Composition and Quality of Concentrated Yoghurt (Labneh) Supplemented with Date Fruits

W. Elkot, N. Mehanna, Ahmed Aser
{"title":"Composition and Quality of Concentrated Yoghurt (Labneh) Supplemented with Date Fruits","authors":"W. Elkot, N. Mehanna, Ahmed Aser","doi":"10.21608/ejfs.2021.69084.1102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Date fruits of two different cultivars were prepared in dried form and added to labneh in two levels of 5 % and 10 % (w/w) from varieties of Malkabi (M) and Gondaila (G) to give treatments of M5, M10, G5 and G10 respectively, whereas the control (C) was prepared without adding date powder (DP). Analysis of the fresh labneh revealed an increase (P≤0.05) in its contents of total solids, ash and carbohydrate and decrease in fat, FDM and protein contents due to the use of DP. The recorded changes were proportional with the amount of DP added. The control had the highest acidity (1.47%) and the lowest pH values (4.35), while the applied treatments had a significant impact on decreasing acidity, but the differences in pH were insignificant. The used dates significantly increased Ca, P and Mg contents, whereas the highest corresponding values were 102.56, 137.20 and 21.88 mg/100g labneh treated with Gondaila variety at level of 10% DP. The calculated caloric values expressed as KJ/Kg were 738.08, 764.75, 794.55, 758.97 and 778.03 for the control and labneh from M5, M10, G5 and G10 respectively. Organoleptically, the control had the highest scores for appearance, whereas the DP- treated samples ranked the highest scores for flavour. No significant differences were recorded for scores given for consistency of all treated and untreated samples.","PeriodicalId":11425,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Food Science","volume":"37 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejfs.2021.69084.1102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Date fruits of two different cultivars were prepared in dried form and added to labneh in two levels of 5 % and 10 % (w/w) from varieties of Malkabi (M) and Gondaila (G) to give treatments of M5, M10, G5 and G10 respectively, whereas the control (C) was prepared without adding date powder (DP). Analysis of the fresh labneh revealed an increase (P≤0.05) in its contents of total solids, ash and carbohydrate and decrease in fat, FDM and protein contents due to the use of DP. The recorded changes were proportional with the amount of DP added. The control had the highest acidity (1.47%) and the lowest pH values (4.35), while the applied treatments had a significant impact on decreasing acidity, but the differences in pH were insignificant. The used dates significantly increased Ca, P and Mg contents, whereas the highest corresponding values were 102.56, 137.20 and 21.88 mg/100g labneh treated with Gondaila variety at level of 10% DP. The calculated caloric values expressed as KJ/Kg were 738.08, 764.75, 794.55, 758.97 and 778.03 for the control and labneh from M5, M10, G5 and G10 respectively. Organoleptically, the control had the highest scores for appearance, whereas the DP- treated samples ranked the highest scores for flavour. No significant differences were recorded for scores given for consistency of all treated and untreated samples.
添加枣果的浓缩酸奶(Labneh)的成分和质量
以麦卡比(M)和贡代拉(G)品种为原料,制备2个不同品种的枣子,分别以5%和10% (w/w)的浓度添加labneh,分别给予M5、M10、G5和G10处理,而对照(C)不添加枣粉(DP)。结果表明,DP的使用提高了鲜奶的总固形物、灰分和碳水化合物含量(P≤0.05),降低了脂肪、脂肪干物质和蛋白质含量。记录的变化与DP的添加量成正比。对照的酸度最高(1.47%),pH最低(4.35),施用处理对降低酸度有显著影响,但pH差异不显著。在10% DP水平下,贡代拉品种处理的Ca、P和Mg含量最高,分别为102.56、137.20和21.88 Mg /100g labneh。M5、M10、G5和G10的对照和labneh的计算热值分别为738.08、764.75、794.55、758.97和778.03。在感官上,对照组在外观上得分最高,而经DP处理的样品在味道上得分最高。所有处理过的和未处理过的样品的一致性评分没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信