Review essay: Democracy and Prosperity

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
M. Höpner
{"title":"Review essay: Democracy and Prosperity","authors":"M. Höpner","doi":"10.1177/10242589211035042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Democracy and Prosperity is an exceptionally provocative and thereby stimulating book, especially for progressive readers. Torben Iversen and David Soskice argue that capitalism and democracy are mutually reinforcing. Democratic capitalism has worked well and will most likely work well in the future. Globalisation is not putting into question the primacy of politics over economic matters, nor will populism challenge the symbiosis of democratic politics and free markets.","PeriodicalId":23253,"journal":{"name":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589211035042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Democracy and Prosperity is an exceptionally provocative and thereby stimulating book, especially for progressive readers. Torben Iversen and David Soskice argue that capitalism and democracy are mutually reinforcing. Democratic capitalism has worked well and will most likely work well in the future. Globalisation is not putting into question the primacy of politics over economic matters, nor will populism challenge the symbiosis of democratic politics and free markets.
回顾文章:民主与繁荣
《民主与繁荣》是一本极具挑衅性的书,尤其对进步的读者来说,它具有刺激性。托本·艾弗森(Torben Iversen)和大卫·索斯基斯(David Soskice)认为,资本主义和民主是相互促进的。民主资本主义运行良好,未来也很可能运行良好。全球化不会质疑政治对经济事务的首要地位,民粹主义也不会挑战民主政治与自由市场的共生关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信