When perfectionists adopt health behaviors: perfectionism and self-efficacy as determinants of health behavior, anxiety and depression.

IF 1.1 2区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2022-11-25 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp/156145
Monika A Kozłowska, Marta Kuty-Pachecka
{"title":"When perfectionists adopt health behaviors: perfectionism and self-efficacy as determinants of health behavior, anxiety and depression.","authors":"Monika A Kozłowska, Marta Kuty-Pachecka","doi":"10.5114/cipp/156145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aims to show interrelations between self-efficacy, perfectionism (adaptive and maladaptive), health behavior, and mental health outcomes such as anxiety and depression as an exponent in maintaining optimal health. In the analyses, we focused on one category of health behaviors - preventive practices.: participants and procedure: Of the gathered data, 295 complete datasets were analyzed (age: <i>M</i> = 28.16, <i>SD</i> = 9.41; 72.8% participants female). We proposed two path models with personality traits (as exogenous variables) and health behaviors (as endogenous variables) in predicting depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple regression analysis revealed that maladaptive perfectionism and generalized self-efficacy significantly predicted health behaviors in general and mental health outcomes whereas adaptive perfectionism and generalized self-efficacy were significant predictors of preventive practices. The path analyses showed that generalized self-efficacy and perfectionism are related directly to mental health outcomes as well as indirectly, through health behaviors. Interestingly, we found a negative indirect effect of an interaction between generalized self-efficacy and preventive practices as well as of an interaction between adaptive perfectionism and preventive practices on mental health outcomes. The model fitted well with the data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings show that a balanced and more holistic approach to maintaining health is beneficial for people high in self-efficacy in comparison with high focus on disease prevention. Additionally, the results demonstrate that adaptive perfectionists and people high in self-efficacy may also be prone to anxiety and depression (not just maladaptive perfectionists) when their health focus is too narrow.</p>","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"5 1","pages":"326-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10699297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/156145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study aims to show interrelations between self-efficacy, perfectionism (adaptive and maladaptive), health behavior, and mental health outcomes such as anxiety and depression as an exponent in maintaining optimal health. In the analyses, we focused on one category of health behaviors - preventive practices.: participants and procedure: Of the gathered data, 295 complete datasets were analyzed (age: M = 28.16, SD = 9.41; 72.8% participants female). We proposed two path models with personality traits (as exogenous variables) and health behaviors (as endogenous variables) in predicting depression and anxiety.

Results: Multiple regression analysis revealed that maladaptive perfectionism and generalized self-efficacy significantly predicted health behaviors in general and mental health outcomes whereas adaptive perfectionism and generalized self-efficacy were significant predictors of preventive practices. The path analyses showed that generalized self-efficacy and perfectionism are related directly to mental health outcomes as well as indirectly, through health behaviors. Interestingly, we found a negative indirect effect of an interaction between generalized self-efficacy and preventive practices as well as of an interaction between adaptive perfectionism and preventive practices on mental health outcomes. The model fitted well with the data.

Conclusions: The findings show that a balanced and more holistic approach to maintaining health is beneficial for people high in self-efficacy in comparison with high focus on disease prevention. Additionally, the results demonstrate that adaptive perfectionists and people high in self-efficacy may also be prone to anxiety and depression (not just maladaptive perfectionists) when their health focus is too narrow.

当完美主义者采取健康行为时:完美主义和自我效能是健康行为、焦虑和抑郁的决定因素。
研究背景本研究旨在说明自我效能感、完美主义(适应性和适应性不良)、健康行为以及焦虑和抑郁等心理健康结果之间的相互关系,以此作为保持最佳健康状态的指数。在分析中,我们重点关注一类健康行为--预防措施:在收集的数据中,我们分析了 295 个完整的数据集(年龄:M = 28.16,SD = 9.41;72.8% 的参与者为女性)。我们提出了人格特质(作为外生变量)和健康行为(作为内生变量)预测抑郁和焦虑的两个路径模型:多元回归分析表明,适应性完美主义和广义自我效能感对一般健康行为和心理健康结果有显著的预测作用,而适应性完美主义和广义自我效能感对预防行为有显著的预测作用。路径分析显示,广义自我效能感和完美主义与心理健康结果直接相关,也通过健康行为间接相关。有趣的是,我们发现广义自我效能感和预防行为之间的交互作用以及适应性完美主义和预防行为之间的交互作用对心理健康结果产生了负的间接影响。该模型与数据非常吻合:研究结果表明,与高度关注疾病预防的人相比,自我效能感高的人在保持健康方面更均衡、更全面。此外,研究结果表明,如果对健康的关注过于狭隘,适应性完美主义者和自我效能感高的人也可能容易焦虑和抑郁(不仅仅是适应性完美主义者)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal remains one of the most widely read and widely cited publications in the world. It is the second most widely subscribed journal published by any law school in the country. It is one of the most widely circulated law journals in the country, and our broad readership includes judges and legal academics, as well as practitioners, criminologists, and police officers. Research in the area of criminal law and criminology addresses concerns that are pertinent to most of American society. The Journal strives to publish the very best scholarship in this area, inspiring the intellectual debate and discussion essential to the development of social reform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信