The Comparative Study of Key Performance Ratios of Selected Indian Private Banks

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Sanjana Joshi
{"title":"The Comparative Study of Key Performance Ratios of Selected Indian Private Banks","authors":"Sanjana Joshi","doi":"10.56209/jommerce.v3i1.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is mainly based on the comparative study of India's private banks during the study period of 2017-18 to 2021-22. For the  perspective of comparative study Key performing ratios are selected and hypothesis testing is done by one way ANOVA test. The testing hypothesis is Ho hypothesis is rejected in NPM , OPM, ROCE ratio that means there is no significant difference between selected sample units, while Ho is accepted only in CASA ratio that means there is significant difference between selected sample units. And the findings of study  are HDFC Bank and KMB generate a more profit from their services  with low operating cost. It shows good operating efficiency. The performance of ICICI Bank is average during the study period, but Axis Bank's performance is not good compared with other banks.","PeriodicalId":37316,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56209/jommerce.v3i1.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is mainly based on the comparative study of India's private banks during the study period of 2017-18 to 2021-22. For the  perspective of comparative study Key performing ratios are selected and hypothesis testing is done by one way ANOVA test. The testing hypothesis is Ho hypothesis is rejected in NPM , OPM, ROCE ratio that means there is no significant difference between selected sample units, while Ho is accepted only in CASA ratio that means there is significant difference between selected sample units. And the findings of study  are HDFC Bank and KMB generate a more profit from their services  with low operating cost. It shows good operating efficiency. The performance of ICICI Bank is average during the study period, but Axis Bank's performance is not good compared with other banks.
印度部分私人银行关键绩效比率的比较研究
本文主要基于2017-18至2021-22研究期间印度私人银行的比较研究。从比较研究的角度选择关键绩效比率,采用单因素方差分析进行假设检验。检验假设是Ho假设在NPM, OPM, ROCE比率中被拒绝,即所选样本单位之间不存在显著差异,而Ho假设仅在CASA比率中被接受,即所选样本单位之间存在显著差异。研究结果显示,建商银行和九巴的营运成本较低,服务利润较高。运行效率高。在研究期间,ICICI银行的表现一般,但Axis银行的表现与其他银行相比并不好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science
Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信