Seidyak and Uraz-Muhammad in siberian history

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
Elena A. Ryabinina, D. Maslyuzhenko
{"title":"Seidyak and Uraz-Muhammad in siberian history","authors":"Elena A. Ryabinina, D. Maslyuzhenko","doi":"10.22378/2313-6197.2023-11-2.380-396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research objectives: To identify the features of the appearance and activity in the Siberian Khanate of the last Taibugid Prince Seidyak and the Kazakh tsarevich, Uraz-Muhammad. Research materials: This work was carried out on the basis of the analysis of published chronicles of various origins, the collection of chronicles of Utemish Hadji, dastans of Kadyr Ali-bek, and unpublished documents from the fund 127 (relations with Nogai Tatars) of the RGADA, the Siberian chronicle of Ivan Chereapanov, etc. Results and scientific novelty: In historical research, under the influence of various editions of the so-called “Siberian chronicles”, there has emerged a traditional concept of Prince Seidyak’s activity as that of one of the main opponents of the Siberian Khan Kuchum. However, the late nature and inconsistency of these chronicles in relation to each other and some documents that are contemporary to the events make it possible to construct a different concept of the events of 1585–1588 in Siberia. Brought up at the court of the sayyid most likely associated with the tariqa Naqshbanidiya, the descendant of the Siberian princes appeared in Siberia no earlier than the middle of 1585. It is doubtful that the Bukhara Sayyids and merchants who were associated with them, being interested in local furs and havkng invested a lot of effort in the Islamization of the khanate, could send a legitimate khan to the north. The theory about the need to expand support for Kuchum by various groups, including those loyal to the princely dynasty, looks more realistic. This explains the participation of Saydiak in the division of Ermak’s property, and the absence of direct conflicts with the khan, with the exception of taking Isker from his son, Ali, who had a rather strained relationship with his father and brother. At the same time, the Bukhara leaders could remind Kuchum that they had the option of a political alternative. Almost at the same time, the grandson of the Kazakh khan, Shigai Uraz-Muhammad, whose father Ondan died during another Kazakh-Kalmyk clash, could appear in Siberia. Ondan had supported his father and brother Tavvakul, including in the conclusion of a Kazakh-Bukhara union. Judging by indirect references, the ruling family was also associated with one of the Bukhara tariqas. The reasons for sending Uraz-Muhammad and his family to Siberia are presented inconsistently in the literature due to the lack of sources on this issue. They also ended up initially at the court of Khan Kuchum where part of Ondan’s family had settled. After the capture of Isker, the tsarevich, along with the Siberian carp who joined him, found themselves in Isker, where they strengthened the Seidyak. The attempt to build the concept of a real “triumvirate” made up of Prince Seidyak, Tsarevich Uraz-Muhammad, and Siberia’s Karachi as an alternative political center to Khan Kuchum and his sons at the moment looks groundless due to the lack of information about their activities between the capture of Isker and the Russian captivity in 1588. Even if they had some political ambitions, they did not demonstrate them in any way.","PeriodicalId":41481,"journal":{"name":"Zolotoordynskoe Obozrenie-Golden Horde Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zolotoordynskoe Obozrenie-Golden Horde Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2023-11-2.380-396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research objectives: To identify the features of the appearance and activity in the Siberian Khanate of the last Taibugid Prince Seidyak and the Kazakh tsarevich, Uraz-Muhammad. Research materials: This work was carried out on the