Specific Features of Perception of Semantically Equivalent Stimuli in the Verbal and Visual Form

V. Kiroy, Yelena Vlasovna Aslanyan, D. Lazurenko, O. Bakhtin
{"title":"Specific Features of Perception of Semantically Equivalent Stimuli in the Verbal and Visual Form","authors":"V. Kiroy, Yelena Vlasovna Aslanyan, D. Lazurenko, O. Bakhtin","doi":"10.11648/j.aap.20180301.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Response time and evoked potentials were registered for visual images related to two categories fruit and tableware as well as their verbal representations. The stimuli were presented randomly. The subjects were to attribute them regardless of the form (a word or image) to one of the categories. 11 female and 10 male subjects (average age 21.9±2.9 years) participated in the tests. 6 components of the evoked potentials were singled out: Р1 (Р66), N1 (N124), Р2 (Р180), N2 (N248), Р3 (Р331) and N3 (N456). Analysis showed that both female and male subjects demonstrated reliably longer response time for words as compared to those for corresponding images. For words, evoked potentials were registered in more complex configurations and with a shorter latency period for the early components (P1, N1) and longer latency period for the late ones (P2, N2, P3, N3). The evoked potential amplitude in response to verbal stimuli was smaller than that for visual ones. Evoked potential components in response to target stimuli (both images and words) had, in general, shorter latency. The amplitude of N1, Р2 and N2 components was lower, while that of P3 and N3 was higher for target stimuli rather than a non-target. The obtained results allow us to assume that evaluation of the type of information (verbal or visual) can be performed on early stages of stimulus perception (up to 120-150 ms). Further analysis includes either more detailed description of spatial features of the visual stimuli in parietal and occipital lobes or estimation of the semantics of a word employing the frontal and temporal areas. Decision-making on formulating a response barely depends on the manner of information presentation (visual and verbal).","PeriodicalId":7392,"journal":{"name":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","volume":"4 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20180301.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Response time and evoked potentials were registered for visual images related to two categories fruit and tableware as well as their verbal representations. The stimuli were presented randomly. The subjects were to attribute them regardless of the form (a word or image) to one of the categories. 11 female and 10 male subjects (average age 21.9±2.9 years) participated in the tests. 6 components of the evoked potentials were singled out: Р1 (Р66), N1 (N124), Р2 (Р180), N2 (N248), Р3 (Р331) and N3 (N456). Analysis showed that both female and male subjects demonstrated reliably longer response time for words as compared to those for corresponding images. For words, evoked potentials were registered in more complex configurations and with a shorter latency period for the early components (P1, N1) and longer latency period for the late ones (P2, N2, P3, N3). The evoked potential amplitude in response to verbal stimuli was smaller than that for visual ones. Evoked potential components in response to target stimuli (both images and words) had, in general, shorter latency. The amplitude of N1, Р2 and N2 components was lower, while that of P3 and N3 was higher for target stimuli rather than a non-target. The obtained results allow us to assume that evaluation of the type of information (verbal or visual) can be performed on early stages of stimulus perception (up to 120-150 ms). Further analysis includes either more detailed description of spatial features of the visual stimuli in parietal and occipital lobes or estimation of the semantics of a word employing the frontal and temporal areas. Decision-making on formulating a response barely depends on the manner of information presentation (visual and verbal).
语言和视觉形式语义等效刺激感知的特征
对水果和餐具两类视觉图像及其口头表征进行反应时间和诱发电位记录。刺激是随机呈现的。受试者被要求将它们归为其中一个类别,而不考虑其形式(一个单词或图像)。女性11名,男性10名,平均年龄21.9±2.9岁。6个诱发电位成分分别为Р1 (Р66)、N1 (N124)、Р2 (Р180)、N2 (N248)、Р3 (Р331)和N3 (N456)。分析表明,女性和男性受试者对单词的反应时间都比对相应图像的反应时间长。单词的诱发电位配置更为复杂,且早期成分(P1、N1)潜伏期较短,晚期成分(P2、N2、P3、N3)潜伏期较长。言语刺激诱发电位幅值小于视觉刺激。一般来说,对目标刺激(图像和文字)的诱发电位反应具有较短的潜伏期。靶刺激下N1、Р2和N2分量的振幅较低,P3和N3分量的振幅高于非靶刺激。获得的结果允许我们假设对信息类型(口头或视觉)的评估可以在刺激感知的早期阶段进行(高达120-150毫秒)。进一步的分析包括在顶叶和枕叶中对视觉刺激的空间特征进行更详细的描述,或者利用额叶和颞叶对单词的语义进行估计。制定回应的决策几乎不取决于信息呈现的方式(视觉和口头)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信