{"title":"Influence of Restoration Thickness and Auxillary Retentive Means on Fracture Resistance of Occlusal Ceramic Veneers","authors":"M. Aly, Cherief Mohsen","doi":"10.21608/jmr.2021.62981.1059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives:To evaluate the influence of restoration thickness and auxillary retentive means on fracture resistance of occlusal ceramic veneers. Materials and Methods: Forty sound molars were chosen which are free from caries, The teeth were divided into two classes and restored with CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic occlusal veneers. Group (1) has no finish line, while Group (2) has a finish line. Each category consisted of 10 molars with buccal groove extension and 10 molars without it, with two thicknesses of 1 and 1.5 mm.Usage of a universal testing machine to measuring the fracture strength of lithium di silicate material after loading till fracture. Results: Only specimens in the group with the thickest thickness of (1.5 mm ) survived cyclic loading without any damage. Survival rates in the remaining sub-groups ranged from 50 to 100% for surviving with some damage and from 12.5 to 75% for surviving without any damage. Medians of final fracture resistance ranged from 772 to 902 N. In groups with larger ceramic thickness (1.5 mm) provided statistically significant (p ≤0.05) higher fracture resistance than smaller one. Significance: Usage of 1.5mm thickness buccally retentive lithium disilicate ceramic occlusal veneers can restore successfully severely abraded teeth. Article information Received: 13 February 2021 Revised: 21 April 2021 Accepted: 20 April 2021","PeriodicalId":33372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jmr.2021.62981.1059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objectives:To evaluate the influence of restoration thickness and auxillary retentive means on fracture resistance of occlusal ceramic veneers. Materials and Methods: Forty sound molars were chosen which are free from caries, The teeth were divided into two classes and restored with CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic occlusal veneers. Group (1) has no finish line, while Group (2) has a finish line. Each category consisted of 10 molars with buccal groove extension and 10 molars without it, with two thicknesses of 1 and 1.5 mm.Usage of a universal testing machine to measuring the fracture strength of lithium di silicate material after loading till fracture. Results: Only specimens in the group with the thickest thickness of (1.5 mm ) survived cyclic loading without any damage. Survival rates in the remaining sub-groups ranged from 50 to 100% for surviving with some damage and from 12.5 to 75% for surviving without any damage. Medians of final fracture resistance ranged from 772 to 902 N. In groups with larger ceramic thickness (1.5 mm) provided statistically significant (p ≤0.05) higher fracture resistance than smaller one. Significance: Usage of 1.5mm thickness buccally retentive lithium disilicate ceramic occlusal veneers can restore successfully severely abraded teeth. Article information Received: 13 February 2021 Revised: 21 April 2021 Accepted: 20 April 2021