S. Thakur, Suresh S Choudhary, Mukesh Kumar, R. Hiremath, K. Jaidev, Rohini VK, Monika Sharma, Sisir Raut, Hardewa Ram
{"title":"Primary total knee replacement without drain: A good and safe practice to inculcate","authors":"S. Thakur, Suresh S Choudhary, Mukesh Kumar, R. Hiremath, K. Jaidev, Rohini VK, Monika Sharma, Sisir Raut, Hardewa Ram","doi":"10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_383_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The use of drain in primary total knee replacement (TKR) started with the belief that it prevents hematoma formation and infection. The fear of infection made this practice an essential step that enjoyed a long journey. However, in recent years, majority of evidence-based studies have not only been failed to provide substantial benefits of the drain but also have proven this a counterproductive step. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to assess the outcome of performing primary TKR without the use of a drain. METHODOLOGY: After meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, a prospective observational study was conducted on 186 patients (191 knees) who underwent primary cemented total knee arthroplasty without the use of drain from September 2018 to March 2020 and were followed up for one year. Surgery was performed under tourniquet, bleeders were electro cauterized, and injection tranexamic acid was used to control bleeding. A good preoperative screening for foci of infection, tight glycemic control for diabetics, part preparation, prophylactic antibiotics, and gentle handling of soft tissue was ensured to control infection. Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis was instituted after risk stratification. Ambulation and physiotherapy were started as per protocol. The clinical parameters such as pain score and range of motion (ROM) were measured by a physiotherapist. Postoperative hemoglobin (Post Op Hb) and requirement of dressing change/reinforcement were monitored by the ward nurse. Aspiration of the knee if required was done by the treating surgeon. RESULTS: Post Op Hb drop was insignificant and none of the patients required blood transfusion. Tense arthrocoele, requiring rescue analgesia, were found in 5(2.6%) patients which responded well with knee aspiration. There was significant improvement (P < 00001) in pain score and the targeted ROM were achieved in 3 weeks' postoperative. Although ecchymosis was a common finding (20.4%), it did not require special attention. Blisters developed in six patients which were managed by antibiotic-impregnated paraffin dressing. Wound healing was not delayed in any patient. None of the patients acquired infection. CONCLUSION: Performing primary TKR without drain is a safe practice to exercise as it neither increases the risk of infection nor poses a significant threat of blood loss and blood transfusion. The presence of arthrocoele in postoperative period does not compromise short term clinical and functional outcomes. The incidence of developing tense hemarthrosis is very less and if aspirated, relieves patient's discomfort and aborts the surgeon's fear of infection. Moreover, not only the cost of drain and utilization of workforce is saved but the question of caring for the drain and its complications also ends.","PeriodicalId":13457,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_383_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of drain in primary total knee replacement (TKR) started with the belief that it prevents hematoma formation and infection. The fear of infection made this practice an essential step that enjoyed a long journey. However, in recent years, majority of evidence-based studies have not only been failed to provide substantial benefits of the drain but also have proven this a counterproductive step. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to assess the outcome of performing primary TKR without the use of a drain. METHODOLOGY: After meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, a prospective observational study was conducted on 186 patients (191 knees) who underwent primary cemented total knee arthroplasty without the use of drain from September 2018 to March 2020 and were followed up for one year. Surgery was performed under tourniquet, bleeders were electro cauterized, and injection tranexamic acid was used to control bleeding. A good preoperative screening for foci of infection, tight glycemic control for diabetics, part preparation, prophylactic antibiotics, and gentle handling of soft tissue was ensured to control infection. Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis was instituted after risk stratification. Ambulation and physiotherapy were started as per protocol. The clinical parameters such as pain score and range of motion (ROM) were measured by a physiotherapist. Postoperative hemoglobin (Post Op Hb) and requirement of dressing change/reinforcement were monitored by the ward nurse. Aspiration of the knee if required was done by the treating surgeon. RESULTS: Post Op Hb drop was insignificant and none of the patients required blood transfusion. Tense arthrocoele, requiring rescue analgesia, were found in 5(2.6%) patients which responded well with knee aspiration. There was significant improvement (P < 00001) in pain score and the targeted ROM were achieved in 3 weeks' postoperative. Although ecchymosis was a common finding (20.4%), it did not require special attention. Blisters developed in six patients which were managed by antibiotic-impregnated paraffin dressing. Wound healing was not delayed in any patient. None of the patients acquired infection. CONCLUSION: Performing primary TKR without drain is a safe practice to exercise as it neither increases the risk of infection nor poses a significant threat of blood loss and blood transfusion. The presence of arthrocoele in postoperative period does not compromise short term clinical and functional outcomes. The incidence of developing tense hemarthrosis is very less and if aspirated, relieves patient's discomfort and aborts the surgeon's fear of infection. Moreover, not only the cost of drain and utilization of workforce is saved but the question of caring for the drain and its complications also ends.
背景:在原发性全膝关节置换术(TKR)中使用引流管是为了防止血肿的形成和感染。对感染的恐惧使这一做法成为必不可少的步骤,并享受了漫长的旅程。然而,近年来,大多数基于证据的研究不仅未能提供流失的实质性好处,而且证明这是适得其反的步骤。目的:我们研究的目的是评估在不使用引流管的情况下进行初级TKR的结果。方法:在符合纳入和排除标准后,对186例(191个膝关节)于2018年9月至2020年3月行一期未使用引流管的骨水泥全膝关节置换术进行前瞻性观察研究,随访1年。手术在止血带下进行,出血点电灼,注射氨甲环酸止血。术前做好感染灶筛查,糖尿病患者严格控制血糖,局部准备,预防性使用抗生素,轻柔处理软组织,确保了感染的控制。在危险分层后进行深静脉血栓预防。根据协议开始走动和物理治疗。临床参数如疼痛评分和活动范围(ROM)由物理治疗师测量。术后血红蛋白(Post Op Hb)和换药/加固要求由病房护士监测。如果需要,则由治疗外科医生进行膝关节抽吸。结果:术后Hb下降不显著,无患者需要输血。5例(2.6%)患者对膝关节抽吸反应良好,需要紧急镇痛。术后3周疼痛评分和目标ROM均达到显著改善(P < 00001)。虽然瘀斑是常见的发现(20.4%),但不需要特别注意。6例患者出现水疱,采用抗生素浸渍石蜡敷料。无一例患者伤口愈合延迟。所有患者均无感染。结论:在没有引流的情况下进行原发性TKR是一种安全的锻炼方法,因为它既不会增加感染的风险,也不会造成失血和输血的重大威胁。术后出现关节内腔并不影响短期的临床和功能结果。发生紧张性关节血肿的发生率非常低,如果抽吸,可以减轻患者的不适,并消除外科医生对感染的恐惧。此外,不仅节省了劳动力的流失和利用成本,而且还解决了对流失及其并发症的照顾问题。