Effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a randomised, controlled study.

Boon Han Kevin Ng, Boon Han Kevin Ng, Boon Han Kevin Ng, I. Tang, I. Tang, Prepageran Narayanan, Rajagopalan Raman, Ricardo L. Carrau
{"title":"Effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a randomised, controlled study.","authors":"Boon Han Kevin Ng, Boon Han Kevin Ng, Boon Han Kevin Ng, I. Tang, I. Tang, Prepageran Narayanan, Rajagopalan Raman, Ricardo L. Carrau","doi":"10.1017/s0022215119002329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nNasal lavage with mupirocin has the potential to reduce sinonasal morbidity in endoscopic endonasal approaches for skull base surgery.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate the effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA pilot randomised, controlled trial was conducted on 20 adult patients who had undergone endoscopic endonasal approaches for skull base lesions. These patients were randomly assigned to cohorts using nasal lavages with mupirocin or without mupirocin. Patients were assessed in the out-patient clinic, one week and one month after surgery, using the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test questionnaire and nasal endoscopy.\n\n\nRESULTS\nPatients in the mupirocin nasal lavage group had lower nasal endoscopy scores post-operatively, and a statistically significant larger difference in nasal endoscopy scores at one month compared to one week. The mupirocin nasal lavage group also showed better Sino-Nasal Outcome Test scores at one month compared to the group without mupirocin.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nNasal lavage with mupirocin seems to yield better outcomes regarding patients' symptoms and endoscopic findings.","PeriodicalId":76651,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement","volume":"39 4 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215119002329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND Nasal lavage with mupirocin has the potential to reduce sinonasal morbidity in endoscopic endonasal approaches for skull base surgery. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. METHODS A pilot randomised, controlled trial was conducted on 20 adult patients who had undergone endoscopic endonasal approaches for skull base lesions. These patients were randomly assigned to cohorts using nasal lavages with mupirocin or without mupirocin. Patients were assessed in the out-patient clinic, one week and one month after surgery, using the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test questionnaire and nasal endoscopy. RESULTS Patients in the mupirocin nasal lavage group had lower nasal endoscopy scores post-operatively, and a statistically significant larger difference in nasal endoscopy scores at one month compared to one week. The mupirocin nasal lavage group also showed better Sino-Nasal Outcome Test scores at one month compared to the group without mupirocin. CONCLUSION Nasal lavage with mupirocin seems to yield better outcomes regarding patients' symptoms and endoscopic findings.
内镜鼻内颅底手术后加或不加莫匹罗星鼻腔灌洗的效果:一项随机对照研究。
背景:在颅底手术的鼻内镜入路中,莫匹罗星鼻腔灌洗有可能降低鼻窦的发病率。目的评价内镜下鼻内颅底手术后加用和不加用莫匹罗星灌鼻的效果。方法对20例经鼻内窥镜入路治疗颅底病变的成年患者进行随机对照试验。这些患者被随机分配到使用莫匹罗星或不使用莫匹罗星鼻腔冲洗的队列中。在门诊、术后1周和1个月对患者进行评估,采用22项Sino-Nasal Outcome Test问卷和鼻内镜检查。结果莫匹罗星鼻灌洗组患者术后鼻内镜评分较低,且术后1个月鼻内镜评分较术后1周差异有统计学意义。与不使用莫匹罗星的组相比,使用莫匹罗星鼻腔灌洗组在一个月时也显示出更好的中鼻预后测试分数。结论莫匹罗星鼻灌洗对患者的症状和内镜检查结果均有较好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信