The Сontroversy against Josephites in the Life of Serapion, Archbishop of Novgorod

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Kazakov
{"title":"The Сontroversy against Josephites in the Life of Serapion, Archbishop of Novgorod","authors":"A. Kazakov","doi":"10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conflict between the Joseph-Volokolamsk monastery and the Novgorod see under Archbishop Serapion was touched upon in a considerable number of works devoted to the history of the Russian church at the turn of the 16th century. Regardless of whom the researchers were inclined to consider as the instigator of the feud, most of their studies were based on the sources of Josephite origin. The present paper is an attempt to look at the complex relationship of the Volokolamsk hegumen with the Novgorod archbishop as presented in the Life of St. Serapion. A preliminary analysis of the composition of the text shows its heterogeneity: the Life contains both passages with sharp attacks on Joseph Volotsky, and a generally quite correct account of his reconciliation with Serapion. Most of the article is devoted to the question of how Archbishop Serapion himself and his supporters were inclined to evaluate the actions of Joseph Volotsky, which were directed squarely against the Novgorod archbishop and ended with his forcible removal from the bishop’s see at the behest of the Grand Prince. Consideration of this issue essentially allows us to conclude that the system of self-justification of the Novgorod archbishop in the text of his Life was quite deliberate and consistent and was based primarily on his ideas about the bishop's prerogatives in relation to the Volokolamsk hegumen subordinate to his authority. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.5","PeriodicalId":42189,"journal":{"name":"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"135-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conflict between the Joseph-Volokolamsk monastery and the Novgorod see under Archbishop Serapion was touched upon in a considerable number of works devoted to the history of the Russian church at the turn of the 16th century. Regardless of whom the researchers were inclined to consider as the instigator of the feud, most of their studies were based on the sources of Josephite origin. The present paper is an attempt to look at the complex relationship of the Volokolamsk hegumen with the Novgorod archbishop as presented in the Life of St. Serapion. A preliminary analysis of the composition of the text shows its heterogeneity: the Life contains both passages with sharp attacks on Joseph Volotsky, and a generally quite correct account of his reconciliation with Serapion. Most of the article is devoted to the question of how Archbishop Serapion himself and his supporters were inclined to evaluate the actions of Joseph Volotsky, which were directed squarely against the Novgorod archbishop and ended with his forcible removal from the bishop’s see at the behest of the Grand Prince. Consideration of this issue essentially allows us to conclude that the system of self-justification of the Novgorod archbishop in the text of his Life was quite deliberate and consistent and was based primarily on his ideas about the bishop's prerogatives in relation to the Volokolamsk hegumen subordinate to his authority. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.5
在诺夫哥罗德大主教塞拉皮恩的一生中Сontroversy反对约瑟夫派
约瑟夫-沃洛科拉姆斯克修道院和大主教塞拉皮翁领导下的诺夫哥罗德教堂之间的冲突在16世纪初专门研究俄罗斯教会历史的大量作品中都有提及。不管研究人员倾向于认为谁是这场争斗的始作俑者,他们的大部分研究都是基于约瑟夫起源的资料。本论文是一个试图看看在圣塞拉皮翁的生活中提出的沃洛科拉姆斯克hegumen与诺夫哥罗德大主教的复杂关系。对文本构成的初步分析显示了它的异质性:《生活》既有对约瑟夫·沃洛茨基的尖锐攻击,也有对他与塞拉皮恩和解的大体正确的描述。这篇文章的大部分内容都是关于Serapion大主教和他的支持者如何评价Joseph Volotsky的行为,这些行为直接针对诺夫哥罗德大主教,并以他在大公的命令下被强行从主教宝座上撤职而告终。考虑到这个问题,我们基本上可以得出这样的结论:诺夫哥罗德大主教在他的《生平》中自我辩护的制度是经过深思熟虑和前后一致的,主要是基于他关于主教的特权的观点,即与隶属于他的权威的沃洛科拉姆斯克教区有关。2305 - 6754.2020.9.1.5 DOI: 10.31168 /
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies
Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Slověne = Словѣне is a periodical focusing on the fields of the arts and humanities. In accordance with the standards of humanities periodicals aimed at the development of national philological traditions in a broad cultural and academic context, the Journal Slověne = Словѣне is multilingual but with a focus on papers in English. The Journal Slověne = Словѣне is intended for the exchange of information between Russian scholars and leading universities and research centers throughout the world and for their further professional integration into the international academic community through a shared focus on Slavic studies. The target audience of the journal is Slavic philologists and scholars in related disciplines (historians, cultural anthropologists, sociologists, specialists in comparative and religious studies, etc.) and related fields (Byzantinists, Germanists, Hebraists, Turkologists, Finno-Ugrists, etc.). The periodical has a pronounced interdisciplinary character and publishes papers from the widest linguistic, philological, and historico-cultural range: there are studies of linguistic typology, pragmalinguistics, computer and applied linguistics, etymology, onomastics, epigraphy, ethnolinguistics, dialectology, folkloristics, Biblical studies, history of science, palaeoslavistics, history of Slavic literatures, Slavs in the context of foreign languages, non-Slavic languages and dialects in the Slavic context, and historical linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信