Background conditions for an urban greenhouse gas network in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan region.

IF 5.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anna Karion, Israel Lopez-Coto, Sharon M Gourdji, Kimberly Mueller, Subhomoy Ghosh, William Callahan, Michael Stock, Elizabeth DiGangi, Steve Prinzivalli, James Whetstone
{"title":"Background conditions for an urban greenhouse gas network in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan region.","authors":"Anna Karion,&nbsp;Israel Lopez-Coto,&nbsp;Sharon M Gourdji,&nbsp;Kimberly Mueller,&nbsp;Subhomoy Ghosh,&nbsp;William Callahan,&nbsp;Michael Stock,&nbsp;Elizabeth DiGangi,&nbsp;Steve Prinzivalli,&nbsp;James Whetstone","doi":"10.5194/acp-21-6257-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As city governments take steps towards establishing emissions reduction targets, the atmospheric research community is increasingly able to assist in tracking emissions reductions. Researchers have established systems for observing atmospheric greenhouse gases in urban areas with the aim of attributing greenhouse gas concentration enhancements (and thus, emissions) to the region in question. However, to attribute enhancements to a particular region, one must isolate the component of the observed concentration attributable to fluxes inside the region by removing the background, which is the component due to fluxes outside. In this study, we demonstrate methods to construct several versions of a background for our carbon dioxide and methane observing network in the Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD metropolitan region. Some of these versions rely on transport and flux models, while others are based on observations upwind of the domain. First, we evaluate the backgrounds in a synthetic data framework, then we evaluate against real observations from our urban network. We find that backgrounds based on upwind observations capture the variability better than model-based backgrounds, although care must be taken to avoid bias from biospheric carbon dioxide fluxes near background stations in summer. Model-based backgrounds also perform well when upwind fluxes can be modeled accurately. Our study evaluates different background methods and provides guidance determining background methodology that can impact the design of urban monitoring networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":8611,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics","volume":"21 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982866/pdf/nihms-1873186.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6257-2021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

As city governments take steps towards establishing emissions reduction targets, the atmospheric research community is increasingly able to assist in tracking emissions reductions. Researchers have established systems for observing atmospheric greenhouse gases in urban areas with the aim of attributing greenhouse gas concentration enhancements (and thus, emissions) to the region in question. However, to attribute enhancements to a particular region, one must isolate the component of the observed concentration attributable to fluxes inside the region by removing the background, which is the component due to fluxes outside. In this study, we demonstrate methods to construct several versions of a background for our carbon dioxide and methane observing network in the Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD metropolitan region. Some of these versions rely on transport and flux models, while others are based on observations upwind of the domain. First, we evaluate the backgrounds in a synthetic data framework, then we evaluate against real observations from our urban network. We find that backgrounds based on upwind observations capture the variability better than model-based backgrounds, although care must be taken to avoid bias from biospheric carbon dioxide fluxes near background stations in summer. Model-based backgrounds also perform well when upwind fluxes can be modeled accurately. Our study evaluates different background methods and provides guidance determining background methodology that can impact the design of urban monitoring networks.

华盛顿特区和巴尔的摩都市圈城市温室气体网络的背景条件。
随着城市政府逐步建立减排目标,大气研究界越来越有能力协助跟踪减排情况。研究人员已经建立了观测城市地区大气温室气体的系统,目的是将温室气体浓度的增加(以及由此产生的排放)归因于相关地区。然而,为了将增强归因于特定区域,必须通过去除背景来隔离归因于区域内通量的观测浓度成分,背景是归因于外部通量的成分。在本研究中,我们展示了为我们在华盛顿特区和马里兰州巴尔的摩大都会地区的二氧化碳和甲烷观测网络构建几个版本背景的方法。其中一些版本依赖于传输和通量模型,而其他版本则基于逆风区域的观测。首先,我们在一个合成数据框架中评估背景,然后我们根据我们城市网络的真实观测进行评估。我们发现,基于逆风观测的背景比基于模式的背景更能捕捉到变率,但必须注意避免夏季背景站附近生物圈二氧化碳通量的偏差。当逆风通量能够被准确模拟时,基于模型的背景也表现良好。我们的研究评估了不同的背景方法,并为确定影响城市监测网络设计的背景方法提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
20.60%
发文量
702
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) is a not-for-profit international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and public discussion of high-quality studies investigating the Earth''s atmosphere and the underlying chemical and physical processes. It covers the altitude range from the land and ocean surface up to the turbopause, including the troposphere, stratosphere, and mesosphere. The main subject areas comprise atmospheric modelling, field measurements, remote sensing, and laboratory studies of gases, aerosols, clouds and precipitation, isotopes, radiation, dynamics, biosphere interactions, and hydrosphere interactions. The journal scope is focused on studies with general implications for atmospheric science rather than investigations that are primarily of local or technical interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信