Infiltration Rates of Various Vegetative Communities within the Blue Mountains of Oregon

R. E. Gaither, J. Buckhouse
{"title":"Infiltration Rates of Various Vegetative Communities within the Blue Mountains of Oregon","authors":"R. E. Gaither, J. Buckhouse","doi":"10.2307/3897983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mean infiltration rates differed among several natural vegetation communities with ponderosa pine (Pinusponderosa) exhibiting the lowest mean infiltration rate of 6.0 cm/hr and larch (Larix occidentalis) demonstrating the highest at 8.8 cm/hr. A trend toward increasing infiitration rates corresponded to increasingly mesic sites. Alpine, Douglas fir (Psuedotsuga me&e@), mountain meadow, and larch types demonstrated the greatest vegetative cover, occupied the most mesic sites, and exhibited the highest infiltration rates. Infiltration differences within vegetative communities,based upon changes in condition and productivity were also noted. The forested sites were more dependent upon condition class than productivity class, with higher infiltration rates being exhibited on pole sites than on timbered sites, apparently in response to higher plant densities associated with the pole thickets. Nonforested sites were responsive to both productivity and condition class with higher infiltration rates being exhibited on these sites with the more productive or better condition classifications. Water is a primary factor limiting production on many western rangelands. Many of these areas are subject to low annual precipitation and high potential evaporational losses. Activities which disturb the soil surface or vegetative composition and cover have the potential for reducing soil water intake, thereby reducing productivity which in some instances may be minimal at best. A prime concern of land managers is to maintain or enhance those factors within managerial capabilities which affect soil water intakeand to identify those areas most susceptible to disturbance. Blackburn and Skau (1974) studied infiltration rates and sediment production fo 29 plant communities and soils in central and eastern Nevada. The highest infiltration rates occurred on sites with weliaggregated surface soils free of vesicular porosity. Williams et al. (1972) used multiple regression analysis to determine relationships between vegetative and soil factors and infiltration rates and erosion from 550 infiltrometer plots at chained pinyon-juniper sites in Utah. Factors found to be most important in predicting infiltration rates were: (1) total porosity in the O-8 cm layer of soil, (2) percent bare soil surface, (3) soil texture in the O-8 cm layer of soil, and (4) crown cover. Raindrop impact on bare soil tends to rapidly close the natural channels of percolation by degrading soil structure. Studies at the Manti County watershed in Utah showed that runoff varied inversely with the total amount of ground cover (Orr 1957). Vegetative cover tends to reduce the energy of rainfall by reducing velocity and by breaking the large drops into a fine spray which can then enter the soil without damage to the soil surface. Gifford (1972) reported that the ability to predict infiltration rates, using cover characteristics alone varies with time, both within a given storm The authors are teacher, Monument Elementary School, Monument. Ore., and associate professor, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Ore., respectively. This report was submitted as Technical Paper No. 5884. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station. The work upon which this report is based wassupported byfunds provided by the USDA-FS, Range Evaluation Project. Theauthors wish to thank Jon Skovlin and Reed Sanderson for the cooperation and help which they extended at all stages of this effort. Manuscript received June 8, 1981. event and on a seasonal basis. He further stated that measured cover characteristics may helpexplain hydrologic behavior of a site at one time, yet be of little value at another time. The objective of this study was to determine and compare infiltration rates within and among 10 different ecosystems found in the Oregon Range Evaluation Project Work Area.","PeriodicalId":16918,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Range Management","volume":"25 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Range Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3897983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Mean infiltration rates differed among several natural vegetation communities with ponderosa pine (Pinusponderosa) exhibiting the lowest mean infiltration rate of 6.0 cm/hr and larch (Larix occidentalis) demonstrating the highest at 8.8 cm/hr. A trend toward increasing infiitration rates