Pipe Dreams of the Nouveaux Riches

Q2 Social Sciences
Culture Unbound Pub Date : 2021-07-27 DOI:10.3384/cu.3376
Kristian Bjørkdahl
{"title":"Pipe Dreams of the Nouveaux Riches","authors":"Kristian Bjørkdahl","doi":"10.3384/cu.3376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"World expos are occasions for the type of rhetorical display known as \"epideictic,\" and as such, they provide glimpses into how a nation wants to be seen at a particular point in time. In this article, I probe into Norway’s pavilion at the 1992 expo in Seville, Spain, for answers to what Norway wanted to be in the early 1990s. I will argue that Norway’s pavilion, a “deconstructed structure” that centered on a somewhat ambiguous pipe, signals a country in the process of reinventing itself under the aegis of petroleum. More specifically, I suggest that Norway’s ’92 pavilion can be read as an early instantiation of rhetorical techniques that would later become key to Norway’s claim to being both a leading petroleum producer and an environmental frontrunner. The pavilion itself pulled off this balancing act in much the same way that politicians and others would later learn to handle it – by techniques of rhetorical association and dissociation (Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca 1969 [1958]). Having chosen “the cycle of water” as the overarching theme for the exhibition, the makers of the pavilion (the largest sponsor of which was the state oil company, Statoil) managed to make petroleum safe by renaming it “offshore” and by associating it, also in many other ways, with water. The pavilion’s deconstructive architecture can thus be understood as an early validation of the rhetorical practice of “putting together” and “taking apart” to make new things that serve the nation’s interests – in this case a “cycle of water” in which petroleum was a natural part. Although I posit only similarity, and not causality, the rhetorical techniques of Norway’s ’92 pavilion were in this way strikingly similar to what later became a stock argument, e.g. that Norway offers “the world’s cleanest petroleum” (see Ihlen 2007).","PeriodicalId":52133,"journal":{"name":"Culture Unbound","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Unbound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.3376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

World expos are occasions for the type of rhetorical display known as "epideictic," and as such, they provide glimpses into how a nation wants to be seen at a particular point in time. In this article, I probe into Norway’s pavilion at the 1992 expo in Seville, Spain, for answers to what Norway wanted to be in the early 1990s. I will argue that Norway’s pavilion, a “deconstructed structure” that centered on a somewhat ambiguous pipe, signals a country in the process of reinventing itself under the aegis of petroleum. More specifically, I suggest that Norway’s ’92 pavilion can be read as an early instantiation of rhetorical techniques that would later become key to Norway’s claim to being both a leading petroleum producer and an environmental frontrunner. The pavilion itself pulled off this balancing act in much the same way that politicians and others would later learn to handle it – by techniques of rhetorical association and dissociation (Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca 1969 [1958]). Having chosen “the cycle of water” as the overarching theme for the exhibition, the makers of the pavilion (the largest sponsor of which was the state oil company, Statoil) managed to make petroleum safe by renaming it “offshore” and by associating it, also in many other ways, with water. The pavilion’s deconstructive architecture can thus be understood as an early validation of the rhetorical practice of “putting together” and “taking apart” to make new things that serve the nation’s interests – in this case a “cycle of water” in which petroleum was a natural part. Although I posit only similarity, and not causality, the rhetorical techniques of Norway’s ’92 pavilion were in this way strikingly similar to what later became a stock argument, e.g. that Norway offers “the world’s cleanest petroleum” (see Ihlen 2007).
暴发户的白日梦
世博会是一种被称为“流行病”的修辞展示的场合,因此,它们提供了一个机会,让人们了解一个国家在特定的时间点希望人们如何看待它。在这篇文章中,我探讨了1992年西班牙塞维利亚世博会上的挪威馆,以回答挪威在20世纪90年代初想成为什么样的国家。我认为挪威馆是一个“解构的结构”,以一根有点模糊的管道为中心,标志着一个国家在石油的庇护下重塑自我。更具体地说,我认为挪威92年的展馆可以被解读为修辞技巧的早期实例,这些技巧后来成为挪威声称自己既是主要石油生产国又是环境领跑者的关键。展馆本身实现了这种平衡,其方式与政治家和其他人后来学会的处理方式大致相同——通过修辞关联和分离的技巧(Perelman & olbrecht - tyteca 1969[1958])。选择“水的循环”作为展览的首要主题,展馆的设计者(最大的赞助商是挪威国家石油公司)通过将石油重新命名为“近海”,并在许多其他方面将其与水联系起来,设法使石油安全。因此,展馆的解构主义建筑可以被理解为“组合”和“分解”的修辞实践的早期验证,以创造服务于国家利益的新事物——在这种情况下,石油是“水的循环”的自然组成部分。虽然我认为这只是相似之处,而不是因果关系,但挪威92年展馆的修辞技巧在这方面与后来成为老生常谈的论点惊人地相似,例如,挪威提供“世界上最清洁的石油”(见Ihlen 2007)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Culture Unbound
Culture Unbound Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research is a journal for border-crossing cultural research, globally open to articles from all areas in this large field, including cultural studies as well as other interdisciplinary and transnational currents for exploring cultural perspectives, issues and phenomena. It is peer-reviewed and easily accessible for downloading as open access. Culture Unbound is hosted by Linköping University Electronic Press (LiU E-Press, www.ep.liu.se). It is based on a co-operation between three Linköping University units that provide a unique profile to the journal, bridging regional and global research traditions: -The Advanced Cultural Studies Institute of Sweden (ACSIS), with interdisciplinary transnational exchange. -The Department of Culture Studies (Tema Q), with interdisciplinary research and PhD education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信