Land cover classification based optical satellite images using machine learning algorithms

Arisetra Razafinimaro, A. R. Hajalalaina, H. Rakotonirainy, Reziky Zafimarina
{"title":"Land cover classification based optical satellite images using machine learning algorithms","authors":"Arisetra Razafinimaro, A. R. Hajalalaina, H. Rakotonirainy, Reziky Zafimarina","doi":"10.26555/ijain.v8i3.803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to apply machine learning algorithms to the supervised classification of optical satellite images. Indeed, the latter is efficient in the study of land use. Despite the performance of machine learning in satellite image processing, this can change but depends on the nature of the satellite images used. Moreover, when we use the satellite, then the reliability of one classifier can be different from the others. In this paper, we examined the performance of DT, SVM, KNN, ANN, and RF. Analysis factors were used to investigate further their importance for Sentinel 2, Landsat 8, Terra Modis, and Spot 5 images. The results show that the KNN showed the most interesting accuracy during the analysis of medium and low-resolution images with spectral bands lower or equal to 4, with a higher accuracy of about 93%. The RF completely dominated the other analysis cases, where the higher accuracy was about 94%. The classification accuracy is more reliable with high-resolution images than with the other resolution categories. However, the processing times of high-resolution images are much higher. Moreover, higher accuracy was often achieved with more expensive processing times. Besides, almost all machine learning algorithms suffered from the Hugs phenomenon during the analyses. So, before the classification with machine learning, some preprocessing is needed.","PeriodicalId":52195,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/ijain.v8i3.803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article aims to apply machine learning algorithms to the supervised classification of optical satellite images. Indeed, the latter is efficient in the study of land use. Despite the performance of machine learning in satellite image processing, this can change but depends on the nature of the satellite images used. Moreover, when we use the satellite, then the reliability of one classifier can be different from the others. In this paper, we examined the performance of DT, SVM, KNN, ANN, and RF. Analysis factors were used to investigate further their importance for Sentinel 2, Landsat 8, Terra Modis, and Spot 5 images. The results show that the KNN showed the most interesting accuracy during the analysis of medium and low-resolution images with spectral bands lower or equal to 4, with a higher accuracy of about 93%. The RF completely dominated the other analysis cases, where the higher accuracy was about 94%. The classification accuracy is more reliable with high-resolution images than with the other resolution categories. However, the processing times of high-resolution images are much higher. Moreover, higher accuracy was often achieved with more expensive processing times. Besides, almost all machine learning algorithms suffered from the Hugs phenomenon during the analyses. So, before the classification with machine learning, some preprocessing is needed.
基于机器学习算法的光学卫星图像土地覆盖分类
本文旨在将机器学习算法应用于光学卫星图像的监督分类。事实上,后者在研究土地使用方面是有效的。尽管机器学习在卫星图像处理中的表现,但这可以改变,但取决于所使用的卫星图像的性质。此外,当我们使用卫星时,一个分类器的可靠性可能与其他分类器不同。在本文中,我们检验了DT、SVM、KNN、ANN和RF的性能。分析因子用于进一步研究它们对Sentinel 2、Landsat 8、Terra Modis和Spot 5图像的重要性。结果表明,在光谱带小于或等于4的中低分辨率图像中,KNN的分析精度最高,达到93%左右。RF完全主导了其他分析案例,其中准确率较高,约为94%。高分辨率图像的分类精度比其他分辨率类别的分类精度更可靠。然而,高分辨率图像的处理时间要高得多。此外,更高的精度通常以更昂贵的处理时间来实现。此外,几乎所有的机器学习算法在分析过程中都存在Hugs现象。因此,在使用机器学习进行分类之前,需要进行一些预处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics
International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics Computer Science-Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信