Economics and Morality Conflicts in the Public Goods Using

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS
V. Kyrylenko, Mykola Halaburda, T. Fedorenko, Ivan Lisniak
{"title":"Economics and Morality Conflicts in the Public Goods Using","authors":"V. Kyrylenko, Mykola Halaburda, T. Fedorenko, Ivan Lisniak","doi":"10.31520/2616-7107/2023.7.1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The country’s economic prosperity depends on economic, political, and social factors. A crucial component of a successful country’s development is its culture, which accumulates moral and value guidelines for the individual’s behaviour. Strict observance of moral rules is considerable for public trust formation, which is the foundation for social development. The relevance of the study is caused by the contradictions between individual and collective interests in using public goods. Individual interest gravitates toward cost reduction and avoiding payment for public goods. Instead, the collective interest consists in the moral obligation of the individual to pay for public goods for the general and individual well-being. \nAim and tasks. The purpose of the article is to interpret the phenomena of the economic, social, and cultural factors of the free-riding problem of public goods. \nResults. An attribute of public goods is their nonrivalrous nature (the use of the good does not reduce the amount of the good available to others) and non-excludable (non-payers can use the good on an equal basis with those who honestly paid). The free-ride problem of public goods cannot be reduced to market regulation, whereas all communities benefit from the resources, regardless of whether they have paid for them (taxes, transport fees) or not. Regression analysis shows no relationship between economic and moral factors, in particular, the ability to pay for a good (using public transport) does not reduce the number of people who want to get it free of charge (free ride). The cost of the service (the ticket price) also does not affect the willingness to pay or not to pay for public goods usage. Thus, it can be recognized that the economic factor is not critical in using public goods. \nConclusions. Simultaneously, the social factor of compliance with rules and trust is principal. The awareness that other participants also pay for public goods gives moral satisfaction to the individual and positively reinforces his conscience. Individuals’ consciousness and self-limitation form a cohesive community capable of development. Consequently, the social factor influences the individual's motivation and attitude toward the community's interests. Therefore, it can be assumed that the country’s economic growth depends on cultural and social norms regarding compliance with rules and trust, in addition to other factors.","PeriodicalId":29705,"journal":{"name":"Economics Ecology Socium","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Ecology Socium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2023.7.1-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The country’s economic prosperity depends on economic, political, and social factors. A crucial component of a successful country’s development is its culture, which accumulates moral and value guidelines for the individual’s behaviour. Strict observance of moral rules is considerable for public trust formation, which is the foundation for social development. The relevance of the study is caused by the contradictions between individual and collective interests in using public goods. Individual interest gravitates toward cost reduction and avoiding payment for public goods. Instead, the collective interest consists in the moral obligation of the individual to pay for public goods for the general and individual well-being. Aim and tasks. The purpose of the article is to interpret the phenomena of the economic, social, and cultural factors of the free-riding problem of public goods. Results. An attribute of public goods is their nonrivalrous nature (the use of the good does not reduce the amount of the good available to others) and non-excludable (non-payers can use the good on an equal basis with those who honestly paid). The free-ride problem of public goods cannot be reduced to market regulation, whereas all communities benefit from the resources, regardless of whether they have paid for them (taxes, transport fees) or not. Regression analysis shows no relationship between economic and moral factors, in particular, the ability to pay for a good (using public transport) does not reduce the number of people who want to get it free of charge (free ride). The cost of the service (the ticket price) also does not affect the willingness to pay or not to pay for public goods usage. Thus, it can be recognized that the economic factor is not critical in using public goods. Conclusions. Simultaneously, the social factor of compliance with rules and trust is principal. The awareness that other participants also pay for public goods gives moral satisfaction to the individual and positively reinforces his conscience. Individuals’ consciousness and self-limitation form a cohesive community capable of development. Consequently, the social factor influences the individual's motivation and attitude toward the community's interests. Therefore, it can be assumed that the country’s economic growth depends on cultural and social norms regarding compliance with rules and trust, in addition to other factors.
公共物品使用中的经济与道德冲突
介绍。这个国家的经济繁荣取决于经济、政治和社会因素。一个成功国家的发展的一个关键组成部分是它的文化,它为个人行为积累了道德和价值准则。社会信任是社会发展的基础,严格遵守道德规范对社会信任的形成至关重要。研究的相关性是由个人利益与集体利益在公共物品使用中的矛盾造成的。个人利益倾向于降低成本和避免为公共产品付费。相反,集体利益在于个人的道德义务,即为公众和个人福利支付公共产品。目标和任务。本文的目的是解释公共产品搭便车问题的经济、社会和文化因素现象。结果。公共物品的一个属性是它们的非竞争性(物品的使用不会减少其他人可以获得的物品的数量)和非排他性(非付款人可以与诚实付款的人平等使用物品)。公共产品的搭便车问题不能归结为市场监管,而所有社区都从这些资源中受益,无论他们是否为这些资源(税收、交通费)付费。回归分析显示经济和道德因素之间没有关系,特别是,支付能力(使用公共交通工具)并没有减少想要免费获得它(免费乘坐)的人数。服务的成本(票价)也不影响为公共物品的使用付费或不付费的意愿。因此,可以认识到,经济因素在公共产品的使用中并不重要。结论。同时,遵守规则和信任的社会因素是主要的。意识到其他参与者也在为公共物品买单,会给个人带来道德上的满足,并积极地增强他的良知。个体的自觉和自我限制形成了一个有凝聚力的发展共同体。因此,社会因素影响着个人对社会利益的动机和态度。因此,可以假设,除了其他因素外,该国的经济增长还取决于遵守规则和信任方面的文化和社会规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信