Attitudes and the Prediction of Social Conduct

A. Davey
{"title":"Attitudes and the Prediction of Social Conduct","authors":"A. Davey","doi":"10.1111/J.2044-8260.1976.TB00002.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both theories and definitions of attitudes have been strongly influenced by the belief that the ultimate validating referent of an attitude is behaviour. Nevertheless, the yield from some 50 or more years of research which has sought to establish that a knowledge of an individual's verbally expressed attitudes would enable one to predict his conduct has been meagre. This paper attempts to clarify some of the conceptual issues involved in the prediction of action from psychological events, in particular those associated with the dispositional or latent process concept of attitudes. It is argued that the wrong sort of explanatory work has been demanded from the concept of attitude. In stable social settings, where some success has been achieved in establishing a degree of attitude-behaviour congruence, an equally accurate prediction could probably be made without reference to attitudes. In shifting social contexts, where repeatedly predictions from attitudes have failed to come off, an inquiry into attitudes is likely to be fruitful, not because there could be a simple deterministic relationship between attitudes and conduct, but because it could contribute to our understanding of the interaction between social change and individual choice.","PeriodicalId":76614,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of social and clinical psychology","volume":"55 1","pages":"11-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of social and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8260.1976.TB00002.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Both theories and definitions of attitudes have been strongly influenced by the belief that the ultimate validating referent of an attitude is behaviour. Nevertheless, the yield from some 50 or more years of research which has sought to establish that a knowledge of an individual's verbally expressed attitudes would enable one to predict his conduct has been meagre. This paper attempts to clarify some of the conceptual issues involved in the prediction of action from psychological events, in particular those associated with the dispositional or latent process concept of attitudes. It is argued that the wrong sort of explanatory work has been demanded from the concept of attitude. In stable social settings, where some success has been achieved in establishing a degree of attitude-behaviour congruence, an equally accurate prediction could probably be made without reference to attitudes. In shifting social contexts, where repeatedly predictions from attitudes have failed to come off, an inquiry into attitudes is likely to be fruitful, not because there could be a simple deterministic relationship between attitudes and conduct, but because it could contribute to our understanding of the interaction between social change and individual choice.
态度与社会行为的预测
态度的理论和定义都受到一种信念的强烈影响,即态度的最终验证参照是行为。然而,50多年来的研究试图证明,通过了解一个人口头表达的态度,就能预测他的行为,但结果却很少。本文试图澄清一些涉及从心理事件预测行为的概念问题,特别是那些与态度的倾向或潜在过程概念相关的问题。有人认为,对态度概念的解释是错误的。在稳定的社会环境中,在建立某种程度的态度-行为一致性方面取得了一些成功,在不参考态度的情况下,可能会做出同样准确的预测。在不断变化的社会环境中,从态度中反复做出的预测都失败了,对态度的调查很可能是富有成效的,不是因为态度和行为之间可能存在简单的确定性关系,而是因为它有助于我们理解社会变化和个人选择之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信