Analysis of Computer-Generated Drug Label Errors in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Ahmed A. Abusham, H. AlRawahi
{"title":"Analysis of Computer-Generated Drug Label Errors in a Tertiary Care Hospital","authors":"Ahmed A. Abusham, H. AlRawahi","doi":"10.5530/JPPCM.2018.3.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Electronic Systems and recommendations have been developed to facilitate the medication dispensing process, but on the other hand, they may generate dispensing errors themselves. This study is meant to assess the computer-generated drug label errors (CGDLEs). Objective: The main objective of this study is to identify the pattern and assess the significance of CGDLEs in a tertiary care hospital. Methodology: A total of 292 computer-generated drug label errors involving 169 patients and 61 medications were researched over 3 months (from January 1, 2017, to Mar 30, 2017) in a 500-bed tertiary care hospital. Collected data included patient demographics, type of error, error-related medications, time taken to resolve the error, station where error was identified and the clinical significance of the error. Analyses were conducted using STATA® v14.2 with descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Thirty eight percent of the detected CGDLEs were considered major. Patients age ranged between 0.2 to 97 years (M+SD=36.4+24.3). Errors within the age group of 0.2 to 2 years represented 7.89% of the total errors. Errors within the age group of 61 years and above represented 21.91% of the total errors. Duration of therapy represents 34.59% of the total errors, followed by instructions for use (29.45%) and drug dose (19.86%). The major CGDLEs commonly include medications like tacrolimus (17.69%), methotrexate (16.81%) and ciclosporin (15.40%). Conclusion: A considerable proportion of all CGDLEs was observed. Many of these errors were serious and could directly affect the wellbeing of patients. Fortunately, these errors were captured before reaching patients. Urgent assessment of the system that generates such labels is required. Key words: Computer-generated drug label, Dispensing errors, Medication errors.","PeriodicalId":16825,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/JPPCM.2018.3.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electronic Systems and recommendations have been developed to facilitate the medication dispensing process, but on the other hand, they may generate dispensing errors themselves. This study is meant to assess the computer-generated drug label errors (CGDLEs). Objective: The main objective of this study is to identify the pattern and assess the significance of CGDLEs in a tertiary care hospital. Methodology: A total of 292 computer-generated drug label errors involving 169 patients and 61 medications were researched over 3 months (from January 1, 2017, to Mar 30, 2017) in a 500-bed tertiary care hospital. Collected data included patient demographics, type of error, error-related medications, time taken to resolve the error, station where error was identified and the clinical significance of the error. Analyses were conducted using STATA® v14.2 with descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Thirty eight percent of the detected CGDLEs were considered major. Patients age ranged between 0.2 to 97 years (M+SD=36.4+24.3). Errors within the age group of 0.2 to 2 years represented 7.89% of the total errors. Errors within the age group of 61 years and above represented 21.91% of the total errors. Duration of therapy represents 34.59% of the total errors, followed by instructions for use (29.45%) and drug dose (19.86%). The major CGDLEs commonly include medications like tacrolimus (17.69%), methotrexate (16.81%) and ciclosporin (15.40%). Conclusion: A considerable proportion of all CGDLEs was observed. Many of these errors were serious and could directly affect the wellbeing of patients. Fortunately, these errors were captured before reaching patients. Urgent assessment of the system that generates such labels is required. Key words: Computer-generated drug label, Dispensing errors, Medication errors.
某三级医院计算机生成药品标签错误分析
背景:电子系统和建议已经开发,以促进药物调剂过程,但另一方面,他们可能会产生调剂错误。本研究旨在评估计算机生成的药物标签错误(cgdle)。目的:本研究的主要目的是确定三级医院cgdle的模式并评估其意义。方法:在3个月内(2017年1月1日至2017年3月30日)对某拥有500张床位的三级医院共292个计算机生成的药品标签错误进行研究,涉及169名患者和61种药物。收集的数据包括患者人口统计、错误类型、与错误相关的药物、解决错误所需的时间、发现错误的地点以及错误的临床意义。使用STATA®v14.2进行分析,并进行描述性和推断性统计。结果:38%的cgdle被认为是严重的。患者年龄0.2 ~ 97岁(M+SD=36.4+24.3)。0.2 ~ 2岁年龄组的差错占总差错的7.89%。61岁及以上年龄组的差错占总差错的21.91%。治疗时间错误占总错误的34.59%,其次是使用说明错误(29.45%)和药物剂量错误(19.86%)。主要的药物包括他克莫司(17.69%)、甲氨蝶呤(16.81%)和环孢素(15.40%)。结论:所有cgdle中有相当大的比例被观察到。其中许多错误都很严重,可能直接影响患者的健康。幸运的是,这些错误在到达患者之前就被捕获了。需要对产生此类标签的系统进行紧急评估。关键词:计算机生成药品标签;调剂错误;用药错误
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信