Coupling genetic and mechanistic models to benchmark selection strategies for feed efficiency in dairy cows: sensitivity analysis validating this novel approach

A. Bouquet , M. Slagboom , J.R. Thomasen , N.C. Friggens , M. Kargo , L. Puillet
{"title":"Coupling genetic and mechanistic models to benchmark selection strategies for feed efficiency in dairy cows: sensitivity analysis validating this novel approach","authors":"A. Bouquet ,&nbsp;M. Slagboom ,&nbsp;J.R. Thomasen ,&nbsp;N.C. Friggens ,&nbsp;M. Kargo ,&nbsp;L. Puillet","doi":"10.1016/j.anopes.2022.100017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coupling genetic and mechanistic models is appealing to explore the impact of energy trade-offs on the expression of feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle and predict selection response. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of genetic (co)variances among milk production and feed efficiency (<strong>FE</strong>) traits simulated with a mechanistic dairy cow model depending on the genetic variability assumed for input parameters. The cow model was calibrated for a grass-based production and included a genetic module. Four genetically driven input parameters described the energy acquisition and allocation to different biological functions of cows. In each simulation, a population of 20 000 cows from 200 unrelated sires was simulated. The nutritional environment was an input of the model and was tailored by modulating feed offer and quality. A non-limiting nutritional environment was simulated to mimic a situation of <em>ad libitum</em> feeding and was used as a reference. Two other scenarios were simulated by imposing a moderate and a high DM intake restriction on simulated cows. Five phenotypes related to milk production and FE were considered: milk production, BW at calving, DM intake, lactation efficiency and body reserves during early lactation. These traits were estimated both in first and third lactations. A baseline scenario was defined considering a heritability of 0.35 and a phenotypic CV of 10% for acquisition and allocation parameters (<strong>AAPs</strong>). Different scenarios were explored by reducing the heritability to 0.15 or increasing CV to 20 and 30% or both. Heritabilities and genetic correlations between simulated traits were estimated using animal linear mixed models. Each scenario was replicated 20 times. Simulated performance and genetic parameters for these traits were compared across scenarios using an ANOVA. The heritability of AAPs only influenced the heritability of simulated traits. The phenotypic CV of AAPs mainly influenced the variability of simulated traits. However, increasing the CV also affected the number of cows reaching first and third lactation, due to the early culling of females with extreme AAPs profiles. Compared to other input parameters, the nutritional environment had the largest effect on both performance and genetic correlations between traits. Using a heritability value of 0.35 and a CV of 10% for all four AAPs enabled the simulation of milk production and FE performance with a realistic mean, variance and genetic correlations among traits in the three considered environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100083,"journal":{"name":"Animal - Open Space","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772694022000140/pdfft?md5=22489e392ecb1614775ecd5f79991e20&pid=1-s2.0-S2772694022000140-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal - Open Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772694022000140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Coupling genetic and mechanistic models is appealing to explore the impact of energy trade-offs on the expression of feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle and predict selection response. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of genetic (co)variances among milk production and feed efficiency (FE) traits simulated with a mechanistic dairy cow model depending on the genetic variability assumed for input parameters. The cow model was calibrated for a grass-based production and included a genetic module. Four genetically driven input parameters described the energy acquisition and allocation to different biological functions of cows. In each simulation, a population of 20 000 cows from 200 unrelated sires was simulated. The nutritional environment was an input of the model and was tailored by modulating feed offer and quality. A non-limiting nutritional environment was simulated to mimic a situation of ad libitum feeding and was used as a reference. Two other scenarios were simulated by imposing a moderate and a high DM intake restriction on simulated cows. Five phenotypes related to milk production and FE were considered: milk production, BW at calving, DM intake, lactation efficiency and body reserves during early lactation. These traits were estimated both in first and third lactations. A baseline scenario was defined considering a heritability of 0.35 and a phenotypic CV of 10% for acquisition and allocation parameters (AAPs). Different scenarios were explored by reducing the heritability to 0.15 or increasing CV to 20 and 30% or both. Heritabilities and genetic correlations between simulated traits were estimated using animal linear mixed models. Each scenario was replicated 20 times. Simulated performance and genetic parameters for these traits were compared across scenarios using an ANOVA. The heritability of AAPs only influenced the heritability of simulated traits. The phenotypic CV of AAPs mainly influenced the variability of simulated traits. However, increasing the CV also affected the number of cows reaching first and third lactation, due to the early culling of females with extreme AAPs profiles. Compared to other input parameters, the nutritional environment had the largest effect on both performance and genetic correlations between traits. Using a heritability value of 0.35 and a CV of 10% for all four AAPs enabled the simulation of milk production and FE performance with a realistic mean, variance and genetic correlations among traits in the three considered environments.

将遗传和机制模型耦合到奶牛饲料效率的基准选择策略:敏感性分析验证这种新方法
遗传和机制耦合模型有助于探索能量权衡对奶牛饲料效率性状表达的影响,并预测选择反应。本研究的目的是利用机械奶牛模型模拟产奶量和饲料效率性状的遗传变异,根据输入参数的遗传变异来评估遗传变异的敏感性。奶牛模型是为以草为基础的生产而校准的,并包括一个遗传模块。四个基因驱动的输入参数描述了奶牛能量的获取和分配到不同的生物功能。在每次模拟中,来自200个不相关的奶牛种群的2万头奶牛被模拟。营养环境是模型的输入,并通过调节饲料供应和质量来定制。模拟非限制性营养环境,模拟自由摄食的情况,并作为参考。通过对模拟奶牛施加中等和高DM摄入量限制,模拟另外两种情况。考虑产奶量和FE相关的5种表型:产奶量、产犊体重、DM摄入量、泌乳效率和泌乳早期体储备。这些特征在第一次和第三次哺乳时都得到了估计。基线情景的定义考虑了获得和分配参数(AAPs)的遗传率为0.35,表型CV为10%。通过将遗传力降低到0.15或将CV提高到20%和30%或两者兼而有之,探索了不同的情况。利用动物线性混合模型估计了模拟性状之间的遗传力和遗传相关性。每个场景都被重复了20次。使用方差分析比较这些性状的模拟性能和遗传参数。AAPs的遗传力只影响模拟性状的遗传力。AAPs的表型变异主要影响模拟性状的变异。然而,CV的增加也会影响到达第一次和第三次泌乳的奶牛数量,因为AAPs特征极端的奶牛会被提前淘汰。与其他输入参数相比,营养环境对生产性能和性状间遗传相关性的影响最大。所有4种aap的遗传力值为0.35,CV值为10%,这使得在3种考虑的环境中,能够以真实的平均值、方差和性状之间的遗传相关性来模拟产奶量和FE性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信