VIDEO VLOG AS TEACHING MEDIA IN IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY IN PROCEDURE TEXT

Anisa Juni Fidriani, E. Prastikawati, AB Prabowo, Kusumo Adi
{"title":"VIDEO VLOG AS TEACHING MEDIA IN IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY IN PROCEDURE TEXT","authors":"Anisa Juni Fidriani, E. Prastikawati, AB Prabowo, Kusumo Adi","doi":"10.56874/jeel.v2i2.531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Speaking is one important skill of English to present opinions, ideas, and convey our feeling to other people. Based on my observation teaching practicum in a vocational school, the students speaking ability have less confidence in practicing English speaking. Except for the students’ problem in speaking teacher’s media in the classroom also influence the process of teaching and learning. The use of conventional media is still found in the process of teaching speaking in class. The writer will focus on her research in improving students speaking skills by using media is Vlog. The purpose of this study is 1. To what extent student’s speaking ability taught without using video vlogs in procedure text? 2. To what extent student’s speaking ability taught using vlogs in procedure text? 3. Is there any significant difference between students speaking ability taught using vlogs in procedure text and those taught without using vlogs in procedure text?. The design of this study is quasi-experimental. The data were gathered through quantitative data. The writer takes XI AKL 2 as a control class and  XI AKL 1 as an experimental class. The research instrument is a test. There are two types of tests given, namely pre-test and post-test. After collecting data, there are significant differences between the classes taught using video vlogs and the classes taught without video vlog. The results of the study can be seen on the post-test after giving treatment. Were the mean score pre-test was 57.11 which was classified as unsatisfactory and the mean score post-test was 70.67 which was classified as good. The result of the sig 2 tailed was 0.00. If the value of sig ( 2 tailed) < 0.05 then there is a significant difference between the learning outcomes taught without using video vlog between taught using video vlog meanwhile, the value of sig (2 tailed) was 0.000 < 0.005. So it can be concluded that there was a significant difference between the students speaking skills taught using video vlog.","PeriodicalId":56238,"journal":{"name":"JEELS Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEELS Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56874/jeel.v2i2.531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Speaking is one important skill of English to present opinions, ideas, and convey our feeling to other people. Based on my observation teaching practicum in a vocational school, the students speaking ability have less confidence in practicing English speaking. Except for the students’ problem in speaking teacher’s media in the classroom also influence the process of teaching and learning. The use of conventional media is still found in the process of teaching speaking in class. The writer will focus on her research in improving students speaking skills by using media is Vlog. The purpose of this study is 1. To what extent student’s speaking ability taught without using video vlogs in procedure text? 2. To what extent student’s speaking ability taught using vlogs in procedure text? 3. Is there any significant difference between students speaking ability taught using vlogs in procedure text and those taught without using vlogs in procedure text?. The design of this study is quasi-experimental. The data were gathered through quantitative data. The writer takes XI AKL 2 as a control class and  XI AKL 1 as an experimental class. The research instrument is a test. There are two types of tests given, namely pre-test and post-test. After collecting data, there are significant differences between the classes taught using video vlogs and the classes taught without video vlog. The results of the study can be seen on the post-test after giving treatment. Were the mean score pre-test was 57.11 which was classified as unsatisfactory and the mean score post-test was 70.67 which was classified as good. The result of the sig 2 tailed was 0.00. If the value of sig ( 2 tailed) < 0.05 then there is a significant difference between the learning outcomes taught without using video vlog between taught using video vlog meanwhile, the value of sig (2 tailed) was 0.000 < 0.005. So it can be concluded that there was a significant difference between the students speaking skills taught using video vlog.
视频日志作为教学媒介在提高学生程序文本口语能力中的作用
口语是一项重要的英语技能,可以向他人表达观点、想法和表达我们的感受。根据我在一所职校的观察教学实习,学生的口语能力在练习英语口语时缺乏信心。除了学生在课堂上说话的问题外,教师的媒介也影响着教学过程。在课堂口语教学过程中,传统媒体的使用仍然存在。作者将重点研究如何利用Vlog媒体来提高学生的口语能力。本研究的目的是:1。在程序文本中不使用视频日志的情况下,学生的口语能力教学到什么程度?2. 在程序文本中使用vlog教学学生的口语能力到什么程度?3.使用程序文本视频日志教学的学生与不使用程序文本视频日志教学的学生的口语能力是否有显著差异?本研究设计为准实验设计。数据是通过定量数据收集的。研究仪器是一个测试。有两种类型的测试,即前测试和后测试。收集数据后,使用视频日志授课的班级与不使用视频日志授课的班级之间存在显著差异。研究的结果可以在给予治疗后的后测中看到。前测均分为57.11分,为不满意;后测均分为70.67分,为良好。sig 2的结果为0.00。如果sig(2尾)的值< 0.05,则不使用视频日志教学的学习成果与使用视频日志教学的学习成果之间存在显著差异,同时sig(2尾)的值为0.000 < 0.005。因此,可以得出结论,使用视频日志教学的学生的口语技能存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信