corresponded to increasingly mesic sites. Alpine, Douglas fir (Psuedotsuga me&e@), mountain meadow, and larch types demonstrated the greatest vegetative cover, occupied the most mesic sites, and exhibited the highest infiltration rates. Infiltration differences within vegetative communities,based upon changes in condition and productivity were also noted. The forested sites were more dependent upon condition class than productivity class, with higher infiltration rates being exhibited on pole sites than on timbered sites, apparently in response to higher plant densities associated with the pole thickets. Nonforested sites were responsive to both productivity and condition class with higher infiltration rates being exhibited on these sites with the more productive or better condition classifications. Water is a primary factor limiting production on many western rangelands. Many of these areas are subject to low annual precipitation and high potential evaporational losses. Activities which disturb the soil surface or vegetative composition and cover have the potential for reducing soil water intake, thereby reducing productivity which in some instances may be minimal at best. A prime concern of land managers is to maintain or enhance those factors within managerial capabilities which affect soil water intakeand to identify those areas most susceptible to disturbance. Blackburn and Skau (1974) studied infiltration rates and sediment production fo 29 plant communities and soils in central and eastern Nevada. The highest infiltration rates occurred on sites with weliaggregated surface soils free of vesicular porosity. Williams et al. (1972) used multiple regression analysis to determine relationships between vegetative and soil factors and infiltration rates and erosion from 550 infiltrometer plots at chained pinyon-juniper sites in Utah. Factors found to be most important in predicting infiltration rates were: (1) total porosity in the O-8 cm layer of soil, (2) percent bare soil surface, (3) soil texture in the O-8 cm layer of soil, and (4) crown cover. Raindrop impact on bare soil tends to rapidly close the natural channels of percolation by degrading soil structure. Studies at the Manti County watershed in Utah showed that runoff varied inversely with the total amount of ground cover (Orr 1957). Vegetative cover tends to reduce the energy of rainfall by reducing velocity and by breaking the large drops into a fine spray which can then enter the soil without damage to the soil surface. Gifford (1972) reported that the ability to predict infiltration rates, using cover characteristics alone varies with time, both within a given storm The authors are teacher, Monument Elementary School, Monument. Ore., and associate professor, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Ore., respectively. This report was submitted as Technical Paper No. 5884. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station. The work upon which this report is based wassupported byfunds provided by the USDA-FS, Range Evaluation Project. Theauthors wish to thank Jon Skovlin and Reed Sanderson for the cooperation and help which they extended at all stages of this effort. Manuscript received June 8, 1981. event and on a seasonal basis. He further stated that measured cover characteristics may helpexplain hydrologic behavior of a site at one time, yet be of little value at another time. The objective of this study was to determine and compare infiltration rates within and among 10 different ecosystems found in the Oregon Range Evaluation Project Work Area.
俄勒冈州蓝山地区各种植物群落的入渗率
不同天然植被群落的平均入渗速率不同,黄松(Pinusponderosa)的平均入渗速率最低,为6.0 cm/hr,而落叶松(Larix occidentalis)的平均入渗速率最高,为8.8 cm/hr。随着网站数量的增加,网站的渗透率呈上升趋势。高山、花旗松(Psuedotsuga me&e@)、高山草甸和落叶松类型的植被覆盖面积最大,占据了最多的介位,入渗速率最高。植被群落内的入渗差异,基于条件和生产力的变化也被注意到。森林立地对条件等级的依赖性大于对生产力等级的依赖性,杆状立地的入渗速率高于木材林立地,这显然是对杆状灌丛中较高植物密度的响应。非森林样地对生产力和条件分类均有响应,在生产力较高或条件分类较好的样地表现出较高的入渗率。在许多西部牧场,水是限制生产的主要因素。其中许多地区年降水量少,潜在蒸发损失大。干扰土壤表面或植被组成和覆盖物的活动有可能减少土壤水分的摄入量,从而降低生产力,在某些情况下,这种影响可能最少。土地管理人员最关心的是维持或加强管理能力范围内影响土壤水分摄入的因素,并确定最容易受到干扰的地区。Blackburn和Skau(1974)研究了内华达州中部和东部29个植物群落和土壤的入渗率和沉积物生成。最高的入渗率发生在没有水疱孔隙的松散的表层土壤上。Williams等人(1972)利用多元回归分析,确定了犹他州连片松林550个入渗计样地的植被和土壤因子与入渗速率和侵蚀之间的关系。预测入渗速率最重要的因子有:(1)0 -8 cm土层的总孔隙度,(2)裸露土壤表面的百分比,(3)0 -8 cm土层的土壤质地,(4)树冠覆盖度。雨滴对裸露土壤的冲击往往会使土壤结构退化,从而迅速关闭天然的渗透通道。对犹他州Manti县流域的研究表明,径流与地表覆盖总量成反比(Orr 1957)。植被覆盖往往会降低降雨的能量,因为它会降低速度,并将大雨滴分解成细小的喷雾,然后进入土壤而不会损害土壤表面。Gifford(1972)报道了预测渗透速率的能力,仅使用覆盖物特征随时间而变化,在给定的风暴中,作者是教师,纪念碑小学,纪念碑。分别是俄勒冈州科瓦利斯的俄勒冈州立大学副教授。该报告作为第5884号技术文件提交。俄勒冈农业实验站。本报告所依据的工作得到了美国农业部范围评估项目提供的资金支持。作者谨感谢Jon Skovlin和Reed Sanderson在这项工作的所有阶段所提供的合作和帮助。1981年6月8日收稿。事件和季节性的基础。他进一步指出,测量的覆盖特征可能有助于解释一个地点的水文行为,但在另一个时间没有什么价值。本研究的目的是确定和比较在俄勒冈山脉评估项目工作区内发现的10个不同生态系统内部和之间的渗透率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信