{"title":"The Status Quo and the Feminization of Political Alternatives","authors":"Noa Balf","doi":"10.3167/ISR.2019.340103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Oslo peace process has effectively stalled and failed. In\nthis article I show that by positioning the Oslo process and any political\nand civic forces involved with it as tainted by irrational and emotional\nweakness, neo-conservative figures and institutions within Israel have\nsuccessfully argued for a hyper-masculinized Israeli security paradigm. In\nthis configuration, the process of cooperation and the acknowledgement of\nPalestinian claims are viewed as weak and reprehensible, while aggressive\nmilitary strategies, deterrence, and the demand for unequivocal Palestinian\nacceptance of Israel’s terms are perceived as rational and responsible\nactions that protect Israeli interests. By conflating security with the state,\nIsraeli political leaders perpetuate the conflict rather than resolve it.","PeriodicalId":43582,"journal":{"name":"Israel Studies Review","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ISR.2019.340103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The Oslo peace process has effectively stalled and failed. In
this article I show that by positioning the Oslo process and any political
and civic forces involved with it as tainted by irrational and emotional
weakness, neo-conservative figures and institutions within Israel have
successfully argued for a hyper-masculinized Israeli security paradigm. In
this configuration, the process of cooperation and the acknowledgement of
Palestinian claims are viewed as weak and reprehensible, while aggressive
military strategies, deterrence, and the demand for unequivocal Palestinian
acceptance of Israel’s terms are perceived as rational and responsible
actions that protect Israeli interests. By conflating security with the state,
Israeli political leaders perpetuate the conflict rather than resolve it.
期刊介绍:
Israel Studies Review (ISR) is the journal of the Association for Israel Studies, an international and interdisciplinary scholarly organization dedicated to the study of all aspects of Israeli society, history, politics, and culture. ISR explores modern and contemporary Israel from the perspective of the social sciences, history, the humanities, and cultural studies and welcomes submissions on these subjects. The journal also pays close attention to the relationships of Israel to the Middle East and to the wider world, and encourages scholarly articles with this broader theoretical or comparative approach provided the focus remains on modern Israel.