Образ Українського Козацтва в Брошурі Пантелеймона Куліша «Крашанка Русинам і Полякам на Великдень 1882 Року»

Iryna Adamska
{"title":"Образ Українського Козацтва в Брошурі Пантелеймона Куліша «Крашанка Русинам і Полякам на Великдень 1882 Року»","authors":"Iryna Adamska","doi":"10.35757/stp.2022.50.4.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1882, one of the most famous figures of the Ukrainian nation’s nineteenth-century revival, Panteleimon Kulish, published a work entitled ‘A Painted Egg for the Ruthenians and the Poles at Easter 1882’. In his work, he called on Poles and Ukrainians to establish dialogue and reconciliation, a prerequisite for which should be a critical rethinking of the well-established historical views of both peoples. To this end, Kulish devoted considerable space to the Cossacks and haidamakas. This article analyses the image of the Cossacks on painted Easter eggs. It also examines the evolution of Kulish’s historical views and the circumstances under which they took place, traces how they were manifested in his scientific works and considers the circumstances of the publication of his work. His strong criticism of the Cossacks and haidamakas corresponded to his views on Ukraine’s history at that time, although the decision to express it publicly was made for political reasons, to reconcile the Ukrainians with the Poles. To convince readers of his views, Kulish critically reinterpreted sources from the Cossack era and criticised both the Cossacks generally and specific historical figures, as well as some events of the early modern era. Kulish’s position was criticised by other representatives of the Ukrainian national movement. The reaction of the Polish political elite and intellectuals also failed to meet his expectations. As a result, disappointed by the ineffectiveness of his political manifesto, the Ukrainian intellectual gave up his efforts to strengthen Polish-Ukrainian dialogue.","PeriodicalId":34824,"journal":{"name":"Srodkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Srodkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35757/stp.2022.50.4.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1882, one of the most famous figures of the Ukrainian nation’s nineteenth-century revival, Panteleimon Kulish, published a work entitled ‘A Painted Egg for the Ruthenians and the Poles at Easter 1882’. In his work, he called on Poles and Ukrainians to establish dialogue and reconciliation, a prerequisite for which should be a critical rethinking of the well-established historical views of both peoples. To this end, Kulish devoted considerable space to the Cossacks and haidamakas. This article analyses the image of the Cossacks on painted Easter eggs. It also examines the evolution of Kulish’s historical views and the circumstances under which they took place, traces how they were manifested in his scientific works and considers the circumstances of the publication of his work. His strong criticism of the Cossacks and haidamakas corresponded to his views on Ukraine’s history at that time, although the decision to express it publicly was made for political reasons, to reconcile the Ukrainians with the Poles. To convince readers of his views, Kulish critically reinterpreted sources from the Cossack era and criticised both the Cossacks generally and specific historical figures, as well as some events of the early modern era. Kulish’s position was criticised by other representatives of the Ukrainian national movement. The reaction of the Polish political elite and intellectuals also failed to meet his expectations. As a result, disappointed by the ineffectiveness of his political manifesto, the Ukrainian intellectual gave up his efforts to strengthen Polish-Ukrainian dialogue.
1882年,乌克兰19世纪复兴运动中最著名的人物之一潘特莱蒙·库利什(Panteleimon Kulish)出版了一本名为《1882年复活节鲁塞尼亚人和波兰人的彩绘彩蛋》的作品。在他的作品中,他呼吁波兰人和乌克兰人建立对话与和解,其先决条件应该是对两国人民根深蒂固的历史观进行批判性的重新思考。为此,库利什用了相当大的篇幅来描述哥萨克人和海达马卡人。本文分析了复活节彩蛋上哥萨克人的形象。它还考察了库利什历史观的演变及其发生的环境,追溯了这些观点是如何在他的科学著作中体现出来的,并考虑了他的作品发表的环境。他对哥萨克人和海达马卡人的强烈批评与他当时对乌克兰历史的看法一致,尽管公开表达这种批评的决定是出于政治原因,是为了让乌克兰人与波兰人和解。为了让读者相信他的观点,库利什批判性地重新解释了哥萨克时代的资料,批评了哥萨克人的总体情况和具体的历史人物,以及近代早期的一些事件。库利什的立场受到了乌克兰民族运动其他代表的批评。波兰政治精英和知识分子的反应也未能达到他的期望。结果,这位乌克兰知识分子对其政治宣言的无效感到失望,放弃了加强波兰与乌克兰对话的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书