Interactions between bacteria and coprophilous Ascomycotina and a Coprinus species on agar and in copromes

H.M. Safar, R.C. Cooke
{"title":"Interactions between bacteria and coprophilous Ascomycotina and a Coprinus species on agar and in copromes","authors":"H.M. Safar,&nbsp;R.C. Cooke","doi":"10.1016/S0007-1536(88)80008-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effects of <em>Flavobacterium, Methanobacterium, Pseudomonas</em> and <em>Staphylococcus</em> on ascospore germination and mycelial extension in <em>Ascobolus crenulatus, Chaetomium bostrychodes</em> and <em>Sordaria macrospora</em> were studied on agar. Bacteria or their culture filtrates inhibited germination except for <em>Methanobacterium — S. macrospora</em> where only filtrate did so. Bacteria and filtrates reduced germ-tube extension in <em>S. macrospora</em> but had a less consistent effect on <em>A. crenulatus</em> and <em>C. bostrychodes</em>. Mycelial growth of <em>C. bostrychodes</em> and <em>S. macrospora</em> was inhibited by the presence of all bacteria, the effect being especially severe for the latter. By contrast, mycelial growth of <em>A. crenulatus</em> was stimulated by all bacteria.</p><p>When paired with Ascomycotina in copromes, bacteria generally reduced ascocarp production but had little effect on coprome dry weight losses. In the presence of all three Ascomycotina in copromes, bacteria had a differential effect on fruiting such that ascocarp production by <em>A. crenulatus</em> was enhanced whilst that of the other two species was reduced. The exception was <em>Staphylococcus</em> which inhibited fruiting in <em>A. crenulatus</em> and <em>S. macrospora</em> but had little effect on <em>C. bostrychodes</em>.</p><p>When all three Ascomycotina were present in copromes the addition of <em>Coprinus</em> to the community resulted in only <em>S. macrospora</em> producing ascocarps. Addition of bacteria to the community had a differential effect on the <em>Coprinus</em>-induced fruiting pattern, with <em>Flavobacterium</em> and <em>Methanobacterium</em> facilitating fruiting by all three Ascomycotina.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101257,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the British Mycological Society","volume":"91 1","pages":"Pages 73-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0007-1536(88)80008-1","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the British Mycological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007153688800081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The effects of Flavobacterium, Methanobacterium, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus on ascospore germination and mycelial extension in Ascobolus crenulatus, Chaetomium bostrychodes and Sordaria macrospora were studied on agar. Bacteria or their culture filtrates inhibited germination except for Methanobacterium — S. macrospora where only filtrate did so. Bacteria and filtrates reduced germ-tube extension in S. macrospora but had a less consistent effect on A. crenulatus and C. bostrychodes. Mycelial growth of C. bostrychodes and S. macrospora was inhibited by the presence of all bacteria, the effect being especially severe for the latter. By contrast, mycelial growth of A. crenulatus was stimulated by all bacteria.

When paired with Ascomycotina in copromes, bacteria generally reduced ascocarp production but had little effect on coprome dry weight losses. In the presence of all three Ascomycotina in copromes, bacteria had a differential effect on fruiting such that ascocarp production by A. crenulatus was enhanced whilst that of the other two species was reduced. The exception was Staphylococcus which inhibited fruiting in A. crenulatus and S. macrospora but had little effect on C. bostrychodes.

When all three Ascomycotina were present in copromes the addition of Coprinus to the community resulted in only S. macrospora producing ascocarps. Addition of bacteria to the community had a differential effect on the Coprinus-induced fruiting pattern, with Flavobacterium and Methanobacterium facilitating fruiting by all three Ascomycotina.

细菌与腐殖质子囊菌和一种腐殖质菌种在琼脂和腐殖质上的相互作用
在琼脂培养基上研究了黄杆菌、甲烷杆菌、假单胞菌和葡萄球菌对牛皮球囊菌、毛毛菌和大孢子索达菌子囊孢子萌发和菌丝延伸的影响。细菌或其培养滤液抑制萌发,但大孢子甲烷杆菌只有滤液才有这种作用。细菌和滤液减少了大孢子孢芽孢杆菌的胚管延伸,但对crenulatus和bostrychodes的影响不太一致。所有细菌的存在均抑制了bostrychodes和S. macrospora菌丝的生长,其中后者的影响尤为严重。与此相反,所有细菌均能促进棘球绦虫菌丝生长。当在coprome中与子囊菌属配对时,细菌通常会降低子囊菌的产量,但对coprome的干重损失影响不大。在copromes中存在所有三种子囊菌属时,细菌对结果有不同的影响,例如a . crenulatus的子囊菌属产量增加,而其他两种的子囊菌属产量减少。但葡萄球菌对crenulatus和S. macrospora的结果有抑制作用,而对bostrychodes的结果影响不大。当所有三种子囊菌都存在于子囊菌群中时,在群落中添加子囊菌只产生大孢子s。在群落中添加不同的细菌对铜霉素诱导的子囊菌结果模式有不同的影响,黄杆菌和甲烷杆菌促进了这三种子囊菌的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信