Walking devices used by community-dwelling elderly: Proportion, types, and associated factors

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Patcharawan Suwannarat PT, PhD Candidate , Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij PT, PhD , Supapon Kaewsanmung PT, MSc , Lugkana Mato PT, PhD , Sugalya Amatachaya PT, PhD
{"title":"Walking devices used by community-dwelling elderly: Proportion, types, and associated factors","authors":"Patcharawan Suwannarat PT, PhD Candidate ,&nbsp;Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Supapon Kaewsanmung PT, MSc ,&nbsp;Lugkana Mato PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Sugalya Amatachaya PT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2014.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Advancing age is likely to increase the requirement for walking devices. However, the existing evidence mostly involves all types of external devices used from participants in developed countries with or without medical problems. The findings may be different from the data on the use of walking devices exclusively, particularly for the elderly who live in a rural community of a developing country.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study explored the proportion, types, and factors associated with the use of walking devices in 343 elderly aged ≥ 65 years who live in a rural area of Thailand.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The participants were interviewed and assessed for their walking device used and functional mobility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data demonstrated that 74 participants (22%) used a walking device for mobility. Most of them used a modified walking stick (70%), followed by a standard single cane (27%), and a walker (3%). Although most of these participants used a walking device due to their own determination with only a few of them using it according to medical prescription, their functional ability was significantly poorer than those who walked without a walking device (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Being unable to walk faster than 1 m/s and having a caregiver had the strongest relationship with the use of a walking device. The findings may be related to the study's locations. Being in a rural community of a developing country with a low level of education, participants may encounter some difficulty in accessing proper medical services. Therefore they used a device that could possibly help them to execute daily activities independently.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings may provide an insight into planning programmes for health monitoring and promotion, and medical services for community-dwelling elderly who live in a similar context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2014.11.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013702514000463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background

Advancing age is likely to increase the requirement for walking devices. However, the existing evidence mostly involves all types of external devices used from participants in developed countries with or without medical problems. The findings may be different from the data on the use of walking devices exclusively, particularly for the elderly who live in a rural community of a developing country.

Objective

This study explored the proportion, types, and factors associated with the use of walking devices in 343 elderly aged ≥ 65 years who live in a rural area of Thailand.

Methods

The participants were interviewed and assessed for their walking device used and functional mobility.

Results

The data demonstrated that 74 participants (22%) used a walking device for mobility. Most of them used a modified walking stick (70%), followed by a standard single cane (27%), and a walker (3%). Although most of these participants used a walking device due to their own determination with only a few of them using it according to medical prescription, their functional ability was significantly poorer than those who walked without a walking device (p < 0.05). Being unable to walk faster than 1 m/s and having a caregiver had the strongest relationship with the use of a walking device. The findings may be related to the study's locations. Being in a rural community of a developing country with a low level of education, participants may encounter some difficulty in accessing proper medical services. Therefore they used a device that could possibly help them to execute daily activities independently.

Conclusion

Our findings may provide an insight into planning programmes for health monitoring and promotion, and medical services for community-dwelling elderly who live in a similar context.

社区居住老年人使用的步行设备:比例、类型及相关因素
年龄的增长可能会增加对步行设备的需求。然而,现有证据主要涉及发达国家参与者使用的所有类型的外部装置,无论是否存在医疗问题。研究结果可能与仅使用步行设备的数据不同,特别是对于生活在发展中国家农村社区的老年人。目的探讨泰国农村地区343名≥65岁老年人使用步行设备的比例、类型及相关因素。方法对参与者进行访谈,并对其使用的步行设备和功能活动能力进行评估。结果74名参与者(22%)使用步行设备进行活动。其中大多数人使用改良手杖(70%),其次是标准单手杖(27%)和助行器(3%)。虽然这些参与者大多是出于自己的决定而使用步行设备,只有少数人是根据医生的处方使用的,但他们的功能能力明显不如没有步行设备的人(p <0.05)。行走速度不能超过1米/秒和有看护人与行走设备的使用关系最密切。这些发现可能与研究的地点有关。由于在发展中国家的农村社区,受教育程度较低,参与者在获得适当的医疗服务方面可能会遇到一些困难。因此,他们使用了一种可能帮助他们独立执行日常活动的设备。结论本研究结果可为社区居住老年人的健康监测和促进计划以及医疗服务提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信