Technology infiltration: permeable boundaries and work–life spillover experiences among academics in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
C. Mordi, H. Ajonbadi, O. Adekoya
{"title":"Technology infiltration: permeable boundaries and work–life spillover experiences among academics in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"C. Mordi, H. Ajonbadi, O. Adekoya","doi":"10.1108/pr-10-2022-0693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study explored the challenges academics faced with work structures during the COVID-19 pandemic and their implications for their work–life balance (WLB).Design/methodology/approachRelying on the interpretative paradigm and the qualitative research method, the dataset consists of semi-structured interviews with 43 academics in the United Kingdom.FindingsThis study’s findings indicate that academics in the UK experience issues around increased boundary permeability between work and nonwork domains and role overlap, which engender the transfer of negative rather than positive spillover experiences and exacerbate negative consequences to the well-being of academics. ICTs also reinforced gendered work-family boundaries and generated more negative work–life/family spillover for women than for men.Practical implicationsHigher Education Institutions (HEIs) need to address ICT-related health issues through better work designs and HR initiatives that respond to the health requirements of academics. Policymakers should be futuristic and ensure comprehensive work–life policies for academics, which are necessary for humanising overall organisational well-being.Originality/valueAlthough COVID-19 challenges are common to all workers, the experiences and effects on specific workers (in this case, UK academics) within specific national jurisdictions play out differentially, and they are often experienced with different levels of depth and intensity.","PeriodicalId":48148,"journal":{"name":"Personnel Review","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personnel Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-10-2022-0693","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study explored the challenges academics faced with work structures during the COVID-19 pandemic and their implications for their work–life balance (WLB).Design/methodology/approachRelying on the interpretative paradigm and the qualitative research method, the dataset consists of semi-structured interviews with 43 academics in the United Kingdom.FindingsThis study’s findings indicate that academics in the UK experience issues around increased boundary permeability between work and nonwork domains and role overlap, which engender the transfer of negative rather than positive spillover experiences and exacerbate negative consequences to the well-being of academics. ICTs also reinforced gendered work-family boundaries and generated more negative work–life/family spillover for women than for men.Practical implicationsHigher Education Institutions (HEIs) need to address ICT-related health issues through better work designs and HR initiatives that respond to the health requirements of academics. Policymakers should be futuristic and ensure comprehensive work–life policies for academics, which are necessary for humanising overall organisational well-being.Originality/valueAlthough COVID-19 challenges are common to all workers, the experiences and effects on specific workers (in this case, UK academics) within specific national jurisdictions play out differentially, and they are often experienced with different levels of depth and intensity.
技术渗透:新冠肺炎大流行期间英国学术界的可渗透边界和工作-生活溢出经验
目的本研究旨在探讨新冠肺炎疫情期间学术界在工作结构方面面临的挑战及其对工作与生活平衡的影响。基于解释性范式和定性研究方法,数据集由对43位英国学者的半结构化访谈组成。研究结果本研究的结果表明,英国学术界在工作和非工作领域之间的边界渗透性增加以及角色重叠方面遇到了问题,这导致了负面溢出经验的转移,而不是积极的溢出经验,并加剧了对学术界福祉的负面影响。信息通信技术还强化了工作与家庭的性别界限,对女性造成的工作与生活/家庭的负面溢出效应大于对男性。实际影响高等教育机构需要通过更好的工作设计和人力资源举措来解决与信通技术有关的健康问题,以响应学术界的健康要求。政策制定者应该着眼于未来,确保为学者制定全面的工作-生活政策,这对于使整个组织的福祉人性化是必要的。虽然COVID-19的挑战对所有工作人员来说都是共同的,但在特定的国家管辖范围内,对特定工作人员(在本例中是英国学者)的经历和影响是不同的,而且经历的深度和强度往往不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personnel Review
Personnel Review Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Personnel Review (PR) publishes rigorous, well written articles from a range of theoretical and methodological traditions. We value articles that have high originality and that engage with contemporary challenges to human resource management theory, policy and practice development. Research that highlights innovation and emerging issues in the field, and the medium- to long-term impact of HRM policy and practice, is especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信