Meeting the challenges of biological threats and bioweapons in the 21st century

E. Ristanovic, Al-Daheri Buršaid
{"title":"Meeting the challenges of biological threats and bioweapons in the 21st century","authors":"E. Ristanovic, Al-Daheri Buršaid","doi":"10.5937/socpreg56-40572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biological warfare has attracted people since the earliest times. During the Cold War, bio-weapons were part of the arsenal of both world superpowers. The Convention prohibiting the production, storage, transfer and use of potential biological weapons (BWC) was signed 50 years ago. The question arises how sincere the signatory states were in its implementation. The rapid development of molecular biology has raised awareness about its potential misuse in terms of creating new and more dangerous bio-weapons, as well as the question of ethics in biomedical research. The anthrax campaign in the USA represents a turning point after which the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), including biological ones, has become part of the narrative that accompanies each war conflict. Epidemics and pandemics of avian and swine flu, Zika virus, SARS, MERS and COVID-19, as well as their implications, have proved the significance of a multidisciplinary approach to the study of microorganisms, their epidemiological, microbiological, genetic and antigenic characteristics, methods of their diagnosis, prevention and treatment, not only from the biomedical, but also from the security aspect. Perhaps the 50th anniversary is the right time to ask why the International Expert Body for controlling the implementation of the BTWC provisions has not been constituted yet.","PeriodicalId":32231,"journal":{"name":"Socioloski Pregled","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socioloski Pregled","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg56-40572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological warfare has attracted people since the earliest times. During the Cold War, bio-weapons were part of the arsenal of both world superpowers. The Convention prohibiting the production, storage, transfer and use of potential biological weapons (BWC) was signed 50 years ago. The question arises how sincere the signatory states were in its implementation. The rapid development of molecular biology has raised awareness about its potential misuse in terms of creating new and more dangerous bio-weapons, as well as the question of ethics in biomedical research. The anthrax campaign in the USA represents a turning point after which the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), including biological ones, has become part of the narrative that accompanies each war conflict. Epidemics and pandemics of avian and swine flu, Zika virus, SARS, MERS and COVID-19, as well as their implications, have proved the significance of a multidisciplinary approach to the study of microorganisms, their epidemiological, microbiological, genetic and antigenic characteristics, methods of their diagnosis, prevention and treatment, not only from the biomedical, but also from the security aspect. Perhaps the 50th anniversary is the right time to ask why the International Expert Body for controlling the implementation of the BTWC provisions has not been constituted yet.
应对21世纪生物威胁和生物武器的挑战
生物战自古以来就吸引着人们。冷战期间,生物武器是两个世界超级大国武器库的一部分。《禁止生产、储存、转让和使用潜在生物武器公约》签署于50年前。问题是,签署国在执行《公约》方面有多真诚。分子生物学的迅速发展提高了人们对其在制造新的和更危险的生物武器方面可能被滥用的认识,以及对生物医学研究中的伦理问题的认识。美国的炭疽运动代表了一个转折点,在此之后,包括生物武器在内的大规模杀伤性武器(WMD)的使用已成为伴随每一场战争冲突的叙述的一部分。禽流感和猪流感、寨卡病毒、SARS、中东呼吸综合征和COVID-19的流行和大流行及其影响,证明了多学科方法研究微生物,其流行病学、微生物学、遗传和抗原特征,其诊断、预防和治疗方法的重要性,不仅从生物医学方面,而且从安全方面。也许50周年是一个恰当的时机来问为什么控制《禁止生物武器公约》条款执行情况的国际专家机构尚未成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书