Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbantu Google Sites pada Pembelajaran Tematik Tema 4 Subtema 1 Kelas V SDN 11 Pontianak Kota

Muhamad Wahfiudin, Asmayani Salimi, Dyoty Auliya Vilda Ghasya, Siti Halidjah, Rio Pranata
{"title":"Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbantu Google Sites pada Pembelajaran Tematik Tema 4 Subtema 1 Kelas V SDN 11 Pontianak Kota","authors":"Muhamad Wahfiudin, Asmayani Salimi, Dyoty Auliya Vilda Ghasya, Siti Halidjah, Rio Pranata","doi":"10.36088/fondatia.v7i2.3438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making learning media supported by Google sites for Theme 4, Sub Theme 1, Learning 1 material is the purpose of this research. Borg and Gall's development research used nine of the ten development steps, including potential problems, data collection, design, design validation, design revision, initial trial, product revision, trial use, and product revision. Quantitative data was obtained from the results of validator product evaluations and teacher and student responses to the media practicability questionnaire. Validators, teachers, and students provided suggestions and notes that became the source of qualitative data. Interview guidelines, questionnaires, and documentation are examples of research tools. The results of the assessment by media and material experts are used to determine the feasibility level of a learning media, while the teacher and student assessments are used to determine the practicality level of a learning media. The average media expert validation score of 4.4 which meets the criteria of \"very valid\" puts the product in the \"very feasible\" category for use in the field. The material expert validation results get an average of 4.2 with the criteria \"very valid\" which means the product is included in the \"very feasible\" category for use in the field. The results of the evaluation of the practicality of learning media by small groups obtained an average of 3.31 with the criteria \"very practical\". The results of the evaluation of the practicality of learning media by large groups obtained an average of 3.39 with the criteria \"very practical\". The media obtained an average score of 3.78 with the criteria of \"very practical\" according to the teacher's assessment of its practicality.","PeriodicalId":34086,"journal":{"name":"Fondatia Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar","volume":"21 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fondatia Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v7i2.3438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Making learning media supported by Google sites for Theme 4, Sub Theme 1, Learning 1 material is the purpose of this research. Borg and Gall's development research used nine of the ten development steps, including potential problems, data collection, design, design validation, design revision, initial trial, product revision, trial use, and product revision. Quantitative data was obtained from the results of validator product evaluations and teacher and student responses to the media practicability questionnaire. Validators, teachers, and students provided suggestions and notes that became the source of qualitative data. Interview guidelines, questionnaires, and documentation are examples of research tools. The results of the assessment by media and material experts are used to determine the feasibility level of a learning media, while the teacher and student assessments are used to determine the practicality level of a learning media. The average media expert validation score of 4.4 which meets the criteria of "very valid" puts the product in the "very feasible" category for use in the field. The material expert validation results get an average of 4.2 with the criteria "very valid" which means the product is included in the "very feasible" category for use in the field. The results of the evaluation of the practicality of learning media by small groups obtained an average of 3.31 with the criteria "very practical". The results of the evaluation of the practicality of learning media by large groups obtained an average of 3.39 with the criteria "very practical". The media obtained an average score of 3.78 with the criteria of "very practical" according to the teacher's assessment of its practicality.
制作由Google网站支持的学习媒体为主题4,子主题1,学习1材料是本研究的目的。Borg和Gall的开发研究使用了10个开发步骤中的9个,包括潜在问题、数据收集、设计、设计验证、设计修订、初始试验、产品修订、试用和产品修订。定量数据来自验证器产品评估结果和教师和学生对媒体实用性问卷的回答。验证者、老师和学生提供的建议和笔记成为定性数据的来源。访谈指南、问卷调查和文件都是研究工具的例子。媒体和材料专家的评估结果用于确定学习媒体的可行性水平,而教师和学生的评估结果用于确定学习媒体的实用性水平。媒体专家的平均验证分数为4.4分,符合“非常有效”的标准,使该产品在该领域的使用处于“非常可行”的类别。材料专家验证结果平均为4.2分,标准为“非常有效”,这意味着该产品在该领域的使用属于“非常可行”的类别。小团体对学习媒体实用性的评价结果平均为3.31分,评价标准为“非常实用”。大群体对学习媒体实用性的评价结果平均为3.39分,评价标准为“非常实用”。根据老师对该媒体实用性的评价,该媒体的平均得分为3.78分,评分标准为“非常实用”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信