Job Requirements, Resources and Proactive Behavior at Work: The Role of Work Engagement and Stress

Marija Miselytė, Dalia Bagdžiūnienė, Violeta Jakutė
{"title":"Job Requirements, Resources and Proactive Behavior at Work: The Role of Work Engagement and Stress","authors":"Marija Miselytė, Dalia Bagdžiūnienė, Violeta Jakutė","doi":"10.15388/PSICHOL.2019.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proactive employees are an important part of social capital in modern organizations that operate in a competitive and ever-changing business environment. Proactive behavior (PB) is defined as self-directed and future-oriented actions that are aimed to change the situation, work environment, or oneself (Bindl & Parker, 2010). Proactive workers initiate individual and organizational changes, and they not only respond to work requirements or adapt to environmental conditions (Fritz & Sonnentag, 2009). Therefore, it is important to analyze the work and personal characteristics that may be significant in order to enhance the employees’ PB. The paper presents an empirical study that integrates the theoretical approaches of Proactive Behavior (Parker & Collins, 2010) and Job Demands – Resources (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004). It is aimed, first, to examine the links between job demands (pace and amount of work, emotional and mental workload), resources (autonomy and feedback), and work engagement and stress with employee strategic proactive behaviors as well as work and person-environment fit proactive behaviors. Second, to determine the role that work engagement and stress have in the relationships between job characteristics and PB types. \nA total of 386 employees from various Lithuanian organizations were surveyed online. Sixty one percent of the respondents were female; the average age of the respondents was 34.8 (SD = 11.32) years, with an average of 7.3 (SD = 8.22) years of working experience in their organizations. Twenty one percent of the respondents were first-level managers. Most of the respondents (93.6%) had acquired higher education. \nStructural equation modeling analyses revealed that strategic PB, through engagement as a mediator, was predicted by autonomy, mental workload, and feedback; proactive work behavior was predicted by emotional workload, while mental workload, autonomy, and feedback were related to proactive work behavior through work engagement as a mediator; proactive person-environment fit behavior was predicted only by feedback via work engagement as a mediator. The study has shown that employee PB can be reinforced not only with job resources (autonomy and feedback) but job demands as well (the mental and emotional workload) via the mediative effect of work engagement. Work stress was not related with PB. The practical applications of research findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":33049,"journal":{"name":"Psichologija","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psichologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/PSICHOL.2019.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Proactive employees are an important part of social capital in modern organizations that operate in a competitive and ever-changing business environment. Proactive behavior (PB) is defined as self-directed and future-oriented actions that are aimed to change the situation, work environment, or oneself (Bindl & Parker, 2010). Proactive workers initiate individual and organizational changes, and they not only respond to work requirements or adapt to environmental conditions (Fritz & Sonnentag, 2009). Therefore, it is important to analyze the work and personal characteristics that may be significant in order to enhance the employees’ PB. The paper presents an empirical study that integrates the theoretical approaches of Proactive Behavior (Parker & Collins, 2010) and Job Demands – Resources (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004). It is aimed, first, to examine the links between job demands (pace and amount of work, emotional and mental workload), resources (autonomy and feedback), and work engagement and stress with employee strategic proactive behaviors as well as work and person-environment fit proactive behaviors. Second, to determine the role that work engagement and stress have in the relationships between job characteristics and PB types. A total of 386 employees from various Lithuanian organizations were surveyed online. Sixty one percent of the respondents were female; the average age of the respondents was 34.8 (SD = 11.32) years, with an average of 7.3 (SD = 8.22) years of working experience in their organizations. Twenty one percent of the respondents were first-level managers. Most of the respondents (93.6%) had acquired higher education. Structural equation modeling analyses revealed that strategic PB, through engagement as a mediator, was predicted by autonomy, mental workload, and feedback; proactive work behavior was predicted by emotional workload, while mental workload, autonomy, and feedback were related to proactive work behavior through work engagement as a mediator; proactive person-environment fit behavior was predicted only by feedback via work engagement as a mediator. The study has shown that employee PB can be reinforced not only with job resources (autonomy and feedback) but job demands as well (the mental and emotional workload) via the mediative effect of work engagement. Work stress was not related with PB. The practical applications of research findings are discussed.
工作要求、资源和工作中的主动行为:工作投入和压力的作用
在竞争激烈、瞬息万变的商业环境中,积极主动的员工是现代组织社会资本的重要组成部分。主动行为(PB)被定义为自我导向和面向未来的行动,旨在改变情况、工作环境或自己(Bindl & Parker, 2010)。积极主动的员工发起个人和组织的变革,他们不仅响应工作要求或适应环境条件(Fritz & Sonnentag, 2009)。因此,分析员工的工作特征和个人特征对于提升员工的PB具有重要意义。本文结合了主动行为(Parker & Collins, 2010)和工作需求-资源(Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004)的理论方法,进行了实证研究。首先,它的目的是检查工作需求(工作速度和工作量,情感和精神工作量),资源(自主性和反馈),工作投入和压力与员工战略主动行为以及工作和个人环境适应主动行为之间的联系。第二,确定工作投入和压力在工作特征与PB类型关系中的作用。共有来自立陶宛各组织的386名员工接受了在线调查。61%的受访者是女性;受访者的平均年龄为34.8岁(SD = 11.32),在所属机构的平均工作经验为7.3年(SD = 8.22)。21%的受访者是一级管理人员。大多数受访者(93.6%)接受过高等教育。结构方程模型分析表明,自主性、心理工作量和反馈对战略绩效的预测有中介作用;情绪负荷对主动性工作行为有预测作用,而心理负荷、自主性和反馈通过工作投入对主动性工作行为有中介作用;主动性人-环境契合行为仅通过工作投入作为中介的反馈来预测。研究表明,员工主观幸福感不仅可以通过工作资源(自主性和反馈)得到强化,还可以通过工作投入的中介作用,通过工作需求(心理和情绪负荷)得到强化。工作压力与PB无关。讨论了研究成果的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信