Verification Process for Finite Element Modeling Techniques Used in Biological Hard Tissue

Molly Townsend, Matthew Mills, N. Sarigul-Klijn
{"title":"Verification Process for Finite Element Modeling Techniques Used in Biological Hard Tissue","authors":"Molly Townsend, Matthew Mills, N. Sarigul-Klijn","doi":"10.1115/1.4063302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An approach is presented for calculation verification of geometry-based and voxel-based finite element modeling techniques used for biological hard tissue. The purpose of this study is to offer a controlled comparison of geometry- and voxel-based finite element modeling in terms of the convergence (i.e., discretization based on mesh size and/or element order), accuracy, and computational speed in modeling biological hard tissues. All of the geometry-based numerical test models have hp-converged at an acceptable mesh seed length of 0.6mm, while not all voxel-based models exhibited convergence and no voxel models p-converged. Converged geometry-based meshes were found to offer accurate solutions of the deformed model shape and equivalent vertebral stiffness, while voxel-based models were 6.35%±0.84% less stiff (p<0.0001) and deformed 6.79%±0.96% more (p<0.0001). Based on the controlled verification study results, the voxel-based models must be confirmed with local values and validation of quantities of interest to ensure accurate finite element model predictions.","PeriodicalId":73734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An approach is presented for calculation verification of geometry-based and voxel-based finite element modeling techniques used for biological hard tissue. The purpose of this study is to offer a controlled comparison of geometry- and voxel-based finite element modeling in terms of the convergence (i.e., discretization based on mesh size and/or element order), accuracy, and computational speed in modeling biological hard tissues. All of the geometry-based numerical test models have hp-converged at an acceptable mesh seed length of 0.6mm, while not all voxel-based models exhibited convergence and no voxel models p-converged. Converged geometry-based meshes were found to offer accurate solutions of the deformed model shape and equivalent vertebral stiffness, while voxel-based models were 6.35%±0.84% less stiff (p<0.0001) and deformed 6.79%±0.96% more (p<0.0001). Based on the controlled verification study results, the voxel-based models must be confirmed with local values and validation of quantities of interest to ensure accurate finite element model predictions.
生物硬组织有限元建模技术的验证过程
提出了一种用于生物硬组织的基于几何和基于体素的有限元建模技术的计算验证方法。本研究的目的是在生物硬组织建模的收敛性(即基于网格大小和/或单元顺序的离散化)、准确性和计算速度方面,对基于几何和基于体素的有限元建模进行控制比较。所有基于几何的数值测试模型都在可接受的0.6mm网格种子长度处具有hp收敛性,而并非所有基于体素的模型都具有收敛性,并且没有体素模型具有p收敛性。基于收敛几何的网格可以准确地解出变形模型的形状和等效椎体刚度,而基于体素的模型刚度降低了6.35%±0.84% (p<0.0001),变形增加了6.79%±0.96% (p<0.0001)。基于控制验证研究结果,必须对基于体素的模型进行局部值和感兴趣量的验证,以确保准确的有限元模型预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信