THE LIKELIHOOD OF ACETONE INTERFERENCE IN BREATH ALCOHOL MEASUREMENT

J. Frank, A. Flores
{"title":"THE LIKELIHOOD OF ACETONE INTERFERENCE IN BREATH ALCOHOL MEASUREMENT","authors":"J. Frank, A. Flores","doi":"10.1037/e485852008-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report discusses the significnce of possible interference of acetone in breath alcohol testing. The following dimensions are considered: (1) what levels of acetone concentration may appear on the breath, (2) what levels of acetone concentration may produce significant breath alcohol concentration readings by breath testers, and (3) which instrument types may be sensitive to the presence of acetone. The issue of acetone interference was found to have no practical significance in traffic law enforcement for the following reasons: (1) The level of actone on the breath that would be required to produce even minimal breath alcohol concentration readings (e.g. 0.01%) is rarely seen in the on-the-road arrest situations (i.e. less than 0.028% of the situations). (2) Diabetic and dieting individuals who are well enough to drive do not have sufficient levels of acetone on their breath to increase breath alcohol concentration readings more than a very small amount (practical maximum of 0.01% to 0.02%). (3) The number of evidential breath testers in use that are unable to discriminate between acetone and ethyl alcohol is very small, estimated to be less than 1,000 nationwide. Most commercially available evidential breath testers sold today are made to distinguish acetone from ethyl alcohol, so that the issue is moot in almost all cases.","PeriodicalId":80408,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol, drugs, and driving : abstracts and reviews","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol, drugs, and driving : abstracts and reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e485852008-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This report discusses the significnce of possible interference of acetone in breath alcohol testing. The following dimensions are considered: (1) what levels of acetone concentration may appear on the breath, (2) what levels of acetone concentration may produce significant breath alcohol concentration readings by breath testers, and (3) which instrument types may be sensitive to the presence of acetone. The issue of acetone interference was found to have no practical significance in traffic law enforcement for the following reasons: (1) The level of actone on the breath that would be required to produce even minimal breath alcohol concentration readings (e.g. 0.01%) is rarely seen in the on-the-road arrest situations (i.e. less than 0.028% of the situations). (2) Diabetic and dieting individuals who are well enough to drive do not have sufficient levels of acetone on their breath to increase breath alcohol concentration readings more than a very small amount (practical maximum of 0.01% to 0.02%). (3) The number of evidential breath testers in use that are unable to discriminate between acetone and ethyl alcohol is very small, estimated to be less than 1,000 nationwide. Most commercially available evidential breath testers sold today are made to distinguish acetone from ethyl alcohol, so that the issue is moot in almost all cases.
丙酮干扰呼气酒精测量的可能性
本文讨论了丙酮在呼气酒精测试中可能干扰的意义。考虑以下方面:(1)呼气中可能出现什么水平的丙酮浓度,(2)呼气测试器在什么水平的丙酮浓度下可能产生显著的呼气酒精浓度读数,以及(3)哪些仪器类型可能对丙酮的存在敏感。丙酮干扰的问题被发现在交通执法中没有实际意义,原因如下:(1)在路上逮捕的情况下(即少于0.028%的情况),呼气中丙酮的水平很少会产生最小的呼气酒精浓度读数(例如0.01%)。(2)能够开车的糖尿病患者和正在节食的人,其呼气中的丙酮含量不足以增加呼气中的酒精浓度读数(实际最大值为0.01%至0.02%)。(3)在使用的不能区分丙酮和乙醇的证据呼吸测试仪数量很少,估计全国不到1000台。目前市面上出售的大多数证据呼吸测试器都是用来区分丙酮和乙醇的,所以这个问题在几乎所有情况下都没有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信