J. Rubin
求助PDF
{"title":"Rethinking the Creation of Cultural Hierarchy in America","authors":"J. Rubin","doi":"10.5325/RECEPTION.6.1.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"vol. 6, 2014 Copyright © 2014 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA The year 2013 marked the twenty-fifth anniversary of the publication of Lawrence Levine’s Highbrow/ Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. The book was immediately, and wildly, influential among American cultural historians and students of American literature. I remember attending a national meeting shortly after it came out where participants reverentially invoked Levine’s key terms and assumptions, as if they had discovered in the book’s pages an explanation, deeply satisfying both ideologically and emotionally, for a phenomenon that had long been troubling them. In the years since 1988, Highbrow/Lowbrow has exhibited the staying power of a classic, a status certified by the book’s appearance on countless syllabi and oral exam lists. Today it remains available in paperback and in a Kindle version, and I am told that a French edition was just recently published. Many of us have profited a great deal from Levine’s study, and we lament his untimely death in 2006. Yet those of us who have been working in the history of the book and related areas have arrived at a point where we might profitably reassess the arguments of Highbrow/Lowbrow, instead of merely appropriating its framework. What have we learned over the last twentyfive years about cultural hierarchy in America? What Rethinking the Creation of Cultural Hierarchy in America","PeriodicalId":40584,"journal":{"name":"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History","volume":"1 1","pages":"18 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/RECEPTION.6.1.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
引用
批量引用
重新思考美国文化等级制度的形成
2014年第6卷版权所有©2014宾夕法尼亚州立大学,宾州大学公园2013年是劳伦斯·莱文的《高雅/低俗:美国文化等级的出现》出版25周年。这本书立即在美国文化历史学家和研究美国文学的学生中产生了广泛的影响。我记得在这本书出版后不久,我参加了一次全国会议,与会者虔诚地引用了莱文的关键术语和假设,就好像他们在书中找到了一个解释,对一个长期困扰他们的现象在思想上和情感上都得到了极大的满足。自1988年以来,《高雅/低俗》展现了经典的持久力,这本书出现在无数的教学大纲和口试表上,证明了它的地位。如今,这本书仍有平装本和Kindle版,我还听说,法文版最近刚刚出版。我们中的许多人都从莱文的研究中获益良多,我们对他在2006年的英年早逝表示哀悼。然而,我们这些一直在研究书籍历史和相关领域的人已经到达了一个点,我们可以重新评估高雅/低俗的论点,而不仅仅是占用它的框架。在过去的25年里,我们从美国的文化等级制度中学到了什么?反思美国文化等级制度的形成
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。