A Survey on Screening and Diagnostic Criteria of Auditory Processing Disorders in India.

IF 7.2 1区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Economic Geography Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s12070-023-04146-w

Sandeep Kumar, Chandni Jain

{"title":"A Survey on Screening and Diagnostic Criteria of Auditory Processing Disorders in India.","authors":"Sandeep Kumar, Chandni Jain","doi":"10.1007/s12070-023-04146-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study aimed to determine the criteria used for screening and diagnosing cases with central auditory processing disorders (CAPD) in India. A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey design was used in the present study. A questionnaire was developed to determine the criteria used for screening and diagnosing CAPD across clinics in India. Responses were obtained from 83 participants from all over India. Results indicated that 78% of respondents were currently doing CAPD evaluation. In that, the majority of respondents (63%) had a predetermined minimum battery that was relatively adaptable depending on the case history and age of the patient. In screening, most respondents used a screening questionnaire (SCAP, 75%) and a screening test (STAP, 60%). In the diagnostic protocol, the most used tests by the respondents were masking level difference (MLD), repetition of words (RW), gap detection test (GDT), pitch pattern test (PPT), speech perception in noise (SPIN), digit span test (DST), dichotic digit test (DDT), binaural fusion test (BFT), auditory brainstem response (ABR), dichotic CV test (DCVT), and duration pattern test (DPT). The current study's result will help professionals choose the minimum test battery for diagnosing CAPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48225,"journal":{"name":"Economic Geography","volume":"1 1","pages":"288-297"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10909056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-04146-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aimed to determine the criteria used for screening and diagnosing cases with central auditory processing disorders (CAPD) in India. A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey design was used in the present study. A questionnaire was developed to determine the criteria used for screening and diagnosing CAPD across clinics in India. Responses were obtained from 83 participants from all over India. Results indicated that 78% of respondents were currently doing CAPD evaluation. In that, the majority of respondents (63%) had a predetermined minimum battery that was relatively adaptable depending on the case history and age of the patient. In screening, most respondents used a screening questionnaire (SCAP, 75%) and a screening test (STAP, 60%). In the diagnostic protocol, the most used tests by the respondents were masking level difference (MLD), repetition of words (RW), gap detection test (GDT), pitch pattern test (PPT), speech perception in noise (SPIN), digit span test (DST), dichotic digit test (DDT), binaural fusion test (BFT), auditory brainstem response (ABR), dichotic CV test (DCVT), and duration pattern test (DPT). The current study's result will help professionals choose the minimum test battery for diagnosing CAPD.

查看原文本刊更多论文

印度听觉处理障碍筛查和诊断标准调查。

本研究旨在确定印度用于筛查和诊断中枢听觉处理障碍 (CAPD) 病例的标准。本研究采用横断面问卷调查设计。为确定印度各诊所筛查和诊断 CAPD 所使用的标准，我们编制了一份调查问卷。来自印度各地的 83 名参与者作了回答。结果显示，78% 的受访者目前正在进行 CAPD 评估。其中，大多数受访者（63%）有一个预先确定的最低电池，该电池可根据病史和患者年龄进行相对调整。在筛查方面，大多数受访者使用筛查问卷（SCAP，75%）和筛查测试（STAP，60%）。在诊断方案中，受访者使用最多的测试包括掩蔽水平差异（MLD）、单词重复（RW）、间隙检测测试（GDT）、音调模式测试（PPT）、噪声中的言语感知（SPIN）、数字跨度测试（DST）、二分数字测试（DDT）、双耳融合测试（BFT）、听觉脑干反应（ABR）、二分CV测试（DCVT）和持续模式测试（DPT）。本研究的结果将有助于专业人员选择诊断 CAPD 的最低测试组合。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Economic Geography Multiple-

CiteScore

9.70

自引率

2.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Economic Geography is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing original research that advances the field of economic geography. Their goal is to publish high-quality studies that are both theoretically robust and grounded in empirical evidence, contributing to our understanding of the geographic factors and consequences of economic processes. It welcome submissions on a wide range of topics that provide primary evidence for significant theoretical interventions, offering key insights into important economic, social, development, and environmental issues. To ensure the highest quality publications, all submissions undergo a rigorous peer-review process with at least three external referees and an editor. Economic Geography has been owned by Clark University since 1925 and plays a central role in supporting the global activities of the field, providing publications and other forms of scholarly support. The journal is published five times a year in January, March, June, August, and November.