to be elucidated. The side effects of GAE have been extensively investigated with no severe adverse events being recorded. Skin discoloration and puncture site hematoma are the most common, occurring in 10%-65% and 0%-17% of patients respectively. The literature also discusses ways to minimize these events. Phase one studies provide promising evidence of efficacy, demonstrating an 80% improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a mean difference of 36.8 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at 24-months. These positive signals are also supported by a single randomized control trial. A single study has been completed regarding the cost of GAE, however further work is needed. The GAE literature demonstrates a safe procedure with promising initial evidence of efficacy. Future work should further elucidate the pathology of osteoarthritis and ways in which embolization modifies this process, alongside providing further randomized control evidence that aligns with the recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The future of GAE is exciting!

膝动脉栓塞数据回顾
膝关节骨关节炎是全球范围内不断扩大的医疗保健挑战。目前的治疗方法包括保守方法,如减肥,药物治疗,包括非甾体抗炎药,和手术技术,包括全膝关节置换术。虽然经常成功,但禁忌症和药理学药物的失败使许多人,特别是轻中度疾病,没有有效的治疗。膝动脉栓塞术是一种介入放射学技术,旨在填补这一治疗空白。为了使该程序得以建立,文献必须提供其潜在的科学原理、安全性、有效性和经济可行性的证据。骨关节炎的病理研究表明,低水平炎症在疾病发展中起着至关重要的作用。关节炎症刺激新生血管生成和伴随的神经元生长,在动物模型中微血管侵袭的程度与更严重的疼痛相关。这些新生血管为栓塞提供了靶点,然而,这种干预的微观效果尚未阐明。GAE的副作用已被广泛调查,没有记录严重的不良事件。皮肤变色和穿刺部位血肿最为常见,发生率分别为10%-65%和0%-17%。文献还讨论了将这些事件最小化的方法。一期研究提供了有希望的疗效证据,显示视觉模拟量表(VAS)改善了80%,西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分在24个月时的平均差异为36.8。这些积极信号也得到了一项随机对照试验的支持。一项关于GAE成本的研究已经完成,但还需要进一步的工作。GAE文献证明了一种安全的程序和有希望的初步疗效证据。未来的工作应该进一步阐明骨关节炎的病理和栓塞改变这一过程的方式,同时提供进一步的随机对照证据,与国家健康与护理卓越研究所的建议一致。GAE的未来是令人兴奋的!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Interventional radiology is an area of clinical diagnosis and management that is highly technique-oriented. Therefore, the format of this quarterly journal, which combines the visual impact of an atlas with the currency of a journal, lends itself perfectly to presenting the topics. Each issue is guest edited by a leader in the field and is focused on a single clinical technique or problem. The presentation is enhanced by superb illustrations and descriptive narrative outlining the steps of a particular procedure. Interventional radiologists, neuroradiologists, vascular surgeons and neurosurgeons will find this a useful addition to the clinical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信