Unwritten Doctrine of Pythagoras in Hermias of Alexandria

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Peitho Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.14746/pea.2022.1.9
Rogério G. De Campos
{"title":"Unwritten Doctrine of Pythagoras in Hermias of Alexandria","authors":"Rogério G. De Campos","doi":"10.14746/pea.2022.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Hermias’ commentary on Phaedrus (In Platonis Phaedrum Scholia), it is possible to identify several direct references to the philosophers and pre-Socratic doctrines, including Pythagoras. We point out to three references to Pythagoras in Hermias: (1) Pythagoras is characterized as an unwritten philosopher, (2) there is a special connection with the divinities and Muses, and (3) there is a special connection with the Phaedrus dialogue, revealed by the affinity between Pythagoras and Socrates. We show how the explicit references to Pythagoras in Hermias constitute a certain method of interpreting Platonism: as a philosophy manifested in writing, but which, at the same time, values the unwritten tradition, represented especially by Pythagoras and Socrates. We also demonstrate how the references translated and examined here reveal the image of this Neoplatonic Pythagoras of Hermias, an image which is not necessarily in tune with the oldest doxography, and which permits the reevaluation of Plato’s position as a philosopher who sought to combine unwritten doctrines with his explicit activity as a writer.","PeriodicalId":36201,"journal":{"name":"Peitho","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peitho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pea.2022.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Hermias’ commentary on Phaedrus (In Platonis Phaedrum Scholia), it is possible to identify several direct references to the philosophers and pre-Socratic doctrines, including Pythagoras. We point out to three references to Pythagoras in Hermias: (1) Pythagoras is characterized as an unwritten philosopher, (2) there is a special connection with the divinities and Muses, and (3) there is a special connection with the Phaedrus dialogue, revealed by the affinity between Pythagoras and Socrates. We show how the explicit references to Pythagoras in Hermias constitute a certain method of interpreting Platonism: as a philosophy manifested in writing, but which, at the same time, values the unwritten tradition, represented especially by Pythagoras and Socrates. We also demonstrate how the references translated and examined here reveal the image of this Neoplatonic Pythagoras of Hermias, an image which is not necessarily in tune with the oldest doxography, and which permits the reevaluation of Plato’s position as a philosopher who sought to combine unwritten doctrines with his explicit activity as a writer.
毕达哥拉斯在亚历山大的赫米亚斯的不成文学说
在赫米亚斯对《费德鲁斯篇》的评论(《柏拉图篇》)中,可以确定几个直接引用哲学家和前苏格拉底学说的地方,包括毕达哥拉斯。我们指出在赫米阿斯中有三处提到毕达哥拉斯:(1)毕达哥拉斯被描述为一位未写的哲学家;(2)毕达哥拉斯与诸神和缪斯有特殊的联系;(3)毕达哥拉斯与苏格拉底之间的亲密关系,显示出毕达哥拉斯与费德鲁斯的对话有特殊的联系。我们展示了赫米亚斯对毕达哥拉斯的明确引用如何构成了解释柏拉图主义的某种方法:作为一种以书面形式表现出来的哲学,但同时也重视以毕达哥拉斯和苏格拉底为代表的非书面传统。我们还展示了这些参考文献是如何被翻译和检查的,揭示了这个新柏拉图主义的毕达哥拉斯的赫米亚斯形象,这个形象不一定与最古老的doxography一致,它允许重新评估柏拉图作为一个哲学家的地位,他试图将不书面的教义与他作为作家的明确活动结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Peitho
Peitho Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信