La anáfora directa en la explicaciones históricas. Un análisis comparativo entre el discurso oral y escrito

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Manuel Montanero, M. Salguero, Manuel Lucero
{"title":"La anáfora directa en la explicaciones históricas. Un análisis comparativo entre el discurso oral y escrito","authors":"Manuel Montanero, M. Salguero, Manuel Lucero","doi":"10.4067/s0718-09342022000200605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the production of anaphoric devices in history teachers’ oral explanations in comparison with those in textbooks. First, a revision of the anaphora concept and its classification in the specialized literature is made. A synthesis is proposed integrating two criteria: the type of word and inference, associated to 6 types of anaphora. Second, from this classification a system of categories is constructed to compare anaphora production in a sample of 19 history texts. The results reveal a","PeriodicalId":44762,"journal":{"name":"Revista Signos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Signos","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-09342022000200605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on the production of anaphoric devices in history teachers’ oral explanations in comparison with those in textbooks. First, a revision of the anaphora concept and its classification in the specialized literature is made. A synthesis is proposed integrating two criteria: the type of word and inference, associated to 6 types of anaphora. Second, from this classification a system of categories is constructed to compare anaphora production in a sample of 19 history texts. The results reveal a
历史解释中的直接回指。口头和书面话语的比较分析
本研究主要探讨历史教师口头解释中回指语的产生,并将其与教科书进行比较。首先,对专业文献中的回指概念及其分类进行了修订。综合提出了两个标准:词的类型和推理,相关的6种类型的回指。其次,根据这一分类,构建了一个类别系统,以比较19个历史文本样本中的回指产生。研究结果揭示了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Signos
Revista Signos Multiple-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Es una revista científica cuya misión es estimular y facilitar el intercambio académico entre investigadores de la comunidad científica internacional, publicando artículos originales de investigaciones científicas tanto teóricas como aplicadas en idioma español, inglés y portugués. Su enfoque disciplinar se concentra en el área de la lingüística y en el de algunas interdisciplinas: Psicolingüística, Lingüística del Texto y del Discurso, Lingüística Aplicada y Lingüística y Computación.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信