Double Dipping in Hybrid Open Access – Chimera or Reality?

Bernhard Mittermaier
{"title":"Double Dipping in Hybrid Open Access – Chimera or Reality?","authors":"Bernhard Mittermaier","doi":"10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-SOCSCI.AOWNTU.V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pros and cons of hybrid open access are heavily disputed. A main point of discussion is whether ‘double dipping’ takes place, i.e. paying twice to publish and read the same article. To examine publishers’ assertions that they do not double dip, a survey was conducted of 24 publishers with detailed questions about their pricing policy using hypothetical examples of hybrid open access publication in their journals. The outcome is quite sobering: while a small number of publishers appear to be fully offsetting their hybrid open access income, or making no additional charge for hybrid open access at all, for the rest of those surveyed no clear evidence could be gathered that double dipping does not take place, and many appeared to be double dipping to some extent.","PeriodicalId":91169,"journal":{"name":"ScienceOpen research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ScienceOpen research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-SOCSCI.AOWNTU.V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The pros and cons of hybrid open access are heavily disputed. A main point of discussion is whether ‘double dipping’ takes place, i.e. paying twice to publish and read the same article. To examine publishers’ assertions that they do not double dip, a survey was conducted of 24 publishers with detailed questions about their pricing policy using hypothetical examples of hybrid open access publication in their journals. The outcome is quite sobering: while a small number of publishers appear to be fully offsetting their hybrid open access income, or making no additional charge for hybrid open access at all, for the rest of those surveyed no clear evidence could be gathered that double dipping does not take place, and many appeared to be double dipping to some extent.
混合开放存取的双重尝试——幻想还是现实?
混合开放获取的利弊存在很大争议。讨论的一个主要问题是“双重收费”是否存在,即为发表和阅读同一篇文章支付两次费用。为了检验出版商关于他们没有二次探底的断言,对24家出版商进行了一项调查,并对他们的定价政策提出了详细的问题,并在他们的期刊中使用了假设的混合开放获取出版物的例子。结果相当令人警醒:虽然少数出版商似乎完全抵消了他们的混合开放获取收入,或者根本不收取混合开放获取的额外费用,但对于其余的受访者来说,没有明确的证据表明双重收费没有发生,而且许多出版商在某种程度上似乎是双重收费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信