Comparison of Hand Grip Strength in patients with Distal Radius Fracture that are treated by Closed Reduction with Cast versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Haji Adam Malik Hospital Medan

Adri Yandra Hidayat, Nino Nasution, I. D. Winanto
{"title":"Comparison of Hand Grip Strength in patients with Distal\nRadius Fracture that are treated by Closed Reduction with\nCast versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Haji\nAdam Malik Hospital Medan","authors":"Adri Yandra Hidayat, Nino Nasution, I. D. Winanto","doi":"10.20902/ijctr.2019.130110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundDistal radius fracture is quite often found in emergency settings. There are many options to assess the outcome of treatment in distal radius fracture cases. One option that can be done is to measure the strength of the injured handgrip. Patient often complained about the decrease in ability to grasp and rotate and bear the burden after distal radius fracture. Objective-To find out the comparison of the hand grip strength in patients with distal radius fractures that are treated by closed reduction and casting to open reduction and internal fixation. Material and Methods-The study was conducted in a retrospective, observational analytic study with a cross sectional approach, which aimed to analyze the comparison of hand grip strength in patients with distal radius fractures that are treated by closed reduction and casting to open reduction and internal fixation12 months after treatment. Target population was all patients with distal radius fracture who underwent closed reduction and casting and open reduction and internal fixation in all inpatient at Adam Malik Hospital, Medan. ResultsIn this study the distribution of the number of samples was as many as 57 subjects with 17 are women (29.8%) and 40 are men (70.2%). 18 years old is the youngest age of the samples and the oldest is 76 years old with a mean of 32.77 ± 14.03 years. Based on the mechanism of injury : motor vehicle accidents is the most common mechanism of injury, it accounts 45 people (78.9%). According to time arrivals mostly patient came <24 hours. There are 11 extraarticular fractures ( 19.3%) and 46 intraarticular fractures (80.7%), there were 24 people (42.1%) fracture in the right hand and 33 people (57.9%) in the left hand. Statistical analysis shows that there is no difference in the ratio of hand grip strength with significance value of (p value) 0.881 (> 0.05). ConclusionThere were no significant differences in the clinical outcome of the patient's hand grip strength in patients that are treated with closed reduction and casting to open reduction intenal fixation after 12 months post theraphy.","PeriodicalId":13853,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of ChemTech Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"84-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of ChemTech Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20902/ijctr.2019.130110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDistal radius fracture is quite often found in emergency settings. There are many options to assess the outcome of treatment in distal radius fracture cases. One option that can be done is to measure the strength of the injured handgrip. Patient often complained about the decrease in ability to grasp and rotate and bear the burden after distal radius fracture. Objective-To find out the comparison of the hand grip strength in patients with distal radius fractures that are treated by closed reduction and casting to open reduction and internal fixation. Material and Methods-The study was conducted in a retrospective, observational analytic study with a cross sectional approach, which aimed to analyze the comparison of hand grip strength in patients with distal radius fractures that are treated by closed reduction and casting to open reduction and internal fixation12 months after treatment. Target population was all patients with distal radius fracture who underwent closed reduction and casting and open reduction and internal fixation in all inpatient at Adam Malik Hospital, Medan. ResultsIn this study the distribution of the number of samples was as many as 57 subjects with 17 are women (29.8%) and 40 are men (70.2%). 18 years old is the youngest age of the samples and the oldest is 76 years old with a mean of 32.77 ± 14.03 years. Based on the mechanism of injury : motor vehicle accidents is the most common mechanism of injury, it accounts 45 people (78.9%). According to time arrivals mostly patient came <24 hours. There are 11 extraarticular fractures ( 19.3%) and 46 intraarticular fractures (80.7%), there were 24 people (42.1%) fracture in the right hand and 33 people (57.9%) in the left hand. Statistical analysis shows that there is no difference in the ratio of hand grip strength with significance value of (p value) 0.881 (> 0.05). ConclusionThere were no significant differences in the clinical outcome of the patient's hand grip strength in patients that are treated with closed reduction and casting to open reduction intenal fixation after 12 months post theraphy.
棉兰hajiadammalik医院桡骨远端骨折闭合复位铸造与开放复位内固定的手部握力比较
背景:桡骨远端骨折常见于急诊。评估桡骨远端骨折治疗效果的方法有很多。一个可以做的选择是测量受伤手的握力。患者常主诉桡骨远端骨折后抓握、旋转和负重能力下降。目的:探讨桡骨远端骨折闭合复位与铸造与切开复位内固定的手部握力对比。材料和方法:本研究采用回顾性、观察性分析研究,采用横断面方法,旨在分析桡骨远端骨折患者在治疗12个月后,采用闭合复位和铸造与开放复位内固定治疗的手部握力的比较。目标人群为棉兰Adam Malik医院所有接受闭合复位铸造和开放复位内固定的桡骨远端骨折患者。结果本研究样本数分布为57人,其中女性17人(29.8%),男性40人(70.2%)。年龄最小为18岁,最大为76岁,平均32.77±14.03岁。基于伤害机制:机动车事故是最常见的伤害机制,占45人(78.9%)。根据到达时间,大多数患者到达0.05)。结论闭合复位+铸造-开放复位内固定治疗12个月后患者的手部握力的临床结果无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信