Optimizing Basement Construction Methods

Nguyen Huu Bao
{"title":"Optimizing Basement Construction Methods","authors":"Nguyen Huu Bao","doi":"10.53893/ijrvocas.v1i3.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The underground part of SSG TOWER includes 4 basements, 4 basements at a height of -13.2m. Combined with the construction of 3m deep foundation, therefore, the minimum excavation depth is required to -16.2m. Due to the construction work in residential area, relatively ground, with large excavation depth and geology of the interaction area (clay layer up to 30m), the options for using diaphragm wall with drilled piles Small area, Laser piles or solier piles to make retaining walls during construction do not have that feature, so the author chooses the option of using reinforced concrete barrette walls for retaining walls during construction and as tunnel walls for this project.\nThe semi-topdown construction method was chosen to ensure safety during construction because the excavation depth of the work is quite large and the geology of this area is quite weak. This measure completely solves the strut system because using the floor structure of the building to support this system has high stability. Limiting the influence of settlement, cracking, and slippage to neighboring works a lot. Fast construction but in return for high technical requirements, high construction costs. Choose diaphragm wall thickness of 1.0m, base depth of 46.6m including standard barrete panels.\n The author uses 2D Plaxis simulation to calculate ground stability, stress and displacement, moment, and shear force generated in diaphragm wall during basement construction. The author analyzes using the optimization algorithm to compare and find the suitable solution.","PeriodicalId":14205,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Vocational Studies (IJRVOCAS)","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Vocational Studies (IJRVOCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53893/ijrvocas.v1i3.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The underground part of SSG TOWER includes 4 basements, 4 basements at a height of -13.2m. Combined with the construction of 3m deep foundation, therefore, the minimum excavation depth is required to -16.2m. Due to the construction work in residential area, relatively ground, with large excavation depth and geology of the interaction area (clay layer up to 30m), the options for using diaphragm wall with drilled piles Small area, Laser piles or solier piles to make retaining walls during construction do not have that feature, so the author chooses the option of using reinforced concrete barrette walls for retaining walls during construction and as tunnel walls for this project. The semi-topdown construction method was chosen to ensure safety during construction because the excavation depth of the work is quite large and the geology of this area is quite weak. This measure completely solves the strut system because using the floor structure of the building to support this system has high stability. Limiting the influence of settlement, cracking, and slippage to neighboring works a lot. Fast construction but in return for high technical requirements, high construction costs. Choose diaphragm wall thickness of 1.0m, base depth of 46.6m including standard barrete panels.  The author uses 2D Plaxis simulation to calculate ground stability, stress and displacement, moment, and shear force generated in diaphragm wall during basement construction. The author analyzes using the optimization algorithm to compare and find the suitable solution.
优化地下室施工方法
SSG塔地下部分包括4个地下室,4个地下室高度为-13.2m。因此,结合3m深基础的施工,要求最小开挖深度为-16.2m。由于施工区域为住宅小区,相对地面,开挖深度大,相互作用区域的地质条件(粘土层可达30m),施工中采用钻孔桩连续墙、激光桩或单孔桩制作挡土墙的方案不具备该特点,因此笔者在施工中选择钢筋混凝土挡土墙作为挡土墙,作为本工程的隧道墙。由于该工程开挖深度较大,且该地区地质条件较弱,为保证施工安全,选择了半顶向下施工方法。该措施完全解决了支撑体系的问题,因为利用建筑物的楼板结构来支撑支撑体系具有很高的稳定性。大大限制了沉降、开裂、滑移对周边工程的影响。施工速度快但换来的是技术要求高,施工成本高。选用连续墙厚度1.0m,底深46.6m,含标准发夹板。利用二维Plaxis模拟计算地下连续墙在地下施工过程中产生的地面稳定性、应力位移、弯矩和剪力。作者利用优化算法进行分析比较,找到合适的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信