Survival Rate and Cervical Bone Loss of Dental Implants Placed in Regenerated Areas with Free Iliac Graft.

Gholamreza Shirani, Mahboubeh Hashemi Nasab, Shahryar Bashiri, Sheida Kordi
{"title":"Survival Rate and Cervical Bone Loss of Dental Implants Placed in Regenerated Areas with Free Iliac Graft.","authors":"Gholamreza Shirani,&nbsp;Mahboubeh Hashemi Nasab,&nbsp;Shahryar Bashiri,&nbsp;Sheida Kordi","doi":"10.30476/DENTJODS.2022.90184.1474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of the problem: </strong>For many years, practitioners have been encountered with dental rehabilitation of atrophic jaws. Among many of alternatives, free iliac graft can be a reasonable and also problematic choice to be accomplished.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the implant survival rate and bone loss in implants inserted in reconstructed jaws with free iliac graft.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>In this clinical trial study, twelve patients that underwent bone reconstruction with free iliac graft were included in this retrospective study. The patients underwent surgery over a 6-year period from September 2011 to July 2017. Panoramic images were taken immediately after implant insertion and at the follow-up session. The parameters that were assessed included implant survival rate, bone level changes, and surrounding tissue conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and nine implants were placed in eight female and four male patients, of which 65 (59.6%) were inserted in the reconstructed maxilla and 44 (40.3%) in the reconstructed mandible. The interval between the reconstruction surgery and follow-up session was 28.75 months and the mean interval between implant insertion and the follow-up session was 21.75 months, ranging from 6 to 72 months. The total average of crestal bone resorption was 2.44 mm (range: 0 to 5.43 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants placed in free iliac graft was associated with acceptable marginal bone loss, survival rate, satisfaction, and esthetic results among the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","volume":"24 1","pages":"53-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2022.90184.1474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of the problem: For many years, practitioners have been encountered with dental rehabilitation of atrophic jaws. Among many of alternatives, free iliac graft can be a reasonable and also problematic choice to be accomplished.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implant survival rate and bone loss in implants inserted in reconstructed jaws with free iliac graft.

Materials and method: In this clinical trial study, twelve patients that underwent bone reconstruction with free iliac graft were included in this retrospective study. The patients underwent surgery over a 6-year period from September 2011 to July 2017. Panoramic images were taken immediately after implant insertion and at the follow-up session. The parameters that were assessed included implant survival rate, bone level changes, and surrounding tissue conditions.

Results: One hundred and nine implants were placed in eight female and four male patients, of which 65 (59.6%) were inserted in the reconstructed maxilla and 44 (40.3%) in the reconstructed mandible. The interval between the reconstruction surgery and follow-up session was 28.75 months and the mean interval between implant insertion and the follow-up session was 21.75 months, ranging from 6 to 72 months. The total average of crestal bone resorption was 2.44 mm (range: 0 to 5.43 mm).

Conclusion: This study found that rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants placed in free iliac graft was associated with acceptable marginal bone loss, survival rate, satisfaction, and esthetic results among the patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

游离髂骨再生区植牙的存活率和颈椎骨丢失。
问题的陈述:多年来,从业者已经遇到了萎缩颌骨的牙科康复。在许多替代方案中,游离髂骨移植可能是一个合理的选择,但也是一个有问题的选择。目的:研究游离髂骨重建颌内种植体的成活率和骨丢失情况。材料与方法:本临床研究回顾性分析了12例髂骨游离移植骨重建患者。这些患者在2011年9月至2017年7月的6年时间里接受了手术。在植入后和随访期间立即拍摄全景图像。评估的参数包括种植体存活率、骨水平变化和周围组织状况。结果:女性8例,男性4例,共植入种植体109个,其中上颌重建种植体65个(59.6%),下颌骨重建种植体44个(40.3%)。重建手术至随访的时间间隔为28.75个月,植入种植体至随访的平均时间间隔为21.75个月,范围为6 ~ 72个月。牙冠骨吸收总量平均为2.44 mm(范围:0 ~ 5.43 mm)。结论:本研究发现游离髂骨种植体修复萎缩颌骨患者的边缘骨丢失、生存率、满意度和美观效果均可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信