basis of the analysis of published chronicles of various origins, the collection of chronicles of Utemish Hadji, dastans of Kadyr Ali-bek, and unpublished documents from the fund 127 (relations with Nogai Tatars) of the RGADA, the Siberian chronicle of Ivan Chereapanov, etc. Results and scientific novelty: In historical research, under the influence of various editions of the so-called “Siberian chronicles”, there has emerged a traditional concept of Prince Seidyak’s activity as that of one of the main opponents of the Siberian Khan Kuchum. However, the late nature and inconsistency of these chronicles in relation to each other and some documents that are contemporary to the events make it possible to construct a different concept of the events of 1585–1588 in Siberia. Brought up at the court of the sayyid most likely associated with the tariqa Naqshbanidiya, the descendant of the Siberian princes appeared in Siberia no earlier than the middle of 1585. It is doubtful that the Bukhara Sayyids and merchants who were associated with them, being interested in local furs and havkng invested a lot of effort in the Islamization of the khanate, could send a legitimate khan to the north. The theory about the need to expand support for Kuchum by various groups, including those loyal to the princely dynasty, looks more realistic. This explains the participation of Saydiak in the division of Ermak’s property, and the absence of direct conflicts with the khan, with the exception of taking Isker from his son, Ali, who had a rather strained relationship with his father and brother. At the same time, the Bukhara leaders could remind Kuchum that they had the option of a political alternative. Almost at the same time, the grandson of the Kazakh khan, Shigai Uraz-Muhammad, whose father Ondan died during another Kazakh-Kalmyk clash, could appear in Siberia. Ondan had supported his father and brother Tavvakul, including in the conclusion of a Kazakh-Bukhara union. Judging by indirect references, the ruling family was also associated with one of the Bukhara tariqas. The reasons for sending Uraz-Muhammad and his family to Siberia are presented inconsistently in the literature due to the lack of sources on this issue. They also ended up initially at the court of Khan Kuchum where part of Ondan’s family had settled. After the capture of Isker, the tsarevich, along with the Siberian carp who joined him, found themselves in Isker, where they strengthened the Seidyak. The attempt to build the concept of a real “triumvirate” made up of Prince Seidyak, Tsarevich Uraz-Muhammad, and Siberia’s Karachi as an alternative political center to Khan Kuchum and his sons at the moment looks groundless due to the lack of information about their activities between the capture of Isker and the Russian captivity in 1588. Even if they had some political ambitions, they did not demonstrate them in any way.
西伯利亚历史上的赛迪亚克和乌拉兹-穆罕默德
研究目的:确定末代太卜吉德王子赛季亚克和哈萨克沙皇乌拉兹-穆罕默德在西伯利亚汗国的外貌和活动特征。研究资料:本工作是在分析各种来源的已出版编年史、Utemish Hadji编年史合集、Kadyr Ali-bek的纪事、RGADA基金127(与诺盖鞑靼人的关系)未出版的文件、Ivan Chereapanov的西伯利亚编年史等基础上进行的。结果与科学的新颖性:在历史研究中,在各种版本的所谓“西伯利亚编年史”的影响下,出现了一种传统的观念,即塞季亚克王子的活动是西伯利亚汗库彻姆的主要反对者之一。然而,这些编年史的后期性质和彼此之间的不一致性,以及与这些事件同时代的一些文件,使得人们有可能对1585-1588年的西伯利亚事件构建不同的概念。在最有可能与tariqa Naqshbanidiya有关的sayyid的宫廷中长大,西伯利亚王子的后裔出现在西伯利亚不早于1585年中期。布哈拉赛义德人和与他们有联系的商人对当地的皮草感兴趣,并在汗国的伊斯兰化方面投入了大量精力,他们是否能把一个合法的汗派往北方,这是值得怀疑的。关于需要扩大各种团体(包括那些忠于王侯王朝的人)对库库姆的支持的理论,看起来更现实。这就解释了为什么Saydiak参与了拆分Ermak的财产,并且没有与可汗发生直接冲突,除了从他的儿子Ali手中夺走Isker,后者与父亲和兄弟的关系相当紧张。与此同时,布哈拉领导人可以提醒库彻姆,他们有另一种政治选择。几乎与此同时,哈萨克可汗的孙子,其父亲Ondan死于另一场哈萨克-卡尔梅克冲突的Shigai Uraz-Muhammad,可能出现在西伯利亚。奥丹一直支持他的父亲和兄弟塔夫瓦库尔,包括哈萨克和布哈拉的联合。根据间接参考资料判断,统治家族也与一个布哈拉tariqas有联系。由于缺乏有关这一问题的资料来源,将乌拉兹-穆罕默德及其家人送到西伯利亚的原因在文献中呈现不一致。他们最初也来到了汗库彻姆(Khan Kuchum)的朝廷,奥丹的部分家族在那里定居。在伊斯克被捕后,沙皇和加入他的西伯利亚鲤鱼发现自己在伊斯克,在那里他们加强了塞迪亚克。试图建立一个真正的“三驾马车”的概念,即由塞迪亚克王子、乌拉兹-穆罕默德和西伯利亚的卡拉奇组成的政治中心,以取代可汗·库钦和他的儿子们,目前看来是毫无根据的,因为缺乏关于他们在捕获伊斯克尔和1588年被俄国俘虏之间的活动的信息。即使他们有一些政治野心,他们也没有以任何方式表现出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信