Characterization of bacterial communities in prebiotics and probiotics treated shrimp farms from Kuantan

IF 0.4 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Shing Wei Siew, Ira Nadira Kosnin, Nurul Fadzlina Zulkifli, Hajar Fauzan, Normaiza Zamri, Muhammad Fitri Yusof, Ahmad M. Gazali
{"title":"Characterization of bacterial communities in prebiotics and probiotics treated shrimp farms from Kuantan","authors":"Shing Wei Siew, Ira Nadira Kosnin, Nurul Fadzlina Zulkifli, Hajar Fauzan, Normaiza Zamri, Muhammad Fitri Yusof, Ahmad M. Gazali","doi":"10.21161/mjm.220048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Prebiotics and probiotics profoundly enhance water quality and shrimp development to tackle infectious disease in shrimp farming. This study evaluated the impact of prebiotics and probiotics treatments in water by assessing the physicochemical properties and bacterial communities in local shrimp ponds. Methodology and results: Water was collected from shrimp pond 1 (SP1), treated with prebiotics and probiotics, and shrimp pond 2 (SP2), treated with only prebiotics. The physicochemical parameters of water from two shrimp ponds were measured, including pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), ammonia concentration and temperature. The total environmental DNA (eDNA) was extracted from the water samples and sequenced using amplicon sequencing targeting the full length of the 16S rRNA gene region via the Oxford Nanopore Technology Flongle. The water quality analysis indicated that SP1 had better water quality than SP2 for shrimp aquaculture. The dominant phyla in both shrimp ponds were Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota . SP1 samples had unique microbiota at the phylum level, including Bdellovibrionota , Firmicutes A , Patescibacteria and unclassified Rhizobiales , Saprospiraceae , Vulcanococcus and HIMB114 at the genus level. The alpha-and beta-diversity showed insignificant differences in microbiota composition between SP1 and SP2 (p-value>0.05). Conclusion, significance and impact of study: Research findings demonstrated that the probiotic-treated shrimp pond (SP1) had better water quality and more diverse microbial communities than the shrimp pond that was not treated with probiotics (SP2).","PeriodicalId":18178,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Microbiology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21161/mjm.220048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Prebiotics and probiotics profoundly enhance water quality and shrimp development to tackle infectious disease in shrimp farming. This study evaluated the impact of prebiotics and probiotics treatments in water by assessing the physicochemical properties and bacterial communities in local shrimp ponds. Methodology and results: Water was collected from shrimp pond 1 (SP1), treated with prebiotics and probiotics, and shrimp pond 2 (SP2), treated with only prebiotics. The physicochemical parameters of water from two shrimp ponds were measured, including pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), ammonia concentration and temperature. The total environmental DNA (eDNA) was extracted from the water samples and sequenced using amplicon sequencing targeting the full length of the 16S rRNA gene region via the Oxford Nanopore Technology Flongle. The water quality analysis indicated that SP1 had better water quality than SP2 for shrimp aquaculture. The dominant phyla in both shrimp ponds were Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota . SP1 samples had unique microbiota at the phylum level, including Bdellovibrionota , Firmicutes A , Patescibacteria and unclassified Rhizobiales , Saprospiraceae , Vulcanococcus and HIMB114 at the genus level. The alpha-and beta-diversity showed insignificant differences in microbiota composition between SP1 and SP2 (p-value>0.05). Conclusion, significance and impact of study: Research findings demonstrated that the probiotic-treated shrimp pond (SP1) had better water quality and more diverse microbial communities than the shrimp pond that was not treated with probiotics (SP2).
关丹省益生元和益生菌处理对虾养殖场细菌群落特征
目的:益生元和益生菌能深刻改善水质和对虾发育,解决对虾养殖中的传染病问题。本研究通过对当地虾池的理化性质和细菌群落进行评估,评价了益生元和益生菌处理对水体的影响。方法与结果:从1号虾池(SP1)和2号虾池(SP2)收集水,分别用益生元和益生菌处理和单独用益生元处理。测定了两个对虾池水的理化参数,包括pH、溶解氧(DO)、氨浓度和温度。从水样中提取总环境DNA (eDNA),并通过牛津纳米孔技术Flongle对16S rRNA基因区域的全长进行扩增子测序。水质分析表明,SP1养殖对虾的水质优于SP2。两个虾池的优势门均为变形菌门和拟杆菌门。SP1样品在门水平上具有独特的微生物群,包括Bdellovibrionota、厚壁菌门A、Patescibacteria和属水平上未分类的Rhizobiales、Saprospiraceae、Vulcanococcus和HIMB114。SP1和SP2的α和β微生物群组成差异不显著(p值>0.05)。结论、研究意义及影响:研究结果表明,与未添加益生菌(SP2)的对虾池相比,添加了益生菌的对虾池(SP1)水质更好,微生物群落更多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Journal of Microbiology (MJM) publishes high quality microbiology research related to the tropics. These include infectious diseases and antimicrobials. In addition, the journal also publishes research works on the application of microbes for the betterment of human society and the environment. The journal welcomes papers on isolation, identification, characterization and application of microbes and microbial products. The MJM is published under the auspices of the Malaysian Society for Microbiology. It serves as a forum for scientific communication among scientists and academics who deal with microbes and microbial products. The journal publishes research articles, short communications and review articles on various novel aspects of microbiology, which include topics related to medical, pharmaceutical, food, agricultural, industry, plant pathology, biotechnology, microbial genetics, environment, soil, water and biodeterioration. The journal aspires to emphasize the important roles played by microbes in our daily life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信