Toward the Definition of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Matthias Amprosi, Elisabetta Indelicato, Andreas Eigentler, Josef Fritz, Wolfgang Nachbauer, Sylvia Boesch
{"title":"Toward the Definition of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.","authors":"Matthias Amprosi,&nbsp;Elisabetta Indelicato,&nbsp;Andreas Eigentler,&nbsp;Josef Fritz,&nbsp;Wolfgang Nachbauer,&nbsp;Sylvia Boesch","doi":"10.1212/NXG.0000000000200052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are a heterogeneous group of rare neurodegenerative diseases, characterized by a progressive spastic paraparesis. Currently, there is a HSP-specific clinician-reported outcome measure (CROM) called Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS). There are, however, no specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for HSP. In the present cohort study, we prospectively follow up a well-examined Austrian HSP cohort using validated rating scales and compared PROM with disease-specific and non-disease-specific CROM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were recruited and followed up at the Center for Rare Movement Disorders, Innsbruck, Austria. CROM included the SPRS, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Barthel Index (BI), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). PROM included the EQ-5D questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated for all scales at follow-up (FU) after 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 patients (36 males) with HSP were included in the study. FU was performed for 30 patients (21 males). Apart from females reporting more problems in the EQ-5D domain of anxiety and depression (<i>p</i> = 0.008), other clinician-reported outcomes (CROs) or patient-reported outcomes (PROs) did not differ significantly across sex. SPRS showed significant correlations with SARA (<i>p</i> < 0.001), mainly driven by the gait item, as well as the BI. Although SPRS did not correlate with EQ-5D visual analogue scale and PHQ-9 scores, several EQ-5D domains correlated significantly with SPRS. At FU, SPRS showed the highest responsiveness (SRM 1.11), followed by SARA (SRM 0.47). Neither MMSE nor PRO significantly increased at FU.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study, we present an Austrian cohort of patients with HSP and a prospective study evaluating correlations of CRO and PRO as well as their progression. Demographics from our cohort are comparable with several other European cohort studies. Our data highlight the capabilities of the SPRS to show clinical progression and warrant consideration of ataxia rating scales such as SARA in HSP cohorts. We also show that the generic PROMs are not suitable to detect change in HSP, and thus, we propose to create a disease-specific PROM fully depicting the effect of HSP on the patients' lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48613,"journal":{"name":"Neurology-Genetics","volume":"9 1","pages":"e200052"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/44/NXG-2022-200055.PMC9832334.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000200052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and objectives: Hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are a heterogeneous group of rare neurodegenerative diseases, characterized by a progressive spastic paraparesis. Currently, there is a HSP-specific clinician-reported outcome measure (CROM) called Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS). There are, however, no specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for HSP. In the present cohort study, we prospectively follow up a well-examined Austrian HSP cohort using validated rating scales and compared PROM with disease-specific and non-disease-specific CROM.

Methods: Patients were recruited and followed up at the Center for Rare Movement Disorders, Innsbruck, Austria. CROM included the SPRS, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Barthel Index (BI), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). PROM included the EQ-5D questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated for all scales at follow-up (FU) after 1 year.

Results: A total of 55 patients (36 males) with HSP were included in the study. FU was performed for 30 patients (21 males). Apart from females reporting more problems in the EQ-5D domain of anxiety and depression (p = 0.008), other clinician-reported outcomes (CROs) or patient-reported outcomes (PROs) did not differ significantly across sex. SPRS showed significant correlations with SARA (p < 0.001), mainly driven by the gait item, as well as the BI. Although SPRS did not correlate with EQ-5D visual analogue scale and PHQ-9 scores, several EQ-5D domains correlated significantly with SPRS. At FU, SPRS showed the highest responsiveness (SRM 1.11), followed by SARA (SRM 0.47). Neither MMSE nor PRO significantly increased at FU.

Discussion: In this study, we present an Austrian cohort of patients with HSP and a prospective study evaluating correlations of CRO and PRO as well as their progression. Demographics from our cohort are comparable with several other European cohort studies. Our data highlight the capabilities of the SPRS to show clinical progression and warrant consideration of ataxia rating scales such as SARA in HSP cohorts. We also show that the generic PROMs are not suitable to detect change in HSP, and thus, we propose to create a disease-specific PROM fully depicting the effect of HSP on the patients' lives.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

遗传性痉挛性截瘫患者报告结果测量的定义探讨。
背景和目的:遗传性痉挛性截瘫(HSPs)是一种异质性的罕见神经退行性疾病,以进行性痉挛性截瘫为特征。目前,有一种针对hsp的临床报告结果测量(CROM),称为痉挛性截瘫评定量表(SPRS)。然而,对于HSP没有特定的患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。在当前的队列研究中,我们使用有效的评分量表对一个经过充分检查的奥地利HSP队列进行前瞻性随访,并将PROM与疾病特异性和非疾病特异性CROM进行比较。方法:在奥地利因斯布鲁克的罕见运动障碍中心招募并随访患者。CROM包括SPRS、共济失调评定量表(SARA)、Barthel指数(BI)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)。PROM包括EQ-5D问卷和患者健康问卷9 (PHQ-9)。在随访1年后计算所有量表的标准化反应均值(SRMs)。结果:共纳入55例HSP患者(男性36例)。30例患者行FU手术,其中男性21例。除了女性在焦虑和抑郁的EQ-5D领域报告更多的问题(p = 0.008),其他临床报告的结果(cro)或患者报告的结果(PROs)在性别之间没有显著差异。SPRS与SARA呈显著相关(p < 0.001),主要由步态项目和BI驱动。虽然SPRS与EQ-5D视觉模拟量表和PHQ-9评分没有相关性,但EQ-5D的几个结构域与SPRS显著相关。在FU时,SPRS的反应性最高(SRM 1.11),其次是SARA (SRM 0.47)。FU组MMSE和PRO均未显著升高。讨论:在这项研究中,我们介绍了一组奥地利HSP患者,并进行了一项前瞻性研究,评估CRO和PRO的相关性及其进展。我们队列的人口统计数据与其他几个欧洲队列研究具有可比性。我们的数据强调了SPRS显示临床进展的能力,并且值得考虑在HSP队列中使用共济失调评分量表(如SARA)。我们还表明,通用PROM不适合检测热休克蛋白的变化,因此,我们建议创建一个疾病特异性PROM,充分描述热休克蛋白对患者生活的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology-Genetics
Neurology-Genetics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology: Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. Original articles in all areas of neurogenetics will be published including rare and common genetic variation, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease-genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. This will include studies reporting on genetic disease risk and pharmacogenomics. In addition, Neurology: Genetics will publish results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology: Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials are welcome, including well-powered studies reporting negative results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信