Comparison of Settlements of Buildings on Soil-Cement Soil Bases Determined Analytically and by Long-Term Geodetic Observations

Y. Vynnykov, R. Razdui
{"title":"Comparison of Settlements of Buildings on Soil-Cement Soil Bases Determined Analytically and by Long-Term Geodetic Observations","authors":"Y. Vynnykov, R. Razdui","doi":"10.4028/p-X7FhPI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparative results of settlements of soil-cement soil bases of multi-story residential buildings determined by the methods of linear soil mechanics, finite element modeling in a planar (2D) and spatial (3D) setting using an elastic-plastic soil model, as well as long-term (over ten years) data of geodetic observations of natural objects are given. The object of this work was to evaluate the reliability of various methods of predicting the settlements of soil-cement soil bases of buildings on strip foundations in the presence of weak soils within the compressible soil thickness and reinforcement of the massif to a depth smaller than the width of the foundations. It was established that in the presence of layers of weak soils within the compressible soil thickness under strip foundations and reinforcement of the massif to a depth less than their width the actual settlements of such soil base exceeds the values allowed by the norms. The scientific novelty of the work is it was determined in the first time that under these conditions the methods of linear soil mechanics underestimate the calculated settlements by more than two times compared to their actual values. On the other hand, the high reliability of the use of mathematical modeling methods using the elastic-plastic soil model has been proven.","PeriodicalId":10603,"journal":{"name":"Construction Technologies and Architecture","volume":"9 1","pages":"39 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Technologies and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-X7FhPI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparative results of settlements of soil-cement soil bases of multi-story residential buildings determined by the methods of linear soil mechanics, finite element modeling in a planar (2D) and spatial (3D) setting using an elastic-plastic soil model, as well as long-term (over ten years) data of geodetic observations of natural objects are given. The object of this work was to evaluate the reliability of various methods of predicting the settlements of soil-cement soil bases of buildings on strip foundations in the presence of weak soils within the compressible soil thickness and reinforcement of the massif to a depth smaller than the width of the foundations. It was established that in the presence of layers of weak soils within the compressible soil thickness under strip foundations and reinforcement of the massif to a depth less than their width the actual settlements of such soil base exceeds the values allowed by the norms. The scientific novelty of the work is it was determined in the first time that under these conditions the methods of linear soil mechanics underestimate the calculated settlements by more than two times compared to their actual values. On the other hand, the high reliability of the use of mathematical modeling methods using the elastic-plastic soil model has been proven.
水泥土地基上建筑物沉降分析与长期大地测量的比较
本文给出了用线性土力学方法、平面(2D)有限元模型和弹塑性土模型(3D)有限元模型确定的多层住宅水泥土地基沉降的对比结果,以及长期(10年以上)自然地物的大地测量观测数据。这项工作的目的是评估各种预测条形基础上建筑物的水泥土地基沉降的方法的可靠性,在可压缩土厚度内存在软弱土,并且块体的加固深度小于基础的宽度。结果表明,在条形基础下可压缩土厚度内存在软弱土层,且土体加固深度小于其宽度时,这种地基的实际沉降超过规范允许的值。这项工作的科学新颖之处在于,它首次确定了在这些条件下,线性土力学方法比实际值低估了两倍以上的计算沉降。另一方面,采用弹塑性土模型的数学建模方法具有较高的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书