Mechanical Analysis of a Novel Biodegradable Zinc Alloy Stent Based on Degradation Model

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Kun Peng, Xinyang Cui, A. Qiao, M. Ohta, K. Shimoyama, Y. Mu
{"title":"Mechanical Analysis of a Novel Biodegradable Zinc Alloy Stent Based on Degradation Model","authors":"Kun Peng, Xinyang Cui, A. Qiao, M. Ohta, K. Shimoyama, Y. Mu","doi":"10.32604/mcb.2019.05729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biodegradable stents which can avoid risks caused by incompatibility between artery and permanent stents are attracting much interests. However, biodegradable stents have not been extensively applied in clinical therapy because of their insufficient scaffold performance as a result of poor Young’s Modulus of biodegradable materials and weaken structures in degradation process. In this study, a patented stent and a common stent were simulated to degrade in a 40% stenotic vesel based on a corrosion model involving uniform corrosion and stress corrosion. In the degradation process, the scaffold performance of the two stents and their functionality on reshaping diseased vessels are analyzed. The results showed that radial recoiling ratio and mass loss ratio of the common stent is 22.6% and 14.1%, respectively. In comparison, radial recoiling ratio and mass loss ratio of the common stent are definitely lower than those of the common stent, at the value of 7.19% and 3.1%. It is indicated that the patented stent still has a stronger scaffold performance compared with the common stent. Besides, with positive influence of the patented stent on stenotic vessel, a larger and flatter lumen was observed in the plaque deployed with the patented stent. It implies that mechanical performance of biodegradable stents and their functionality highly depend on their geometries. Owing to improved mechanical performance induced by structural innovation, the novel biodegradable zinc alloy stent is promised to be an alternative choice in intervention surgeries.","PeriodicalId":48719,"journal":{"name":"Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32604/mcb.2019.05729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodegradable stents which can avoid risks caused by incompatibility between artery and permanent stents are attracting much interests. However, biodegradable stents have not been extensively applied in clinical therapy because of their insufficient scaffold performance as a result of poor Young’s Modulus of biodegradable materials and weaken structures in degradation process. In this study, a patented stent and a common stent were simulated to degrade in a 40% stenotic vesel based on a corrosion model involving uniform corrosion and stress corrosion. In the degradation process, the scaffold performance of the two stents and their functionality on reshaping diseased vessels are analyzed. The results showed that radial recoiling ratio and mass loss ratio of the common stent is 22.6% and 14.1%, respectively. In comparison, radial recoiling ratio and mass loss ratio of the common stent are definitely lower than those of the common stent, at the value of 7.19% and 3.1%. It is indicated that the patented stent still has a stronger scaffold performance compared with the common stent. Besides, with positive influence of the patented stent on stenotic vessel, a larger and flatter lumen was observed in the plaque deployed with the patented stent. It implies that mechanical performance of biodegradable stents and their functionality highly depend on their geometries. Owing to improved mechanical performance induced by structural innovation, the novel biodegradable zinc alloy stent is promised to be an alternative choice in intervention surgeries.
基于降解模型的新型可生物降解锌合金支架力学分析
生物可降解支架由于可以避免动脉与永久性支架之间的不相容而引起的风险,引起了人们的广泛关注。然而,由于生物可降解材料的杨氏模量较差,降解过程中结构变弱,导致支架性能不足,因此生物可降解支架尚未广泛应用于临床治疗。在本研究中,基于均匀腐蚀和应力腐蚀的腐蚀模型,模拟专利支架和普通支架在40%狭窄血管中的降解。在降解过程中,分析了两种支架的支架性能及其对病变血管的重塑功能。结果表明,普通支架的径向反冲比和质量损失率分别为22.6%和14.1%。相比之下,普通支架的径向反冲比和质量损失率明显低于普通支架,分别为7.19%和3.1%。结果表明,与普通支架相比,该专利支架仍具有更强的支架性能。此外,由于专利支架对狭窄血管的积极影响,在专利支架部署的斑块中观察到更大更平坦的管腔。这意味着生物可降解支架的机械性能及其功能高度依赖于它们的几何形状。新型的生物可降解锌合金支架由于其结构的创新而提高了机械性能,有望成为介入手术的另一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics
Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics CELL BIOLOGYENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL&-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The field of biomechanics concerns with motion, deformation, and forces in biological systems. With the explosive progress in molecular biology, genomic engineering, bioimaging, and nanotechnology, there will be an ever-increasing generation of knowledge and information concerning the mechanobiology of genes, proteins, cells, tissues, and organs. Such information will bring new diagnostic tools, new therapeutic approaches, and new knowledge on ourselves and our interactions with our environment. It becomes apparent that biomechanics focusing on molecules, cells as well as tissues and organs is an important aspect of modern biomedical sciences. The aims of this journal are to facilitate the studies of the mechanics of biomolecules (including proteins, genes, cytoskeletons, etc.), cells (and their interactions with extracellular matrix), tissues and organs, the development of relevant advanced mathematical methods, and the discovery of biological secrets. As science concerns only with relative truth, we seek ideas that are state-of-the-art, which may be controversial, but stimulate and promote new ideas, new techniques, and new applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信