A Comprehensive Comparison Study of Planar Circular and Square Couplers for IPT Applications

IF 0.2 Q4 AREA STUDIES
Jing Xiao, Xiaorui Wu, Wenlan Gong, Xiufang Liu, Shaonan Chen, Yousu Yao
{"title":"A Comprehensive Comparison Study of Planar Circular and Square Couplers for IPT Applications","authors":"Jing Xiao, Xiaorui Wu, Wenlan Gong, Xiufang Liu, Shaonan Chen, Yousu Yao","doi":"10.1109/ITECAsia-Pacific56316.2022.9941959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planar circular and square couplers (PCC and PSC) are two magnetic couplers that are most frequently employed in inductive power transfer (IPT) systems. However, PCC and PSC are not comprehensively compared. As a result, which coupler should be employed in a specific application is unclear. This paper compares PCC and PSC in terms of coupling coefficient, self-inductance factor, misalignment tolerance, coupler quality factor, cost, weight, and size. To make the comparison fair, PCC and PSC are firstly optimized. Two control IPT systems, one employing PCC while the other utilizing PSC, are built in PSIM. The advantages and disadvantages of PCC and PSC are further verified. PCC outperforms PSC in cost, weight, size, and coupler quality factor, but PSC performs better in coupling coefficient, self-inductance factor, and misalignment tolerance. Hence, PSC is preferable in most applications except rotating case.","PeriodicalId":45126,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal-Japan Focus","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal-Japan Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITECAsia-Pacific56316.2022.9941959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Planar circular and square couplers (PCC and PSC) are two magnetic couplers that are most frequently employed in inductive power transfer (IPT) systems. However, PCC and PSC are not comprehensively compared. As a result, which coupler should be employed in a specific application is unclear. This paper compares PCC and PSC in terms of coupling coefficient, self-inductance factor, misalignment tolerance, coupler quality factor, cost, weight, and size. To make the comparison fair, PCC and PSC are firstly optimized. Two control IPT systems, one employing PCC while the other utilizing PSC, are built in PSIM. The advantages and disadvantages of PCC and PSC are further verified. PCC outperforms PSC in cost, weight, size, and coupler quality factor, but PSC performs better in coupling coefficient, self-inductance factor, and misalignment tolerance. Hence, PSC is preferable in most applications except rotating case.
用于IPT应用的平面圆形和方形耦合器的综合比较研究
平面圆形和方形耦合器(PCC和PSC)是感应功率传输(IPT)系统中最常用的两种磁性耦合器。然而,PCC和PSC并没有进行全面的比较。因此,在特定应用中应该采用哪种耦合器是不清楚的。本文从耦合系数、自感系数、不对中公差、耦合器质量系数、成本、重量和尺寸等方面对PCC和PSC进行了比较。为了使比较公平,首先对PCC和PSC进行了优化。两个控制IPT系统,一个使用PCC,另一个使用PSC,在PSIM中构建。进一步验证了PCC和PSC的优缺点。PCC在成本、重量、尺寸和耦合器质量系数方面优于PSC,但PSC在耦合系数、自感系数和不对中公差方面优于PSC。因此,除旋转外壳外,PSC在大多数应用中是优选的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信