Comparing the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy and Positive Psychotherapy on Sleep Quality in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Q4 Medicine
Seyyed Hadi Rafiee, S. Taklavi, A. Abolghasemi, H. Hatamian
{"title":"Comparing the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy and Positive Psychotherapy on Sleep Quality in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis","authors":"Seyyed Hadi Rafiee, S. Taklavi, A. Abolghasemi, H. Hatamian","doi":"10.32598/cjns.7.25.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common neurological diseases that severely affects the patients‘ quality of sleep. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of reality therapy and positive psychotherapy on sleep quality in women with MS. Materials & Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental with a pre-test, post-test design and a control group. The study population included all women with MS referred to the Guilan MS Association in the summer and fall of 2019 who were selected by purposive sampling method. They were randomly assigned in three groups of 15 people for reality therapy training, positive psychotherapy, and control group. Both experimental groups received eight 90-minute sessions of psychotherapy interventions, but the control group received no training. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to collect data. Data analysis was performed by Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) and Bonferroni post hoc test in SPSS version 22. Results: Both reality therapy and positive psychotherapy significantly improved sleep quality in women with MS (P<0.01). Also, based on the results, the sleep quality of the reality therapy group showed a greater and more significant improvement compared to the positive treatment (F=19.43, P<0.01). Conclusion: According to the obtained results, both methods have good practical capabilities for clinical interventions to improve sleep quality in patients with MS. Reality therapy is more effective than positive psychotherapy on the quality of sleep in women with MS.","PeriodicalId":31302,"journal":{"name":"Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/cjns.7.25.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common neurological diseases that severely affects the patients‘ quality of sleep. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of reality therapy and positive psychotherapy on sleep quality in women with MS. Materials & Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental with a pre-test, post-test design and a control group. The study population included all women with MS referred to the Guilan MS Association in the summer and fall of 2019 who were selected by purposive sampling method. They were randomly assigned in three groups of 15 people for reality therapy training, positive psychotherapy, and control group. Both experimental groups received eight 90-minute sessions of psychotherapy interventions, but the control group received no training. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to collect data. Data analysis was performed by Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) and Bonferroni post hoc test in SPSS version 22. Results: Both reality therapy and positive psychotherapy significantly improved sleep quality in women with MS (P<0.01). Also, based on the results, the sleep quality of the reality therapy group showed a greater and more significant improvement compared to the positive treatment (F=19.43, P<0.01). Conclusion: According to the obtained results, both methods have good practical capabilities for clinical interventions to improve sleep quality in patients with MS. Reality therapy is more effective than positive psychotherapy on the quality of sleep in women with MS.
现实疗法与积极心理疗法对多发性硬化症患者睡眠质量的影响比较
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)是严重影响患者睡眠质量的最常见的神经系统疾病之一。目的:比较现实治疗与积极心理治疗对多发性硬化症女性睡眠质量的影响。材料与方法:采用准实验方法,采用前测、后测设计和对照组。研究人群包括2019年夏季和秋季通过有目的抽样方法选择的桂兰多发性硬化症协会的所有多发性硬化症女性。他们被随机分为三组,每组15人,分别接受现实治疗训练、积极心理治疗和对照组。两个实验组都接受了8次90分钟的心理治疗干预,但对照组没有接受任何训练。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)收集数据。数据分析采用SPSS version 22多元协方差分析(MANCOVA)和Bonferroni事后检验。结果:现实治疗和积极心理治疗均能显著改善MS患者的睡眠质量(P<0.01)。结果显示,现实治疗组的睡眠质量比积极治疗组有更大、更显著的改善(F=19.43, P<0.01)。结论:根据所获得的结果,两种方法对改善MS患者睡眠质量的临床干预均具有较好的实用能力,现实疗法对MS女性睡眠质量的改善效果优于积极心理治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences
Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences Neuroscience-Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书